Identification of Wheat Ideotype under Multiple Abiotic Stresses and Complex Environmental Interplays by Multivariate Analysis Techniques

被引:5
|
作者
Al-Ashkar, Ibrahim [1 ]
Sallam, Mohammed [1 ]
Ibrahim, Abdullah [1 ]
Ghazy, Abdelhalim [1 ]
Al-Suhaibani, Nasser [1 ]
Ben Romdhane, Walid [1 ]
Al-Doss, Abdullah [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Food & Agr Sci, Dept Plant Prod, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
来源
PLANTS-BASEL | 2023年 / 12卷 / 20期
关键词
genetic stability; heatmap; ideotype; multiple abiotic stresses; MGIDI; WAASB index; MEAN PERFORMANCE; SELECTION; TOLERANCE; STABILITY; DROUGHT; MGIDI; AMMI;
D O I
10.3390/plants12203540
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Multiple abiotic stresses negatively impact wheat production all over the world. We need to increase productivity by 60% to provide food security to the world population of 9.6 billion by 2050; it is surely time to develop stress-tolerant genotypes with a thorough comprehension of the genetic basis and the plant's capacity to tolerate these stresses and complex environmental reactions. To approach these goals, we used multivariate analysis techniques, the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model for prediction, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to enhance the reliability of the classification, multi-trait genotype-ideotype distance index (MGIDI) to detect the ideotype, and the weighted average of absolute scores (WAASB) index to recognize genotypes with stability that are highly productive. Six tolerance multi-indices were used to test twenty wheat genotypes grown under multiple abiotic stresses. The AMMI model showed varying differences with performance indices, which disagreed with the trait and genotype differences used. The G01, G12, G16, and G02 were selected as the appropriate and stable genotypes using the MGIDI with the six tolerance multi-indices. The biplot features the genotypes (G01, G03, G11, G16, G17, G18, and G20) that were most stable and had high tolerance across the environments. The pooled analyses (LDA, MGIDI, and WAASB) showed genotype G01 as the most stable candidate. The genotype (G01) is considered a novel genetic resource for improving productivity and stabilizing wheat programs under multiple abiotic stresses. Hence, these techniques, if used in an integrated manner, strongly support the plant breeders in multi-environment trials.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Responses of rice plant to multiple abiotic stresses revealed by transcriptome meta-analysis and identification of novel genetic factors
    Ahmdikhah, Asadollah
    Safaeizadeh, Mehdi
    Tehranian, Alireza S.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [42] Genome-wide identification and expression-pattern analysis of sulfate transporter (SULTR) gene family in cotton under multiple abiotic stresses and fiber development
    Chen, Yu
    Xiao, Xianghui
    Yang, Rui
    Sun, Zhihao
    Yang, Shuhan
    Zhang, Haibo
    Xing, Baoguang
    Li, Yanfang
    Liu, Qiankun
    Lu, Quanwei
    Shi, Yuzhen
    Yuan, Youlu
    Miao, Chen
    Li, Pengtao
    FUNCTIONAL & INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS, 2024, 24 (03)
  • [43] Identification of the trehalose-6-phosphate synthase gene family in Medicago truncatula and expression analysis under abiotic stresses
    Song, Jianbo
    Mao, Hanyi
    Cheng, Jie
    Zhou, Yong
    Chen, Rongrong
    Zeng, Liming
    Li, Hua
    Wang, Yihua
    GENE, 2021, 787
  • [44] Identification of Stress Responsive NAC Genes in Casuarina equisetifolia L. and Its Expression Analysis under Abiotic Stresses
    Li, Xiaomei
    Li, Nan
    Wen, Dandan
    Yu, Jianfeng
    Hong, Jiadu
    Wu, Mengjie
    Cheng, Longjun
    Meng, Shuai
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [45] Genomic Survey of PEBP Gene Family in Rice: Identification, Phylogenetic Analysis, and Expression Profiles in Organs and under Abiotic Stresses
    Zhao, Chunyu
    Zhu, Mo
    Guo, Yanying
    Sun, Jian
    Ma, Wenhong
    Wang, Xiaoxue
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (12):
  • [46] Genome-wide identification of the AAT gene family in quinoa and analysis of its expression pattern under abiotic stresses
    Li, Hanxue
    Jiang, Chunhe
    Liu, Junna
    Zhang, Ping
    Li, Li
    Li, Rongbo
    Huang, Liubin
    Wang, Xuqin
    Jiang, Guofei
    Bai, Yutao
    Zhang, Lingyuan
    Qin, Peng
    BMC GENOMICS, 2025, 26 (01):
  • [47] Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of the G-Protein Gene Family in Barley Under Abiotic Stresses
    Han, Ailing
    Xu, Zhengyuan
    Cai, Zhenyu
    Zheng, Yuling
    Chen, Mingjiong
    Wu, Liyuan
    Shen, Qiufang
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2024, 13 (24):
  • [48] Identification and Expression Analysis of the Nucleotidyl Transferase Protein (NTP) Family in Soybean (Glycine max) under Various Abiotic Stresses
    Kang, Liqing
    Li, Changgen
    Qin, Aokang
    Liu, Zehui
    Li, Xuanyue
    Zeng, Liming
    Yu, Hongyang
    Wang, Yihua
    Song, Jianbo
    Chen, Rongrong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2024, 25 (02)
  • [49] MYB transcription factors in alfalfa (Medicago sativa): genome-wide identification and expression analysis under abiotic stresses
    Zhou, Qiang
    Jia, Chenglin
    Ma, Wenxue
    Cui, Yue
    Jin, Xiaoyu
    Luo, Dong
    Min, Xueyang
    Liu, Zhipeng
    PEERJ, 2019, 7
  • [50] The WRKY transcription factors in the diploid woodland strawberry Fragaria vesca: Identification and expression analysis under biotic and abiotic stresses
    Wei, Wei
    Hu, Yang
    Han, Yong-Tao
    Zhang, Kai
    Zhao, Feng-Li
    Feng, Jia-Yue
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2016, 105 : 129 - 144