Board generational cohorts, gender diversity and corporate environmental and social disclosures: Evidence from China

被引:9
|
作者
Muniandy, Balachandran [1 ]
Ali, Muhammad Jahangir [1 ]
Huang, Haiyan [2 ]
Obeng, Victoria A. [3 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, Dept Accounting Data Analyt Econ & Finance, Bundoora, Australia
[2] VIP Mortgage Solut Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
[3] Australian Catholic Univ, Peter Faber Business Sch, Melbourne, Australia
关键词
REPORTING EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE; INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP; PERSONAL VALUES; GOVERNANCE; CSR; PERFORMANCE; WOMEN; COMMUNICATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2023.107066
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine the association between board generational cohorts and corporate environ-mental and social disclosure. We find that older board members have a positive association with corporate environmental and social disclosures. In contrast, the moderately younger and youngest board members limit corporate environmental and social disclosures. Our results are robust to potential endogeneity with the use of alternative model specifications, with the youngest board members accounting for a lower level of corporate environmental and social disclosures. Furthermore, we find that the presence of gender diversity on the board moderates the relationship between board generational cohorts and corporate envi-ronmental and social disclosures and reporting incentives are important to oldest and youngest board members in their push for environmental and social disclosures. Finally, additional analysis indicates that firms with governmental shareholding are associated with a higher level of corporate environmental and social disclosures as compared to firms without governmental shareholding when board members are moderately young.(c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Board gender diversity and corporate social responsbility
    Wasiu Abiodun, Sanyaolu
    Micheal Rotimi, Sanni
    Menslu, Sultanova
    Zhaxat, Kenzhin
    Tursynzada, Kuangaliyeva
    Biola Hammed, Adesina
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 10 (03):
  • [22] Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility
    Yuan Chang
    Kun-Tsung Wu
    Shu-Hui Lin
    Chia-Jung Lin
    International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 2024, 9 (1):
  • [23] Impact of Board Gender Diversity on Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility: Empirical Evidence from France
    Boukattaya, Sonia
    Omri, Abdelwahed
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [24] Board gender diversity and transparency of environmental, social and governance disclosure: Evidence from Malaysia
    Wasiuzzaman, Shaista
    Mohammad, Wan Masliza Wan
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2020, 41 (01) : 145 - 156
  • [25] Corporate social responsibility and corporate fraud in China: The perspective of moderating effect of board gender diversity
    Chu, Shaner
    Oldford, Erin
    Wang, Jun
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 88 : 1582 - 1601
  • [26] Board Diversity and Corporate Investment Decisions: Evidence from China
    Ali, Farman
    Ullah, Muhammad
    Ali, Syed Tauseef
    Yang, Zhen
    Ali, Imran
    SAGE OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [27] Corporate Board and Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance: Evidence from China
    Liao, Lin
    Lin, Teng
    Zhang, Yuyu
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 150 (01) : 211 - 225
  • [28] Corporate Board and Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance: Evidence from China
    Lin Liao
    Teng (Philip) Lin
    Yuyu Zhang
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 150 : 211 - 225
  • [29] Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures
    Tingbani, Ishmael
    Chithambo, Lyton
    Tauringana, Venancio
    Papanikolaou, Nikolaos
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (06) : 2194 - 2210
  • [30] Board Diversity and Corporate Social Disclosure: Evidence from Vietnam
    Trang Cam Hoang
    Indra Abeysekera
    Shiguang Ma
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 151 : 833 - 852