Residential Segregation and County-Level COVID-19 Booster Coverage in the Deep South: Surveillance Report and Ecological Study

被引:2
|
作者
Zeng, Chengbo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jiajia [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Li, Zhenlong [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Sun, Xiaowen [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ning, Huan [3 ,5 ]
Yang, Xueying [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Weissman, Sharon [2 ,6 ]
Olatosi, Bankole [2 ,3 ,7 ]
Li, Xiaoming [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot Educ & Behav, 4th Floor,915 Greene St, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, South Carolina SmartState Ctr Healthcare Qual, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Univ South Carolina, Big Data Hlth Sci Ctr, Columbia, SC USA
[4] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Columbia, SC USA
[5] Univ South Carolina, Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Geog, Geoinformat & Big Data Res Lab, Columbia, SC USA
[6] Univ South Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Columbia, SC USA
[7] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv Policy & Management, Columbia, SC USA
来源
关键词
Deep South; COVID-19; vaccine; booster; residential segregation; UNITED-STATES; DISPARITIES;
D O I
10.2196/44257
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: COVID-19 had a greater impact in the Deep South compared with other regions in the United States. While vaccination remains a top priority for all eligible individuals, data regarding the progress of booster coverage in the Deep South and how the coverage varies by county and age are sparse. Despite existing evidence of racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 vaccinations at the individual level, there is an urgent need for evidence at the population level. Such information could highlight vulnerable communities and guide future health care policy-making and resource allocation. Objective: We aimed to evaluate county-level COVID-19 booster coverage by age group in the Deep South and explore its association with residential segregation. Methods: An ecological study was conducted at the population level by integrating COVID-19 vaccine surveillance data, residential segregation index, and county-level factors across the 418 counties of 5 Deep South states from December 15, 2021, to October 19, 2022. We analyzed the cumulative percentages of county-level COVID-19 booster uptake by age group (eg, 12 to 17 years, 18 to 64 years, and at least 65 years) by the end of the study period. The longitudinal relationships were examined between residential segregation, the interaction of time and residential segregation, and COVID-19 booster coverage using the Poisson model. Results: As of October 19, 2022, among the 418 counties, the median of booster uptake was 40% (IQR 37.8%-43%). Compared with older adults (ie, at least 65 years; median 63.1%, IQR 59.5%-66.5%), youth (ie, 12 to 17 years; median 14.1%, IQR 11.3%-17.4%) and adults (ie, 18 to 64 years; median 33.4%, IQR 30.5%-36.5%) had lower percentages of booster uptake. There was geospatial heterogeneity in the county-level COVID-19 booster coverage. We found that higher segregated counties had lower percentages of booster coverage. Such relationships attenuated as time increased. The findings were consistent across the age groups.Conclusions: The progress of county-level COVID-19 booster coverage in the Deep South was slow and varied by age group. Residential segregation precluded the county-level COVID-19 booster coverage across age groups. Future efforts regarding vaccination strategies should focus on youth and adults. Health care facilities and resources are needed in racial and ethnic minority communities.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COVID-19 vaccination rates vary by community vulnerability: A county-level analysis
    Brown, Clare C.
    Young, Sean G.
    Pro, George C.
    VACCINE, 2021, 39 (31) : 4245 - 4249
  • [42] Association between county-level risk groups and COVID-19 outcomes in the United States: a socioecological study
    Sadiya S. Khan
    Amy E. Krefman
    Megan E. McCabe
    Lucia C. Petito
    Xiaoyun Yang
    Kiarri N. Kershaw
    Lindsay R. Pool
    Norrina B. Allen
    BMC Public Health, 22
  • [43] Political Economy of the COVID-19 Pandemic: How State Policies Shape County-Level Disparities in COVID-19 Deaths
    Sun, Yue
    Bisesti, Erin M.
    SOCIUS, 2023, 9
  • [44] Association between county-level risk groups and COVID-19 outcomes in the United States: a socioecological study
    Khan, Sadiya S.
    Krefman, Amy E.
    McCabe, Megan E.
    Petito, Lucia C.
    Yang, Xiaoyun
    Kershaw, Kiarri N.
    Pool, Lindsay R.
    Allen, Norrina B.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [45] Moral Values Predict County-Level COVID-19 Vaccination Rates in the United States
    Reimer, Nils Karl
    Atari, Mohammad
    Karimi-Malekabadi, Farzan
    Trager, Jackson
    Kennedy, Brendan
    Graham, Jesse
    Dehghani, Morteza
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2022, 77 (06) : 743 - 759
  • [46] County-Level Determinants of COVID-19 Testing and Cases: Are there Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Texas?
    Adepoju, Omolola E.
    Ojinnaka, Chinedum O.
    POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2021, 24 (05) : 589 - 594
  • [47] County-level prioritization for managing the Covid-19 pandemic: a systematic unsupervised learning approach
    Hettiarachchi C.S.
    Sun N.
    Le T.M.Q.
    Saleem N.
    Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 2024, 26 (02) : 276 - 309
  • [48] Deaths From COVID-19 in Rural, Micropolitan, and Metropolitan Areas: A County-Level Comparison
    Karim, Saleema A.
    Chen, Hsueh-Fen
    JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2021, 37 (01): : 124 - 132
  • [49] County-level longitudinal clustering of COVID-19 mortality to incidence ratio in the United States
    Nasim Vahabi
    Masoud Salehi
    Julio D. Duarte
    Abolfazl Mollalo
    George Michailidis
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [50] County-Level Social Vulnerability Is Associated with Increased Risk for Venous Thromboembolism in COVID-19
    Meena, Richard A.
    Di, Mengyu
    Wiley, Zanthia
    Gaddh, Manila
    Patzer, Rachel E.
    Alabi, Olamide
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2021, 233 (05) : S319 - S319