共 50 条
A review of machine learning applications in life cycle assessment studies
被引:16
|作者:
Romeiko, Xiaobo Xue
[1
]
Zhang, Xuesong
[2
]
Pang, Yulei
[3
]
Gao, Feng
[2
]
Xu, Ming
[4
]
Lin, Shao
[1
]
Babbitt, Callie
[5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Albany, State Univ New York, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[2] United States Dept Agr, Hydrol & Remote Sensing Lab, Washington, DC 20250 USA
[3] Southern Connecticut State Univ, Dept Math, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Dvis Environm Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Rochester Inst Technol, Golisano Inst Sustainabil, Dept Sustainabil, Rochester, NY USA
关键词:
Life cycle assessment;
Machine learning;
Sustainability;
Prediction;
Model selection;
ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK;
BIG DATA;
CROSS-VALIDATION;
CARBON FOOTPRINT;
EMISSIONS;
MODEL;
INVENTORY;
IMPACTS;
DESIGN;
D O I:
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168969
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a foundational method for quantitative assessment of sustainability. Increasing data availability and rapid development of machine learning (ML) approaches offer new opportunities to advance LCA. Here, we review current progress and knowledge gaps in applying ML techniques to support LCA, and identify future research directions for LCAs to better harness the power of ML. This review analyzes forty studies reporting quantitative assessment with a combination of LCA and ML methods. We found that ML approaches have been used for generating life cycle inventories, computing characterization factors, estimating life cycle impacts, and supporting life cycle interpretation. Most of the reviewed studies employed a single ML method, with artificial neural networks (ANNs) as the most frequently applied approach. Both supervised and unsupervised ML techniques were used in LCA studies. For studies using supervised ML, training datasets were derived from diverse sources, such as literature, lab experiments, existing databases, and model simulations. Over 70 % of these reviewed studies trained ML models with less than 1500 sample datasets. Although these reviewed studies showed that ML approaches help improve prediction accuracy, pattern discovery and computational efficiency, multiple areas deserve further research. First, continuous data collection and compilation is needed to support more reliable ML and LCA modeling. Second, future studies should report sufficient details regarding the selection criteria for ML models and present model uncertainty analysis. Third, incorporating deep learning models into LCA holds promise to further improve life cycle inventory and impact assessment. Finally, the complexity of current environmental challenges calls for interdisciplinary collaborative research to achieve deep integration of ML into LCA to support sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文