Factors influencing the cleaning of plant samples with ultrasonic technology

被引:4
|
作者
Rodriguez-Alonso, Javier [1 ]
Cabrales-Garcia, Cristina [1 ]
Millan, Rocio [1 ]
机构
[1] CIEMAT, Dept Environm DMA, Ave Complutense 40, Madrid 28040, Spain
关键词
Cleaning procedures; leaf pubescence; plant samples; TRACE-ELEMENTS; WASHING PROCEDURES; HUMAN HAIR; MERCURY; REMOVAL; ALMADEN; FOLIAR; DUST; VALDEAZOGUES; DEPOSITION;
D O I
10.1080/15226514.2022.2085241
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Effective cleaning of biological samples is a critical step in environmental studies. However, the literature lacks standardized cleaning procedures and protocols and there is little information about how even the most basic conditions may affect cleaning efficiency. Here, leaves of different species were first exposed to the soil naturally containing mercury particles and then washed in an ultrasound water bath under the following conditions: newly cleaned/reused beakers, water temperature, sample immersion/free-floating, sample quantity, and the number of washing cycles. Additionally, the effects of sample pubescence on cleaning efficacy were also assessed. Results indicated that the best cleaning efficacy was recorded when samples were placed in cold water under forced immersion and beakers were cleaned between washing cycles. At least two of these three conditions were needed for adequate washing. The results also indicated that, for the glabrous leaves, a cumulative leaf surface area of <= 10,000 mm(2) was efficiently cleaned after 3-5 washing cycles, while as pubescence increased, 9-11 cycles were needed and often the sample quantity had to be reduced (<5,000 mm(2)). Our experiments reveal that cleaning can be optimized by applying easy procedures and according to individual sample typology, resulting in faster and more effective cleaning. Novelty statement The cleaning of samples is a frequent stage in the analytical processes of phytoremediation studies. This work provides new and valuable information to optimize the cleaning of plant samples by simply applying ultrasonic technology and distilled water. In fact, we have tested the influence of some factors never taken into account previously.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 367
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ULTRASONIC CLEANING PLANT
    不详
    CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY, 1954, (31) : 948 - 948
  • [2] Mechanisms and factors influencing the ultrasonic cleaning of particle-fouled ceramic membranes
    Lamminen, MO
    Walker, HW
    Weavers, LK
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2004, 237 (1-2) : 213 - 223
  • [3] Main influencing factors of automobile fuel consumption testing with ultrasonic technology
    School of Automotive and Transportation Engineering, Heilongjiang Institute of Technology, Harbin
    150050, China
    不详
    150001, China
    Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao, 16 (173-179):
  • [4] New ultrasonic technology enhances cleaning
    不详
    HYDRAULICS & PNEUMATICS, 1997, 50 (07) : 10 - &
  • [5] Prepare for brazing aluminium samples by ultrasonic cleaning
    Dimitescu, A.
    Babis, C.
    Alecusan, A. M.
    Chivu, O.
    MODTECH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE - MODERN TECHNOLOGIES IN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING VI (MODTECH 2018), 2018, 400
  • [6] Influencing factors of endoscopic cleaning efficiency
    WANG Wei
    ZHOU Pingle
    ZHONG Mingwei
    中西医结合护理(中英文), 2016, 2 (02) : 1 - 3
  • [7] Research on Ultrasonic Cleaning Technology of Optical Components
    Jiao Lingyan
    Tong Yi
    Cui Ying
    Chen Jianhua
    Bai Qingguang
    7TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCED OPTICAL MANUFACTURING AND TESTING TECHNOLOGIES: ADVANCED OPTICAL MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 9281
  • [8] Factors influencing the cleaning of ultrafiltration and microfiltration units
    Hartje, K.
    Chemie-Technik (Heidelberg), 1995, 24 (01): : 32 - 33
  • [9] KERRY CAROUSEL-TYPE ULTRASONIC CLEANING PLANT
    不详
    MACHINERY AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 1969, 115 (2968): : 544 - &
  • [10] Ultrasonic Extraction Chuanxiong polysaccharide of Influencing Factors
    Bi, Yong-guang
    Liu, Chun-chun
    ADVANCES IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING II, PTS 1-4, 2012, 550-553 : 1071 - 1075