Femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional and radiologic outcomes

被引:2
|
作者
Castricini, Roberto [1 ]
Mercurio, Michele [2 ]
Galasso, Olimpio [2 ]
Sanzo, Valentina [2 ]
De Gori, Marco [3 ]
De Benedetto, Massimo [1 ]
Orlando, Nicola [1 ]
Gasparini, Giorgio [2 ]
机构
[1] Villa Verde, Div Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Fermo, Italy
[2] Magna Graecia Univ Catanzaro, Mater Domini Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Catanzaro, Italy
[3] Basso Ionio Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Soverato, Italy
关键词
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; glenoid bone loss; femoral head allograft; 3-dimensional (3D) model; patient-specific instru- mentation; bone graft; baseplate failure; GLENOHUMERAL OSTEOARTHRITIS; DEFECTS; MANAGEMENT; CUFF; B3; B2;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2023.06.027
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Several techniques have been adopted during primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to manage glenoid bone defect. Among bone grafts, humeral head autograft is currently the mainstream option. However, autologous humeral heads may be unavailable or inadequate, and allografts may be a viable alternative. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the functional and radiologic outcomes of femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects in primary RSA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study with prospective data collection enrolling 20 consecutive patients who underwent RSA with femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects. Indications for surgery were eccentric cuff tear arthropathy in 10 cases (50%), concentric osteoarthritis in 9 cases (45%), and fracture sequelae in 1 case (5%). Each patient was evaluated preoperatively and at follow-up by radiologic and computed tomography (CT) and by assessing the range of motion (ROM) and the Constant-Murley score (CMS). A CT-based software, a patient-specific 3D model of the scapula, and patient-specific instrumentation were used to shape the graft and to assess the position of K-wire for the central peg. Postoperatively, CT scans were used to identify graft incorporation and resorption. Results: After a median follow-up of 26.5 months ( 24-38), ROM and CMS showed a statistically significant improvement (all P = .001). The median measures of the graft were as follows: 28 mm (28-29) for diameter, 22 degrees (10 degrees-31 degrees) for angle, 4 mm (2-8 mm) for minimum thickness, and 15 mm (11-21 mm) for maximum thickness. Before the surgery, the median glenoid version was 21.8 degrees (16.5 degrees-33.5 degrees) for the retroverted glenoids and -13.5 degrees (-23 degrees to -12 degrees) for the anteverted glenoids. At the follow-up, the median postoperative baseplate retroversion was 5.7 degrees (2.2 degrees-1.5 degrees) (P = .001), and this value was close to the 4 degrees retroversion planned on the preoperative CT-based software. Postoperative major complications were noted in 4 patients: 2 dislocations, 1 baseplate failure following a high-energy trauma, and 1 septic baseplate failure. Partial graft resorption without glenoid component failure was observed in 3 cases that did not require revision surgery. Conclusion: The femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary RSA restores shoulder function, with CMS values comparable to those of sexand age -matched healthy individuals. A high rate of incorporation of the graft and satisfactory correction of the glenoid version can be expected after surgery. The management of glenoid bone defects remains a challenging procedure, and a 15% risk of major complication must be considered. Level of evidence: Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study (c) 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:e58 / e67
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of different peg length in glenoid bone loss: A biomechanical analysis regarding primary stability of the glenoid baseplate in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Koenigshausen, M.
    Jettkant, B.
    Sverdlova, N.
    Ehlert, C.
    Gessmann, J.
    Schildhauer, T. A.
    Seybold, D.
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2015, 23 (06) : 855 - 869
  • [22] Structural glenoid allograft reconstruction during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Tashjian, Robert Z.
    Broschinsky, Kortnie
    Stertz, Irene
    Chalmers, Peter N.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (03) : 534 - 540
  • [23] Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Small Glenoid Baseplate in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Multicenter Study
    Kim, Min-Su
    Rhee, Yong Girl
    Oh, Joo Han
    Yoo, Jae Chul
    Noh, Kyu-Cheol
    Shin, Sang-Jin
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (01) : 119 - 127
  • [24] Glenoid structural bone grafting in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiographic outcomes
    Sholtis, Connor
    Kha, Stephanie T.
    Ramakrishnan, Anna
    Abrams, Geoffrey D.
    Freehill, Michael T.
    V. Cheung, Emilie
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2025, 34 (02) : e103 - e111
  • [25] The Use of Glenoid Structural Allografts for Glenoid Bone Defects in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Ingoe, Helen
    Italia, Kristine
    Gilliland, Luke
    Kang, Hean Wu
    Karel, Mirek
    Maharaj, Jashint
    Cutbush, Kenneth
    Gupta, Ashish
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (07)
  • [26] Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Presence of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss
    Stephens, Scott P.
    Paisley, Kevin C.
    Jeng, Jeffrey
    Dutta, Anil K.
    Wirth, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (03): : 251 - 259
  • [27] Glenoid bone loss in shoulder arthroplasty: a narrative review
    Al-Omairi, Sultan
    Albadran, Adeeba
    Dagher, Danielle
    Leroux, Timothy
    Khan, Moin
    ANNALS OF JOINT, 2024, 9 : 1 - 11
  • [28] Early radiographic failure of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with structural bone graft for glenoid bone loss
    Ho, Jason C.
    Thakar, Ocean
    Chan, Wayne W.
    Nicholson, Thema
    Williams, Gerald R.
    Namdari, Surena
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (03) : 550 - 560
  • [29] Computed tomographic evaluation of glenoid joint line restoration with glenoid bone grafting and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with significant glenoid bone loss
    Italia, Kristine R.
    Green, Nicholas
    Maharaj, Jashint
    Launay, Marine
    Gupta, Ashish
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (03) : 599 - 608
  • [30] Management of Humeral and Glenoid Bone Defects in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Friedman, Lisa G. M.
    Garrigues, Grant E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2021, 29 (17) : E846 - E859