Persistent organic pollutant exposure as a risk factor of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Kouiti, Malak [1 ,2 ]
Castillo-Hermoso, Maria Angeles [1 ]
Youlyouz-Marfak, Ibtissam [2 ]
Khan, Khalid Saeed [1 ,3 ]
Thangaratinam, Shakila [4 ,5 ]
Olmedo-Requena, Rocio [1 ,3 ,6 ,8 ]
Zamora, Javier [3 ,4 ,5 ,7 ]
Jimenez-Moleon, Jose Juan [1 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Med Prevent & Salud Publ, Granada, Spain
[2] Hassan First Univ Settat, Higher Inst Hlth Sci, Lab Hlth Sci & Technol, Settat, Morocco
[3] Consorcio Ctr Invest Biomed Red Epidemiol & Salud, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Birmingham, Inst Metab & Syst Res, Birmingham, England
[5] Birmingham Womens & Childrens Natl Hlth Serv Fdn T, Birmingham, England
[6] Inst Invest Biosanitaria Ibs GRANADA, Granada, Spain
[7] Hosp Ramon Y Cajal IRYCIS, Clin Biostat Unit, Madrid, Spain
[8] Univ Granada, Dept Med Prevent & Salud Publ, Avda Invest 11,Edificio A, Granada 18016, Spain
关键词
exposure; gestational diabetes mellitus; meta-analysis; persistent organic pollutants; risk factor; systematic review; NESTED CASE-CONTROL; POLYCHLORINATED-BIPHENYLS; ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES; SERUM CONCENTRATIONS; GLUCOSE-HOMEOSTASIS; EARLY-PREGNANCY; ASSOCIATION; SUBSTANCES; TOLERANCE; DIOXINS;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.17725
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundFindings related to the association between persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are inconclusive.ObjectivesTo estimate the strength of the association between POP exposure and GDM in a systematic review with meta-analysis.Search strategyMEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science were searched until July 2023.Selection criteriaCohort and case-control studies analysing the association between POPs and GDM.Data collection and analysisWe assessed the risk of bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies scale (QUIPS). Standardised mean differences were pooled using random-effect models.Main resultsSixteen articles including 12 216 participants were selected. The risk of bias was high in four articles (25%), moderate in 11 (68.75%) and low in one (6.25%). Small mean difference between GDM cases and controls was observed for PFHpA (0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-0.35, I2 = 0.0%), PCB180 (0.37, 95% CI 0.19-0.56; I2 = 25.3%), BDE47 (0.23, 95% CI 0.0-0.45, I2 = 0%), BDE99 (0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.59; I2 = 0%), BDE100 (0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.64; I2 = 0%) and HCB (0.22, 95% CI 0.01-0.42, I2 = 39.6%). No considerable difference was observed for the rest of POPs.ConclusionSmall mean differences between GDM cases and controls were observed for some POPs. However, evidence shows mostly moderate quality and results were heterogeneous. Improved research methodology is needed to assess POPs and GDM risk.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 588
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A portrait of gestational diabetes mellitus in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Iser, Betine Pinto Moehlecke
    Stein, Caroline
    Alves, Luisia Feichas
    Carvalho, Morgana Lourenco de Souza
    Espinoza, Sergio Angelo Rojas
    Schmidt, Maria Ines
    ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY METABOLISM, 2022, 67 (06):
  • [32] Homocysteine level and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Yang
    Deng, Hai-Yan
    Qiao, Zeng-Yong
    Gong, Fang-Xiao
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 37 (11) : 987 - 994
  • [33] GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS AND PLACENTAL WEIGHT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Arcot, Amrita
    Parks, Kalynn
    Beck, Celeste
    Gallagher, Kelly
    Gernand, Alison D.
    PLACENTA, 2023, 140 : E32 - E33
  • [34] Visfatin level and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yong-Kuan
    Deng, Hai-Yan
    Qiao, Zeng-Yong
    Gong, Fang-Xiao
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 127 (05) : 468 - 478
  • [35] Proteomics Studies in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sriboonvorakul, Natthida
    Hu, Jiamiao
    Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn
    Ng, Leong Loke
    Tan, Bee Kang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (10)
  • [36] Effect of Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Poolsup, Nalinee
    Suksomboon, Naeti
    Amin, Muhammad
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [37] Interventions for Preventing Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Oostdam, Nicolette
    van Poppel, Mireille N. M.
    Wouters, Maurice G. A. J.
    van Mechelen, Willem
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2011, 20 (10) : 1551 - 1563
  • [38] The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Bangladesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Begum, Rahima
    Roy, Sourav
    Banik, Sujan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIABETES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2022, 42 (04) : 606 - 613
  • [39] Refining the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Francis, Ellen C.
    Powe, Camille E.
    Lowe, William L., Jr.
    White, Sara L.
    Scholtens, Denise M.
    Yang, Jiaxi
    Zhu, Yeyi
    Zhang, Cuilin
    Hivert, Marie-France
    Kwak, Soo Heon
    Sweeting, Arianne
    COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE, 2023, 3 (01):
  • [40] Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Pakistan: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Adnan, Muhammad
    Aasim, Muhammad
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)