Deglutologist Practices and Perceptions of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale: A Survey Study

被引:0
|
作者
Burdick, Ryan [1 ,2 ]
Pena-Chavez, Rodolfo [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Namasivayam-MacDonald, Ashwini [3 ]
Rogus-Pulia, Nicole [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Med, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Div Geriatr & Gerontol, 1685 Highland Ave,5158 Med Fdn Centennial Bldg, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[2] William S Middleton Vet Hosp, Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr GRECC, Madison, WI 53719 USA
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Togo Salmon Hall 331,1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Bio Bio, Fac Ciencias Salud & Alimentos, Dept Ciencias Rehabil Salud, Concepcion, Chile
关键词
Penetration-Aspiration Scale; Speech and language pathologists; Dysphagia; Swallowing disorders; Survey; FIBEROPTIC ENDOSCOPIC EVALUATION; RELATIVE RISK; RELIABILITY; PSYCHOLOGY; MECHANISMS; DYSPHAGIA;
D O I
10.1007/s00455-023-10637-3
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Successful dysphagia management requires accurate, succinct diagnosis and characterization of swallowing safety impairments. However, the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) remains the only available tool developed exclusively for assessment of airway protection. To best support efforts to advance the field's understanding of swallowing safety, it is crucial to understand current clinician practice patterns, perceptions, and accuracy regarding the PAS. A 46-item survey was developed and distributed to deglutologists internationally examining: (1) Demographics; (2) Scale Practices; (3) Swallowing Safety Priorities; (4) Scale Perceptions; and (5) Accuracy. The first four sections consisted of questionnaires. In the optional fifth section, respondents were asked to score five videos of swallows collected via videofluoroscopy and previously PAS-scored by two trained raters. In total, 335 responses were analyzed. The majority of respondents self-reported PAS training (84%); 90% of untrained respondents were receptive to training. Respondents reported using the PAS "always" (40%) or "frequently" (29%), and that the PAS carries "a great deal of" weight in assessment (40%). Reported application of the PAS was heterogeneous, with the most common approach being "single worst score per unique presentation" (45%). Most respondents (64%) prioritized a parameter not captured by the PAS. Untrained respondents were significantly more confident with PAS ratings than trained respondents (X2 = 7.47; p = 0.006). Of 1460 PAS ratings provided, 364 of them were accurate (25%) when compared to ratings by trained lab members. Results of this survey reflect ubiquitous use of the PAS, unmet needs for assessment of swallowing safety, low accuracy despite generally high confidence, and heterogenous training that does not correspond to confidence. This emphasizes the need for additional training in clinical application of the PAS as well as development of novel metrics to optimize assessments of swallowing safety.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 533
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Within-Bolus Variability of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale Across Two Subsequent Swallows in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
    Johanna Hedström
    Lisa Tuomi
    Mats Andersson
    Hans Dotevall
    Hanna Osbeck
    Caterina Finizia
    Dysphagia, 2017, 32 : 683 - 690
  • [32] Within-Bolus Variability of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale Across Two Subsequent Swallows in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
    Hedstrom, Johanna
    Tuomi, Lisa
    Andersson, Mats
    Dotevall, Hans
    Osbeck, Hanna
    Finizia, Caterina
    DYSPHAGIA, 2017, 32 (05) : 683 - 690
  • [33] The effect of liquid consistency on penetration-aspiration: a Bayesian analysis of two large datasets
    Borders, James C.
    Steele, Catriona M.
    FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES, 2024, 5
  • [34] Predictors of Penetration-Aspiration in Parkinson's Disease Patients With Dysphagia: A Retrospective Analysis
    Gaeckle, Maren
    Domahs, Frank
    Kartmann, Angelika
    Tomandl, Bernd
    Frank, Ulrike
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 128 (08): : 728 - 735
  • [35] Swallowing Mechanics Associated With Artificial Airways, Bolus Properties, and Penetration-Aspiration Status in Trauma Patients
    Dietsch, Angela M.
    Rowley, Christopher B.
    Solomon, Nancy Pearl
    Pearson, William G., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2017, 60 (09): : 2442 - 2451
  • [36] Risk factors for laryngeal penetration-aspiration in patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury
    Ihalainen, Tiina
    Rinta-Kiikka, Irina
    Luoto, Teemu M.
    Thesleff, Tuomo
    Helminen, Mika
    Korpijaakko-Huuhka, Anna-Maija
    Ronkainen, Antti
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (01): : 81 - 87
  • [37] Reliability of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale and Temporal and Clearance Measures in Poststroke Dysphagia: Videofluoroscopic Analysis From the Swallowing Treatment using Electrical Pharyngeal Stimulation Trial
    Everton, Lisa F.
    Benfield, Jacqueline K.
    Michou, Emilia
    Hamdy, Shaheen
    Bath, Philip M.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2022, 65 (03): : 858 - 868
  • [38] Scoring the Penetration–Aspiration Scale (PAS) in Two Conditions: A Reliability Study
    Munirah Alkhuwaiter
    Kate Davidson
    Theresa Hopkins-Rossabi
    Bonnie Martin-Harris
    Dysphagia, 2022, 37 : 407 - 416
  • [39] Risk factors for laryngeal penetration-aspiration in patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: methodological issues
    Safiri, Saeid
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (12): : 1956 - 1956
  • [40] Classification of Penetration-Aspiration Versus Healthy Swallows Using Dual-Axis Swallowing Accelerometry Signals in Dysphagic Subjects
    Sejdic, Ervin
    Steele, Catriona M.
    Chau, Tom
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 60 (07) : 1859 - 1866