Complications related to the access site after transaxillary implantation of a microaxial left ventricular assist device

被引:7
|
作者
Lewin, Daniel [1 ,10 ]
Nersesian, Gaik [1 ,7 ]
Lanmueller, Pia [1 ,7 ]
Schoenrath, Felix [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Falk, Volkmar [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Potapov, Evgenij V. [1 ,7 ]
Ott, Sascha [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,9 ]
机构
[1] German Heart Ctr Berlin, Dept Cardiothorac & Vasc Surg, Berlin, Germany
[2] German Heart Ctr Berlin, Dept Cardiac Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Berlin, Germany
[3] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Berlin, Germany
[4] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[5] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[6] Berlin Inst Hlth BIH, Berlin, Germany
[7] DZHK German Ctr Cardiovasc Res, Partnersite Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[8] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Translat Med, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol Translat Cardiovasc Techn, Zurich, Switzerland
[9] Charite Univ med Berlin, Dept Cardiac Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Berlin, Germany
[10] German Heart Ctr Berlin, Dept Cardiothorac & Vasc Surg, Augustenburger Pl 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
来源
关键词
cardiogenic shock; mechanical circulatory; Impella; LVAD; outcome; prosthetic graft infection; SD; standard deviation; tMCS; temporary mechanical circulatory support; va-ECLS; veno-arterial extracorporeal life support; support; GRAFT INFECTIONS; MOBILIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2022.12.018
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Impella 5.0 and 5.5 (summarized as Impella 5+) are microaxial, catheter-based left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) that are implanted via a vascular graft sutured to the axillary artery and provide blood flow of up to 5.5 liter/min. This study aims to investigate the incidence of long-term complications following circulatory support with Impella 5+. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis of 203 consecutive adult patients treated between January 2017 and September 2021 with a surgically implanted Impella 5.0 or 5.5 via a vascular graft sutured to the axillary artery. RESULTS: The median Impella support duration was 8 days. Of 203 patients, 78 (38.4%) died while on temporary mechanical circulatory support. Fifty-five (27.1%) were successfully weaned from Impella 5+ and 70 (34.5%) were bridged to a durable LVAD with a median follow-up time of 232 (IQR 68.5, 597) days after Impella 5+ explantation. In 119 of these patients, the Impella was explanted and the vascular graft was shortened, ligated, and pushed under the pectoralis muscle; in 6 patients early graft infection prompted complete graft removal during explantation. In addition, 13 patients (10.9%) developed a late-onset graft infection after a median of 86 days, requiring complete (n = 10) or partial (n = 2) explantation of the retained graft. In 1 patient, the graft infection was successfully treated by conservative therapy. Our analysis identified no specific risk factors for graft infections. Of the 203 patients, 5 (2.5%) developed a brachial plexus injury resulting in neurological dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In 10.9% of patients, retaining the vascular graft was complicated by a late graft infection. Complete explantation of the graft prosthesis may decrease the infection rate, but may in turn increase the risk of brachial plexus injury. On the other hand, this method offers the possibility of bedside explantation. (c) 2022 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 687
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hospital readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Lesny, P.
    Luknar, M.
    Simovicova, V.
    Dankova, M.
    Goncalvesova, E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2018, 20 : 91 - 91
  • [32] Hospital readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Heim, Christian
    Mekkhala, Nattipong
    Kondruweit, Markus
    Weyand, Michael
    Tandler, Rene
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 100 (07) : S41 - S41
  • [33] Postoperative management after implantation of a left ventricular assist device
    Pilarczyk, K.
    Pizanis, N.
    Kamler, M.
    Jakob, H. G.
    Beyersdorf, F.
    Trummer, G.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HERZ THORAX UND GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 2014, 28 (05): : 337 - 346
  • [34] Changes in Spirometry After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Mohamedali, Burhan
    Bhat, Geetha
    Yost, Gardner
    Tatooles, Antone
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2015, 39 (12) : 1046 - 1050
  • [35] Pulmonary embolism after implantation of the left ventricular assist device
    Xiong, Xinghui
    Zhou, Ruihao
    Deng, Lijing
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 47 (09) : 4226 - 4228
  • [36] Cavitation During Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device Is Worth Considering
    Nordan, Taylor
    Kapur, Navin K.
    Kawabori, Masashi
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 115 (03): : 801 - 801
  • [37] Theoretical Considerations on Cavitation During Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Condello, Ignazio
    Basile, Marco
    Speziale, Giuseppe
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 115 (03): : 800 - 801
  • [38] Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation:: The need for an implantable right ventricular assist device
    Furukawa, K
    Motomura, T
    Nosé, Y
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2005, 29 (05) : 369 - 377
  • [39] Prediction of right ventricular dysfunction after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Nakatani, S
    Thomas, JD
    Savage, RM
    Vargo, RL
    Smedira, NG
    McCarthy, PM
    CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (09) : 216 - 221
  • [40] Predictors of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Koprivanac, Marijan
    Kelava, Marta
    Siric, Franjo
    Cruz, Vincent B.
    Moazami, Nader
    Mihaljevic, Tomislav
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 55 (06) : 587 - 595