Effect of 3-Dimensional Imaging Device on Polyp and Adenoma Detection During Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:3
|
作者
Sun, Xiujing [1 ]
Zhang, Qian [1 ]
Wu, Shanshan [1 ]
Xu, Changqin [2 ]
Zhang, Yang [1 ]
Hao, Xiaowen [1 ]
Meng, Ying [1 ]
Jiao, Yue [1 ]
Li, Hongmei [1 ]
Zhu, Siying [1 ]
Zhou, Yanhua [1 ]
Liu, Kuiliang [1 ]
Xu, Hongwei [2 ]
Zhu, Shengtao [1 ]
Zhang, Shutian [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Key Lab Precancerous Lesion Digest Dis, Beijing Friendship Hosp,Dept Gastroenterol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Digest Dis,Beijing Digest Dis C, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong First Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Shandong Prov Hosp, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2023年 / 118卷 / 10期
关键词
three-dimensional imaging; adenoma; polyp; detection rate; colonoscopy;
D O I
10.14309/ajg.0000000000002396
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION:To evaluate the effect of 3-dimensional (3D) imaging device on polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy. METHODS:In a single-blind, randomized controlled trial, participants aged 18-70 years who underwent diagnostic or screening colonoscopy were consecutively enrolled between August 2019 and May 2022. Each participant was randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either 2-dimensional (2D-3D) colonoscopy or 3D-2D colonoscopy through computer-generated random numbers. Primary outcome included polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR), defined as the proportion of individuals with at least 1 polyp or adenoma detected during colonoscopy. The primary analysis was intention-to-treat. RESULTS:Of 1,196 participants recruited, 571 in 2D-3D group and 583 in 3D-2D group were finally included after excluding those who met the exclusion criteria. The PDR between 2D and 3D groups was separately 39.6% and 40.5% during phase 1 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-1.22, P = 0.801), whereas PDR was significantly higher in 3D group (27.7%) than that of 2D group (19.9%) during phase 2, with a 1.54-fold increase (1.17-2.02, P = 0.002). Similarly, the ADR during phase 1 between 2D (24.7%) and 3D (23.8%) groups was not significant (OR = 1.05, 0.80-1.37, P = 0.788), while ADR was significantly higher in 3D group (13.8%) than that of 2D group (9.9%) during phase 2, with a 1.45-fold increase (1.01-2.08, P = 0.041). Further subgroup analysis confirmed significantly higher PDR and ADR of 3D group during phase 2, particularly in midlevel and junior endoscopists. DISCUSSION:The 3D imaging device could improve overall PDR and ADR during colonoscopy, particularly in midlevel and junior endoscopists. Trial number: ChiCTR1900025000.
引用
收藏
页码:1812 / 1820
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFECT OF VIDEO MONITOR SIZE ON POLYP DETECTION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Jovani, Manol
    Campbell, Emily J.
    Hur, Chin
    Joshi, Amit D.
    Chan, Andrew T.
    Nishioka, Norman S.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB154 - AB154
  • [32] Is Adenoma Detection Any Different From Polyp Detection With Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Data
    Malik, Sheza
    Loganathan, Priyadarshini
    Jason, Gutman
    Mohan, Babu
    Kothari, Shivangi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (10S): : S186 - S186
  • [33] L-menthol improves adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a randomized trial
    Inoue, Ken
    Dohi, Osamu
    Gen, Yasuyuki
    Jo, Masayasu
    Mazaki, Takeshi
    Tokita, Kazuhiko
    Yoshida, Naohisa
    Okayama, Tetsuya
    Kamada, Kazuhiro
    Katada, Kazuhiro
    Uchiyama, Kazuhiko
    Ishikawa, Takeshi
    Handa, Osamu
    Takagi, Tomohisa
    Konishi, Hideyuki
    Wakabayashi, Naoki
    Yagi, Nobuaki
    Naito, Yuji
    Itoh, Yoshito
    ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 46 (03) : 196 - 202
  • [34] Impact of second forward-view examination on adenoma detection rate during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Shan, Keshu
    Lu, Hongpeng
    Zhang, Zhixin
    Xie, Jiarong
    Xu, Lu
    Wang, Weihong
    Hu, Chunjiu
    Xu, Lei
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [35] Impact of preprocedure simethicone on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a multicenter, endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Bai, Yu
    Fang, Jun
    Zhao, Sheng-Bing
    Wang, Dong
    Li, Yan-Qing
    Shi, Rui-Hua
    Sun, Zi-Qin
    Sun, Ming-Jun
    Ji, Feng
    Si, Jian-Min
    Li, Zhao-Shen
    ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 50 (02) : 128 - 136
  • [36] Impact of second forward-view examination on adenoma detection rate during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Keshu Shan
    Hongpeng Lu
    Zhixin Zhang
    Jiarong Xie
    Lu Xu
    Weihong Wang
    Chunjiu Hu
    Lei Xu
    BMC Gastroenterology, 21
  • [37] Higher Adenoma Detection Rates with Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy - A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial
    Floer, Martin
    Biecker, Erwin
    Fitzlaff, Ruediger
    Roeming, Hermann
    Ameis, Detlev
    Heinecke, Achim
    Kunsch, Steffen
    Ellenrieder, Volker
    Stroebel, Philipp
    Schepke, Michael
    Meister, Tobias
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12):
  • [38] Adenoma and polyp detection rates during insertion versus withdrawal phase of colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Khan, Shahab R.
    Bhogal, Neil
    Ramai, Daryl
    Bilal, Mohammad
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Shah, Aun R.
    Mashiana, Harmeet S.
    Jha, Lokesh K.
    Bhat, Ishfaq
    Singh, Shailender
    Adler, Douglas G.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (01) : 68 - +
  • [39] ENDORINGS ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY VERSUS STANDARD COLONOSCOPY FOR POLYP DETECTION: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Thayalasekaran, Sreedhari
    Bhattacharyya, Rupam
    Chedgy, Fergus
    Basford, Peter
    Alkandari, Asma
    Subramaniam, Sharmila
    Kandiah, Kesavan
    Thursby-Pelham, Fergus
    Ellis, Richard
    Coda, Sergio
    Goggin, Patrick
    Longcroft-Wheaton, Gaius
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    GUT, 2019, 68 : A56 - A56
  • [40] Total Underwater Colonoscopy versus Standard CO2 for Adenoma Detection: A Randomized Controlled Tandem Colonoscopy Trial
    Anderson, Joseph
    Kahi, Charles J.
    Garcia, Jonathan R.
    Sullivan, Andrew W.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 : S274 - S274