共 50 条
The prevalence and risk factors of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
被引:11
|作者:
Wang, Hong-Fei
[1
]
Wang, Yan-Yun
[2
,3
]
Li, Zhi-Yu
[4
]
He, Pei-Jie
[5
]
Liu, Shan
[6
]
Li, Qiu-Shuang
[6
,7
]
机构:
[1] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Sch Clin Med 1, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Tradit Chinese Med Hosp Ningbo, Ningbo, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Zhejiang Prov Hosp Chinese Med, Dept Nephrol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Zhejiang Prov Hosp Chinese Med, Ctr Clin Evaluat & Anal, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[7] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Zhejiang Prov Hosp Chinese Med, Ctr Clin Evaluat & Anal, 54 Youdian Rd, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词:
Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease;
prevalence;
risk factors;
systematic review;
meta-analysis;
CITRULLINATED PEPTIDE ANTIBODIES;
EXTRAARTICULAR MANIFESTATIONS;
CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS;
LEFLUNOMIDE USE;
AIR-POLLUTION;
COHORT;
BIAS;
D O I:
10.1080/07853890.2024.2332406
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
BackgroundInterstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most widespread and fatal pulmonary complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Existing knowledge on the prevalence and risk factors of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is inconclusive. Therefore, we designed this review to address this gap.Materials and MethodsTo find relevant observational studies discussing the prevalence and/or risk factors of RA-ILD, EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were explored. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) / hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with a fixed/ random effects model. While subgroup analysis, meta-regression analysis and sensitivity analysis were carried out to determine the sources of heterogeneity, the I2 statistic was utilized to assess between-studies heterogeneity. Funnel plots and Egger's test were employed to assess publication bias. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, our review was conducted.ResultsA total of 56 studies with 11,851 RA-ILD patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of RA-ILD was 18.7% (95% CI 15.8-21.6) with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 96.4%). The prevalence of RA-ILD was found to be more likely as a result of several identified factors, including male sex (ORs = 1.92 95% CI 1.70-2.16), older age (WMDs = 6.89, 95% CI 3.10-10.67), having a smoking history (ORs =1.91, 95% CI 1.48-2.47), pulmonary comorbidities predicted (HRs = 2.08, 95% CI 1.89-2.30), longer RA duration (ORs = 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05), older age of RA onset (WMDs =4.46, 95% CI 0.63-8.29), positive RF (HRs = 1.15, 95%CI 0.75-1.77; ORs = 2.11, 95%CI 1.65-2.68), positive ACPA (ORs = 2.11, 95%CI 1.65-2.68), higher ESR (ORs = 1.008, 95%CI 1.002-1.014), moderate and high DAS28 (>= 3.2) (ORs = 1.87, 95%CI 1.36-2.58), rheumatoid nodules (ORs = 1.87, 95% CI 1.18-2.98), LEF use (ORs = 1.42, 95%CI 1.08-1.87) and steroid use (HRs= 1.70, 1.13-2.55). The use of biological agents was a protective factor (HRs = 0.77, 95% CI 0.69-0.87).Conclusion(s)The pooled prevalence of RA-ILD in our study was approximately 18.7%. Furthermore, we identified 13 risk factors for RA-ILD, including male sex, older age, having a smoking history, pulmonary comorbidities, older age of RA onset, longer RA duration, positive RF, positive ACPA, higher ESR, moderate and high DAS28 (>= 3.2), rheumatoid nodules, LEF use and steroid use. Additionally, biological agents use was a protective factor.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文