Femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional and radiologic outcomes

被引:2
|
作者
Castricini, Roberto [1 ]
Mercurio, Michele [2 ]
Galasso, Olimpio [2 ]
Sanzo, Valentina [2 ]
De Gori, Marco [3 ]
De Benedetto, Massimo [1 ]
Orlando, Nicola [1 ]
Gasparini, Giorgio [2 ]
机构
[1] Villa Verde, Div Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Fermo, Italy
[2] Magna Graecia Univ Catanzaro, Mater Domini Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Catanzaro, Italy
[3] Basso Ionio Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Soverato, Italy
关键词
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; glenoid bone loss; femoral head allograft; 3-dimensional (3D) model; patient-specific instru- mentation; bone graft; baseplate failure; GLENOHUMERAL OSTEOARTHRITIS; DEFECTS; MANAGEMENT; CUFF; B3; B2;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2023.06.027
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Several techniques have been adopted during primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to manage glenoid bone defect. Among bone grafts, humeral head autograft is currently the mainstream option. However, autologous humeral heads may be unavailable or inadequate, and allografts may be a viable alternative. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the functional and radiologic outcomes of femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects in primary RSA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study with prospective data collection enrolling 20 consecutive patients who underwent RSA with femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects. Indications for surgery were eccentric cuff tear arthropathy in 10 cases (50%), concentric osteoarthritis in 9 cases (45%), and fracture sequelae in 1 case (5%). Each patient was evaluated preoperatively and at follow-up by radiologic and computed tomography (CT) and by assessing the range of motion (ROM) and the Constant-Murley score (CMS). A CT-based software, a patient-specific 3D model of the scapula, and patient-specific instrumentation were used to shape the graft and to assess the position of K-wire for the central peg. Postoperatively, CT scans were used to identify graft incorporation and resorption. Results: After a median follow-up of 26.5 months ( 24-38), ROM and CMS showed a statistically significant improvement (all P = .001). The median measures of the graft were as follows: 28 mm (28-29) for diameter, 22 degrees (10 degrees-31 degrees) for angle, 4 mm (2-8 mm) for minimum thickness, and 15 mm (11-21 mm) for maximum thickness. Before the surgery, the median glenoid version was 21.8 degrees (16.5 degrees-33.5 degrees) for the retroverted glenoids and -13.5 degrees (-23 degrees to -12 degrees) for the anteverted glenoids. At the follow-up, the median postoperative baseplate retroversion was 5.7 degrees (2.2 degrees-1.5 degrees) (P = .001), and this value was close to the 4 degrees retroversion planned on the preoperative CT-based software. Postoperative major complications were noted in 4 patients: 2 dislocations, 1 baseplate failure following a high-energy trauma, and 1 septic baseplate failure. Partial graft resorption without glenoid component failure was observed in 3 cases that did not require revision surgery. Conclusion: The femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary RSA restores shoulder function, with CMS values comparable to those of sexand age -matched healthy individuals. A high rate of incorporation of the graft and satisfactory correction of the glenoid version can be expected after surgery. The management of glenoid bone defects remains a challenging procedure, and a 15% risk of major complication must be considered. Level of evidence: Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study (c) 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:e58 / e67
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of femoral head allograft for the management of glenoid bone defects in revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a case-controlled study
    Kusin, David J.
    Teytelbaum, David E.
    Teusink, Matthew J.
    Moen, Patrick
    Melbourne, Craig
    Simon, Peter
    Christmas, Kaitlyn N.
    Frankle, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (06) : S32 - S38
  • [2] Management of Glenoid Bone Loss in Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Mehta, Nabil
    Nicholson, Gregory P.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2023, 16 (08) : 358 - 370
  • [3] Management of Glenoid Bone Loss in Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Nabil Mehta
    Gregory P. Nicholson
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2023, 16 : 358 - 370
  • [4] Revision shoulder arthroplasty with a reverse shoulder prosthesis Use of structural allograft for glenoid bone loss
    Ozgur, S. E.
    Sadeghpour, R.
    Norris, T. R.
    ORTHOPADE, 2017, 46 (12): : 1055 - 1062
  • [5] Challenges in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Addressing Glenoid Bone Loss
    Seidl, Adam J.
    Williams, Gerald R.
    Boileau, Pascal
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 39 (01) : 14 - 23
  • [6] Glenoid bone grafting in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Ernstbrunner, Lukas
    Werthel, Jean-David
    Wagner, Eric
    Hatta, Taku
    Sperling, John W.
    Cofield, Robert H.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (08) : 1441 - 1447
  • [7] Outcomes following humeral head autograft glenoid reconstruction in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Guareschi, Alexander S.
    Gannon, Steven T.
    Welsh, Megan E.
    Reis, Robert J.
    Wright, Thomas W.
    King, Joseph J.
    Papandrea, Rick F.
    Simovitch, Ryan W.
    Friedman, Richard J.
    Eichinger, Josef K.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2025, 34 (04) : 1051 - 1060
  • [8] Managing Glenoid Bone Loss in Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Frank, Tym F.
    Pike, Jeffrey M.
    Carroll, Michael J.
    Goel, Danny P.
    TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 17 (01): : 11 - 18
  • [9] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a "L" shaped allograft for glenoid reconstruction in a patient with massive glenoid bone loss: case report
    De Biase, C. F.
    Ziveri, G.
    De Caro, F.
    Roberts, N.
    Delcogliano, M.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 18 : 44 - 49
  • [10] The effect of glenoid bone loss on reverse shoulder arthroplasty baseplate fixation
    Formaini, Nathan T.
    Everding, Nathan G.
    Levy, Jonathan C.
    Santoni, Brandon G.
    Nayak, Aniruddh N.
    Wilson, Cooper
    Cabezas, Andres F.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (11) : E312 - E319