The clinical validity of miR-126 as a prognostic marker in epithelial ovarian cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Liu, Lin [1 ]
Han, Qing [2 ]
Cai, Jing [1 ]
Xiao, Man [1 ]
Huang, Da [3 ]
Cao, Jin [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] China Three Gorges Univ, Coll Clin Med Sci 1, Yichang, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Clin Lab, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, 1277 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan 430022, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
EOC; miR-126; PFI; prognostic; survival; MICRORNAS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000033085
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of gynecological cancer related death in females worldwide. Our previous study demonstrated that decreased expression of microRNA (miR-126) promoted ovarian cancer angiogenesis and invasion by targeting VEGF-A. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical validity of miR-126 as a prognostic marker for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patient concerns:The patients with EOC ranged in age from 27 to 79 years, with a mean age of 57 years. Diagnosis:All patients had never had chemotherapy or biotherapy, and the diagnoses were confirmed pathologically in all cases Methods:MiR-126 levels in EOC tissue and normal ovaries were determined by qRT-PCR. Its prognostic value was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results:In this study, we found that compared to normal tissues, miR-126 expression was lower in EOC tissues, particularly in omental metastases. Though in our previous study we found that miR-126 may inhibit proliferation and invasion in EOC cell lines, but in this study patients with elevated miR-126 expression exhibited poor overall survival and relapse free survival. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that miRNA-126 was an independent prognostic factor for poor relapse-free survival (P = .044). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve of miR-126 was 0.806 (95% confidence interval, 0.669-0.942). Conclusion:In this study, we established miR-126 as a potential independent biomarker for predicting recurrence in patients with EOC.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A miR-200 microRNA cluster as prognostic marker in advanced ovarian cancer
    Hu, Xiaoxia
    Macdonald, Dusten M.
    Huettner, Phyllis C.
    Feng, Zhihui
    El Naqa, Issam M.
    Schwarz, Julie K.
    Mutch, David G.
    Grigsby, Perry W.
    Powell, Simon N.
    Wang, Xiaowei
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 114 (03) : 457 - 464
  • [42] Long non-coding RNA LNC01133 promotes the tumorigenesis of ovarian cancer by sponging miR-126
    Hou, Bing
    Hou, Xiaoling
    Ni, Hailai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2018, 11 (12): : 5809 - 5819
  • [43] Genetic variants within miR-126 and miR-335 are not associated with breast cancer risk
    Yang, Rongxi
    Dick, Michelle
    Marme, Frederik
    Schneeweiss, Andreas
    Langheinz, Anne
    Hemminki, Kari
    Sutter, Christian
    Bugert, Peter
    Wappenschmidt, Barbara
    Varon, Raymonda
    Schott, Sarah
    Weber, Bernhard H. F.
    Niederacher, Dieter
    Arnold, Norbert
    Meindl, Alfons
    Bartram, Claus R.
    Schmutzler, Rita K.
    Mueller, Heiko
    Arndt, Volker
    Brenner, Hermann
    Sohn, Christof
    Burwinkel, Barbara
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2011, 127 (02) : 549 - 554
  • [44] Steroid and Xenobiotic Receptor (SXR) as a possible prognostic marker in epithelial ovarian cancer
    Yue, Xiaoni
    Akahira, Jun-ichi
    Utsunomiya, Hiroki
    Miki, Yasuhiro
    Takahashi, Naomi
    Niikura, Hitoshi
    Ito, Kiyoshi
    Sasano, Hironobu
    Okamura, Kunihiro
    Yaegashi, Nobuo
    PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 60 (05) : 400 - 406
  • [45] miR-107 and miR-126 and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Study
    Gupta, Priyanka
    Sambyal, Vasudha
    Bali, Jagmohan Singh
    Guleria, Kamlesh
    Uppal, Manjit Singh
    Sudan, Meena
    GENETIC TESTING AND MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS, 2024, 28 (04) : 165 - 168
  • [46] Genetic variants within miR-126 and miR-335 are not associated with breast cancer risk
    Rongxi Yang
    Michelle Dick
    Frederik Marme
    Andreas Schneeweiss
    Anne Langheinz
    Kari Hemminki
    Christian Sutter
    Peter Bugert
    Barbara Wappenschmidt
    Raymonda Varon
    Sarah Schott
    Bernhard H. F. Weber
    Dieter Niederacher
    Norbert Arnold
    Alfons Meindl
    Claus R. Bartram
    Rita K. Schmutzler
    Heiko Müller
    Volker Arndt
    Hermann Brenner
    Christof Sohn
    Barbara Burwinkel
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2011, 127 : 549 - 554
  • [47] Association of miR-126 with soluble mesothelin-related peptides: a novel marker for malignant mesothelioma
    Sartini, D.
    Santarelli, L.
    Strafella, E.
    Staffolani, S.
    Amati, M.
    Morganti, S.
    Pozzi, V.
    Carbonari, D.
    Bracci, M.
    Pignotti, E.
    Mazzanti, P.
    Sabbatini, A.
    Ranaldi, R.
    Gasparini, S.
    Neuzil, J.
    Tomasetti, M.
    Emanuelli, M.
    FEBS JOURNAL, 2011, 278 : 232 - 232
  • [48] Expression and short-term prognostic value of miR-126 and miR-182 in patients with acute stroke
    Qi, Ruigang
    Liu, Haihua
    Liu, Chenglong
    Xu, Yingying
    Liu, Chunfeng
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2020, 19 (01) : 527 - 534
  • [49] Clinical correlation of plasma miR-21, miR-126 and miR-148a in patients with lupus nephritis
    Guo, Shuiming
    Ge, Shuwang
    Ku, Ming
    Shang, Weifeng
    Zeng, Rui
    Han, Min
    Xu, Gang
    Rong, Song
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (02): : 2905 - U7186
  • [50] Evaluation of the Expression Level and Hormone Receptor Association of miR-126 in Breast Cancer
    Maedeh Rouigari
    Moein Dehbashi
    Hossein Tabatabaeian
    Kamran Ghaedi
    Parisa Mohammadynejad
    Mansoureh Azadeh
    Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, 2019, 34 : 451 - 457