Evaluation of the Performance of CMIP6 Climate Models in Simulating Rainfall over the Philippines

被引:2
|
作者
Ignacio-Reardon, Shelly Jo Igpuara [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Jing-jia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Inst Climate & Applicat Res ICAR, CIC FEMD, KLME,ILCEC, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Coll Atmospher Sci, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[3] Tallahasee Community Coll, Sci & Math Dept, Tallahassee, FL 32304 USA
关键词
CMIP6; rainy season; rain simulations; bias; Philippines; MONSOON; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/atmos14091459
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Philippines is highly vulnerable to multiple climate-related hazards due to its geographical location and weak adaptation measures. Floods are the most catastrophic hazards that impact lives, livelihoods, and, consequently, the economy at large. Understanding the ability of the general circulation models to simulate the observed rainfall using the latest state-of-the-art model is essential for reliable forecasting. Based on this background, this paper objectively aims at assessing and ranking the capabilities of the recent Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) models in simulating the observed rainfall over the Philippines. The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) v2.3 was used as a proxy to gauge the performance of 11 CMIP6 models in simulating the annual and rainy-season rainfall during 1980-2014. Several statistical metrics (mean, standard deviation, normalized root means square error, percentage bias, Pearson correlation coefficient, Mann-Kendall test, Theil-Sen slope estimator, and skill score) and geospatial measures were assessed. The results show that that CMIP6 historical simulations exhibit satisfactory effectiveness in simulating the annual cycle, though some models display wet/dry biases. The CMIP6 models generally underestimate rainfall on the land but overestimate it over the ocean. The trend analysis shows that rainfall over the country is insignificantly increasing both annually and during the rainy seasons. Notably, most of the models could correctly simulate the trend sign but over/underestimate the magnitude. The CMIP6 historical rainfall simulating models significantly agree on simulating the mean annual cycle but diverge in temporal ability simulation. The performance of the models remarkably differs from one metric to another and among different time scales. Nevertheless, the models may be ranked from the best to the least best at simulating the Philippines' rainfall in the order GFDL, NOR, ACCESS, ENS, MRI, CMCC, NESM, FIO, MIROC, CESM, TAI, and CAN. The findings of this study form a good basis for the selection of models to be used in robust future climate projection and impact studies regarding the Philippines. The climate model developers may use the documented shortcoming of these models and improve their physical parametrization for better performance in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance Evaluation of CMIP6 Models in Simulating the Dynamic Processes of Arctic-Tropical Climate Connection During Winter
    Sun, Bo
    Li, Wanling
    Wang, Huijun
    Xue, Rufan
    Zhou, Siyu
    Zheng, Yi
    Cai, Jiarui
    Tang, Wenchao
    Dai, Yongling
    Huang, Yuetong
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2024, 129 (17)
  • [32] Performance of CMIP6 in rainfall simulation over Didessa, Southwest Ethiopia
    Chala Hailu Sime
    Tamene Adugna Demissie
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2025, 18 (4)
  • [33] Evaluation of CMIP6 model skills in simulating tropical climate extremes over Malawi, Southern Africa
    Bernard Mmame
    Cosmo Ngongondo
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2024, 10 : 1695 - 1709
  • [34] Evaluation and comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 model performance in simulating the runoff
    Guo, Hai
    Zhan, Chesheng
    Ning, Like
    Li, Zhonghe
    Hu, Shi
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 149 (3-4) : 1451 - 1470
  • [35] Assessment of CMIP6 global climate models in reconstructing rainfall climatology of Bangladesh
    Kamruzzaman, Mohammad
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Roy, Dilip Kumar
    Islam, Abu Reza Md Towfiqul
    Hwang, Syewoon
    Cho, Jaepil
    Zaman, Md Asad Uz
    Sultana, Tasnim
    Rashid, Towhida
    Akter, Fatima
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (07) : 3928 - 3953
  • [36] Evaluation of CMIP6 model skills in simulating tropical climate extremes over Malawi, Southern Africa
    Mmame, Bernard
    Ngongondo, Cosmo
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 10 (02) : 1695 - 1709
  • [37] Evaluation and comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 model performance in simulating the runoff
    Hai Guo
    Chesheng Zhan
    Like Ning
    Zhonghe Li
    Shi Hu
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 149 : 1451 - 1470
  • [38] Evaluation of the CMIP6 Performance in Simulating Precipitation in the Amazon River Basin
    Monteverde, Corrie
    De Sales, Fernando
    Jones, Charles
    CLIMATE, 2022, 10 (08)
  • [39] Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models performance in simulating temperature in Northeast China
    He XiaMan
    Jiang Chao
    Wang Jun
    Wang XiangPing
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2022, 65 (11): : 4194 - 4207
  • [40] Evaluation of the Performance of CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models in Simulating the Victoria Mode-El Nino Relationship
    Wang, Zhenchao
    Han, Lin
    Zheng, Jiayu
    Ding, Ruiqiang
    Li, Jianping
    Hou, Zhaolu
    Chao, Jinghua
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (18) : 7625 - 7644