Analyzing SDG interlinkages: identifying trade-offs and synergies for a responsible innovation

被引:2
|
作者
Luttikhuis, Nikki [1 ,2 ]
Wiebe, Kirsten S. [1 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF, Sustainable Energy Technol, POB 4760, N-7465 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Ind Econ & Technol Management, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Sustainable Development Goals; Agenda; 2030; RI; Point of care; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS; CARE; POINT; CHALLENGES; FRAMEWORK; HEALTH; ENERGY; CELLS;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-023-01336-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper responds to recent calls to address the indivisible nature of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) framework and the related knowledge gap on how SDG targets interlink with each other. It examines how SDG targets interact in the context of a specific technology, point of care (PoC) microfluidics, and how this relates to the concept of responsible innovation (RI). The novel SDG interlinkages methodology developed here involves several steps to filter the relevant interlinkages and a focus group of experts for discussing these interlinkages. The main findings indicate that several social synergies occur when deploying PoC microfluidics, but that the environmental trade-offs may jeopardize the total progress toward the SDGs. More specifically, the environmental sacrifices (use of plastics and lack of recyclability) resulted in the product being cheaper and, thus, better accessible. This work suggests that attention should be given (and prioritized) to the use of renewable and recyclable materials without jeopardizing the accessibility of the product. This should minimize the identified trade-offs. These findings inform how analyzing SDG interlinkages relates to the responsibilities and dimensions of RI in several ways. First, analyzing SDG interlinkages helps to execute the governance responsibility by using the RI dimensions (anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion and responsiveness). Second, analyzing SDG interlinkages gives insights into if and how a technology relates to the do-good and avoid-harm responsibility. This is important to assess the responsiveness of the technology to ensure that the technology can become truly sustainable and leaves no one behind.
引用
收藏
页码:1813 / 1831
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On the trade-offs and synergies between forest carbon sequestration and substitution
    Sampo Soimakallio
    Tuomo Kalliokoski
    Aleksi Lehtonen
    Olli Salminen
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2021, 26
  • [42] Exploring the complex trade-offs and synergies of global ecosystem services
    Wang, Jinnan
    Wu, Wenjun
    Yang, Meng
    Gao, Yueming
    Shao, Jiacheng
    Yang, Weishan
    Ma, Guoxia
    Yu, Fang
    Yao, Nan
    Jiang, Hongqiang
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ECOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21
  • [43] Theoretical Research on Circular Economy and Sustainability Trade-Offs and Synergies
    Morales, Manuel E.
    Batlles-delaFuente, Ana
    Cortes-Garcia, Francisco Joaquin
    Belmonte-Urena, Luis Jesus
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [44] Methodological approaches on synergies and trade-offs within the 2030 Agenda
    Assubayeva, Aliya
    Marco, Jorge
    ISCIENCE, 2024, 27 (11)
  • [45] Synergies and Trade-Offs in the Production of NWFPs Predicted in Boreal Forests
    Kurttila, Mikko
    Pukkala, Timo
    Miina, Jari
    FORESTS, 2018, 9 (07)
  • [46] Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica
    Locatelli, Bruno
    Imbach, Pablo
    Wunder, Sven
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 41 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [47] Risk and sustainability: trade-offs and synergies for robust decision making
    Hauschild, Michael Z.
    McKone, Thomas E.
    Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Karsten
    Hald, Tine
    Nielsen, Bo F.
    Mabit, Stefan E.
    Fantke, Peter
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2022, 34 (01)
  • [48] Mastering Innovation's Toughest Trade-Offs
    Bingham, Christopher B.
    Mcdonald, Rory M.
    MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2022, 63 (04) : 66 - 72
  • [49] Learning and innovation: Exploitation and exploration trade-offs
    Kim, Changsu
    Song, Jaeyong
    Nerkar, Atul
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2012, 65 (08) : 1189 - 1194
  • [50] Resolving Ethics Trade-offs in Implementing Responsible AI
    Sanderson, Conrad
    Schleiger, Emma
    Douglas, David
    Kuhnert, Petra
    Lu, Qinghua
    2024 IEEE CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, CAI 2024, 2024, : 1208 - 1213