Cost-benefit analysis of rotavirus vaccine included in the national immunization program in China

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Shuning [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Shenghui [1 ,3 ]
Li, Jingxin [1 ]
Li, Jingsong [1 ]
Duan, Zhao-jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Inst Viral Dis Control & Prevent, NHC Key Lab Med Virol & Viral Dis, Beijing 100052, Peoples R China
[2] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Gansu Univ, Tradit Chinese Med Sch Publ Hlth, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
关键词
Rotavirus vaccine; Cost -benefit national immunization; program China; CHILDREN LESS-THAN-5; DOUBLE-BLIND; EFFICACY; DIARRHEA; INFANTS; SAFETY; BURDEN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.074
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Globally, rotavirus is a leading cause of severe acute gastroenteritis among children aged under 5 years and has a significant economic cost. Currently, rotavirus vaccines are only included in the private market in China. This study aimed to assess the cost-benefit of including a three-dose rota -virus vaccine in China's National Immunization Program (NIP).Methods: A decision tree Markov model was constructed to evaluate the cost-benefit of universal immu-nization with three doses of rotavirus vaccine for a 2019 birth cohort of Chinese children. Costs of the universal vaccination program included vaccine price, vaccine wastage, vaccine administration, and indi-rect costs. All costs were discounted at 3 % per year and converted from 2019 Chinese Yuan to 2019 USD using the 2019 exchange rate.Results: For the 2019 birth cohort of Chinese infants, inclusion of RotaTeq in NIP was estimated to pre-vent 5,677,911 cases of rotavirus infection, with net savings of $1.1 billion in total societal costs. A cost of $17.55 per vaccine dose was the threshold at which inclusion of rotavirus vaccine in NIP would be cost -saving.Conclusions: Introducing rotavirus vaccine into the China NIP would have significant costs from a societal perspective at the current private market price.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 554
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Rotavirus Vaccine Impact since Its Introduction in the National Immunization Program of Argentina
    Sebastian Garcia Marti
    Luz Gibbons
    Sara Reidel
    Juan Stupka
    Juan Degiuseppe
    Fernando Argento
    Jorge A. Gómez
    Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 2023, 12 : 513 - 526
  • [22] A cost-benefit analysis of Tulsa's IDA program
    Greenberg, David H.
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2013, 4 (03) : 263 - 300
  • [23] Cost-benefit Analysis of the Coping and Promoting Strength Program
    Slade, Eric P.
    Ginsburg, Golda S.
    Riddle, Mark A.
    PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2021, 22 (08) : 1096 - 1107
  • [24] Cost-benefit Analysis of the Coping and Promoting Strength Program
    Eric P. Slade
    Golda S. Ginsburg
    Mark A. Riddle
    Prevention Science, 2021, 22 : 1096 - 1107
  • [25] A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Privatization of Canadian National Railway
    Boardman, Anthony E.
    Laurin, Claude
    Moore, Mark A.
    Vining, Aidan R.
    CANADIAN PUBLIC POLICY-ANALYSE DE POLITIQUES, 2009, 35 (01): : 59 - 83
  • [26] Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Support Program for Nursing Staff
    Moran, Dane
    Wu, Albert W.
    Connors, Cheryl
    Chappidi, Meera R.
    Sreedhara, Sushama K.
    Selter, Jessica H.
    Padula, William V.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2020, 16 (04) : E250 - E254
  • [27] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND SOCIAL WELFARE PROGRAM EVALUATION
    LEVINE, AS
    SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 1968, 42 (02) : 173 - 183
  • [28] A cost-benefit analysis of Colorado's oxyfuels program
    Duggan, TE
    EXPERIMENTING WITH FREER MARKETS: LESSONS FROM THE LAST 20 YEARS AND PROSPECTS FOR THE FUTURE - VOL 2, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 501 - 510
  • [29] Why environmental and social benefits should be included in cost-benefit analysis of infrastructure?
    Ryu, Jaena
    Kim, Kyungah
    Oh, Myoungjin
    Shin, Jungwoo
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (21) : 21693 - 21703
  • [30] Why environmental and social benefits should be included in cost-benefit analysis of infrastructure?
    Jaena Ryu
    Kyungah Kim
    Myoungjin Oh
    Jungwoo Shin
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 : 21693 - 21703