Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Nabizadeh, Fardin [1 ,2 ]
Ramezannezhad, Elham [3 ]
Kargar, Amirhosein [4 ]
Sharafi, Amir Mohammad [5 ]
Ghaderi, Ali [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci Educ & Res Network USERN, Neuroscience Res Grp NRG, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
[3] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Esfahan, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Imam Khomeini Hosp Complex IKHC, Tehran, Iran
[5] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Students Sci Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; Artificial intelligence; Diagnosis; Machine learning; NEURAL-NETWORK; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s10072-022-06460-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The expansion of the availability of advanced imaging methods needs more time, expertise, and resources which is in contrast to the primary goal of the imaging techniques. To overcome most of these difficulties, artificial intelligence (AI) can be used. A number of studies used AI models for multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis and reported diverse results. Therefore, we aim to perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis study on the role of AI in the diagnosis of MS. Methods We performed a systematic search using four databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE. Studies that applied deep learning or AI to the diagnosis of MS based on any modalities were considered eligible in our study. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and area under curve (AUC) were pooled with a random-effects model and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results After the screening, 41 articles with 5989 individuals met the inclusion criteria and were included in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Our analysis showed that the overall accuracy among studies was 94% (95%CI: 93%, 96%). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 92% (95%CI: 90%, 95%) and 93% (95%CI: 90%, 96%), respectively. Furthermore, our analysis showed 92% precision in MS diagnosis for AI studies (95%CI: 88%, 97%). Also, the overall pooled AUC was 93% (95%CI: 89%, 96%). Conclusion Overall, AI models can further improve our diagnostic practice in MS patients. Our results indicate that the use of AI can aid the clinicians in accurate diagnosis of MS and improve current diagnostic approaches as most of the parameters including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and AUC were considerably high, especially when using MRI data.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 517
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Artificial Intelligence in Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kuo, Rachel Y. L.
    Harrison, Conrad
    Curran, Terry-Ann
    Jones, Benjamin
    Freethy, Alexander
    Cussons, David
    Stewart, Max
    Collins, Gary S.
    Furniss, Dominic
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 304 (01) : 50 - 62
  • [22] Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zurek, Michal
    Jasak, Kamil
    Niemczyk, Kazimierz
    Rzepakowska, Anna
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (10)
  • [23] Diagnostic accuracy of endocytoscopy via artificial intelligence in colorectal lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Hangbin
    Yang, Xinyu
    Tao, Ye
    Zhang, Xinyi
    Huang, Xuan
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (12):
  • [24] Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for detecting gastrointestinal luminal pathologies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Parkash, Om
    Siddiqui, Asra Tus Saleha
    Jiwani, Uswa
    Rind, Fahad
    Padhani, Zahra Ali
    Rizvi, Arjumand
    Hoodbhoy, Zahra
    Das, Jai K.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [25] Systematic review and meta-analysis of performance of wearable artificial intelligence in detecting and predicting depression
    Alaa Abd-Alrazaq
    Rawan AlSaad
    Farag Shuweihdi
    Arfan Ahmed
    Sarah Aziz
    Javaid Sheikh
    npj Digital Medicine, 6
  • [26] Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hassan, Cesare
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Iannone, Andrea
    Maselli, Roberta
    Jovani, Manol
    Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Yu, Honggang
    Areia, Miguel
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    Sharma, Prateek
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Roesch, Thomas
    Wallace, Michael
    Repici, Alessandro
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (01) : 77 - +
  • [27] Performance of artificial intelligence on cervical vertebral maturation assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sadeghi, Termeh Sarrafan
    Ourang, Seyed AmirHossein
    Sohrabniya, Fatemeh
    Sadr, Soroush
    Shobeiri, Parnian
    Motamedian, Saeed Reza
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [28] Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for approximal caries on bitewing radiographs: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Carvalho, Bruna Katherine Guimaraes
    Nolden, Elias-Leon
    Wenning, Alexander Schulze
    Kiss-Dala, Szilvia
    Agocs, Gergely
    Roth, Ivett
    Keremi, Beata
    Geczi, Zoltan
    Hegyi, Peter
    Kivovics, Marton
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 151
  • [29] Systematic review and meta-analysis of performance of wearable artificial intelligence in detecting and predicting depression
    Abd-Alrazaq, Alaa
    AlSaad, Rawan
    Shuweihdi, Farag
    Ahmed, Arfan
    Aziz, Sarah
    Sheikh, Javaid
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2023, 6 (01)
  • [30] Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-assisted PET imaging for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jing
    Xue, Le
    Jiang, Jiehui
    Liu, Fengtao
    Wu, Ping
    Lu, Jiaying
    Zhang, Huiwei
    Bao, Weiqi
    Xu, Qian
    Ju, Zizhao
    Chen, Li
    Jiao, Fangyang
    Lin, Huamei
    Ge, Jingjie
    Zuo, Chuantao
    Tian, Mei
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 7 (01)