Evaluation of the Performance of CMIP6 Climate Models in Simulating Rainfall over the Philippines

被引:2
|
作者
Ignacio-Reardon, Shelly Jo Igpuara [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Jing-jia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Inst Climate & Applicat Res ICAR, CIC FEMD, KLME,ILCEC, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Coll Atmospher Sci, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[3] Tallahasee Community Coll, Sci & Math Dept, Tallahassee, FL 32304 USA
关键词
CMIP6; rainy season; rain simulations; bias; Philippines; MONSOON; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/atmos14091459
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Philippines is highly vulnerable to multiple climate-related hazards due to its geographical location and weak adaptation measures. Floods are the most catastrophic hazards that impact lives, livelihoods, and, consequently, the economy at large. Understanding the ability of the general circulation models to simulate the observed rainfall using the latest state-of-the-art model is essential for reliable forecasting. Based on this background, this paper objectively aims at assessing and ranking the capabilities of the recent Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) models in simulating the observed rainfall over the Philippines. The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) v2.3 was used as a proxy to gauge the performance of 11 CMIP6 models in simulating the annual and rainy-season rainfall during 1980-2014. Several statistical metrics (mean, standard deviation, normalized root means square error, percentage bias, Pearson correlation coefficient, Mann-Kendall test, Theil-Sen slope estimator, and skill score) and geospatial measures were assessed. The results show that that CMIP6 historical simulations exhibit satisfactory effectiveness in simulating the annual cycle, though some models display wet/dry biases. The CMIP6 models generally underestimate rainfall on the land but overestimate it over the ocean. The trend analysis shows that rainfall over the country is insignificantly increasing both annually and during the rainy seasons. Notably, most of the models could correctly simulate the trend sign but over/underestimate the magnitude. The CMIP6 historical rainfall simulating models significantly agree on simulating the mean annual cycle but diverge in temporal ability simulation. The performance of the models remarkably differs from one metric to another and among different time scales. Nevertheless, the models may be ranked from the best to the least best at simulating the Philippines' rainfall in the order GFDL, NOR, ACCESS, ENS, MRI, CMCC, NESM, FIO, MIROC, CESM, TAI, and CAN. The findings of this study form a good basis for the selection of models to be used in robust future climate projection and impact studies regarding the Philippines. The climate model developers may use the documented shortcoming of these models and improve their physical parametrization for better performance in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the performance of CMIP6 models in simulating precipitation over Morocco
    Ayt Ougougdal H.
    Bounoua L.
    Ech-chatir L.
    Yacoubi-Khebiza M.
    Mediterranean Geoscience Reviews, 2024, 6 (2) : 145 - 158
  • [2] Performance evaluation of CMIP6 HighResMIP models in simulating precipitation over Madagascar
    Randriatsara, Herijaona Hani-Roge Hundilida
    Hu, Zhenghua
    Xu, Xiyan
    Ayugi, Brian
    Sian, Kenny Thiam Choy Lim Kam
    Mumo, Richard
    Ongoma, Victor
    Holtanova, Eva
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2023, 43 (12) : 5401 - 5421
  • [3] An evaluation of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate models in simulating summer rainfall in the Southeast Asian monsoon domain
    Khadka, Dibesh
    Babel, Mukand S.
    Abatan, Abayomi A.
    Collins, Matthew
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (02) : 1181 - 1202
  • [4] Performance evaluation and ranking of CMIP6 global climate models over Vietnam
    Nguyen-Duy, Tung
    Ngo-Duc, Thanh
    Desmet, Quentin
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 14 (06) : 1831 - 1846
  • [5] Relative performance of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models in simulating rainfall in Peninsular Malaysia
    Sahar Hadi Pour
    Shamsuddin Shahid
    Mohammed Mainuddin
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 149 : 709 - 725
  • [6] Evaluation of the Performance of CMIP6 Models in Reproducing Rainfall Patterns over North Africa
    Babaousmail, Hassen
    Hou, Rongtao
    Ayugi, Brian
    Ojara, Moses
    Ngoma, Hamida
    Karim, Rizwan
    Rajasekar, Adharsh
    Ongoma, Victor
    ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (04)
  • [7] Relative performance of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models in simulating rainfall in Peninsular Malaysia
    Pour, Sahar Hadi
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Mainuddin, Mohammed
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 149 (1-2) : 709 - 725
  • [8] Performance evaluation of CMIP6 global climate models for selecting models for climate projection over Nigeria
    Shiru, Mohammed Sanusi
    Chung, Eun-Sung
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2021, 146 (1-2) : 599 - 615
  • [9] Performance evaluation of CMIP6 global climate models for selecting models for climate projection over Nigeria
    Mohammed Sanusi Shiru
    Eun-Sung Chung
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2021, 146 : 599 - 615
  • [10] Bias evaluation in rainfall over Southeast Asia in CMIP6 models
    Liu, Senfeng
    Raghavan, Srivatsan V.
    Ona, Bhenjamin Jordan
    Nguyen, Ngoc Son
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2023, 621