CO2-negative fuel production using low-CO2 electricity: Syngas from a combination of methane pyrolysis and dry reforming with techno-economic analysis

被引:19
|
作者
Zong, Zhiyuan [1 ]
Cai, Genpei [1 ]
Tabbara, Majd [1 ]
Upham, D. Chester [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Syngas production; Methane pyrolysis; Dry reforming; Molten catalysis; CO2 abatement cost; BUBBLE-COLUMN REACTOR; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; CARBON-DIOXIDE; MOLTEN METALS; STEAM; COST; GAS; CONVERSION; REDUCTION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116624
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This work investigates the use of CO2 as a feedstock through a thermochemical approach using low-carbon electricity, in which the CO2 reforming and methane pyrolysis reactions are combined in a single electrically heated reactor (PY/DMR). The process is enabled by a molten metal catalyst which was recently reported. Kinetic data are experimentally determined for a molten Ni-In alloy and are then used to generate a process model and a techno-economic analysis. The activation energy for methane pyrolysis and dry reforming over molten Ni-In are 187 and 99 kJ/mol respectively. This results in a 236 m(3) rate-limited bubble-column reactor producing 500 kta syngas. PY/DMR is compared with a dry-reforming-based technology that is combined with steam reforming (SMR/DMR), state-of-art autothermal reforming (ATR), and CO2 co-electrolysis using solid oxide electrochemical cells from both an economic and environmental standpoint. In our present-day base case, SMR/DMR is the most affordable if no decoking is required ($179.2/t), while the commercialized ATR ($193.7/t) is similar to PY/DMR ($222/t). CO2 co-electrolysis is the least affordable case ($393.2/t). A sensitivity analysis indicates that the cost of PY/DMR is the most economically competitive case when clean (carbon intensity <= 160 g/kWh) and affordable (<=(sic)2.9/kwh) electricity is used, the solid carbon is sold at over $377/t, or when abatement cost reaches $104/t-CO2eq. Both PY/DMR and co-electrolysis result in net-negative CO2 emission, after heating and fugitive emissions are accounted for. The overall carbon footprints are -0.329 kg and -1.06 kg of CO2eq/kg-syngas respectively. PY/DMR has the lowest levelized CO2 mitigation cost ($60/t).
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Techno-economic analysis of the production of synthetic fuels using CO 2 generated by the cement industry and green hydrogen
    Leon, David
    Amez, Isabel
    Castells, Blanca
    Ortega, Marcelo F.
    Bolonio, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 80 : 406 - 417
  • [32] Full carbon upcycling of landfill gas into methanol by integrating CO2 hydrogenation and methane reforming: Process development and techno-economic analysis
    Lee, Junyoung
    Kim, Sunghoon
    Kim, Yong Tae
    Kwak, Geunjae
    Kim, Jiyong
    Energy, 2021, 199
  • [33] Full carbon upcycling of landfill gas into methanol by integrating CO2 hydrogenation and methane reforming: Process development and techno-economic analysis
    Lee, Junyoung
    Kim, Sunghoon
    Kim, Yong Tae
    Kwak, Geunjae
    Kim, Jiyong
    ENERGY, 2020, 199
  • [34] A techno-economic assessment of pyrolysis processes for carbon capture, hydrogen and syngas production from variable methane sources: Comparison with steam reforming, water electrolysis, and coal gasification
    Celik, Ahmet
    Ben Othman, Iadh
    Neudeck, Yannik
    Deutschmann, Olaf
    Lott, Patrick
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 326
  • [35] Techno-economic analysis of integrated hydrogen and methanol production process by CO2 hydrogenation
    Yousaf, Muhammad
    Mahmood, Asif
    Elkamel, Ali
    Rizwan, Muhammad
    Zaman, Muhammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2022, 115
  • [36] Methanol production from CO2 using solar-thermal energy: process development and techno-economic analysis
    Kim, Jiyong
    Henao, Carlos A.
    Johnson, Terry A.
    Dedrick, Daniel E.
    Miller, James E.
    Stechel, Ellen B.
    Maravelias, Christos T.
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2011, 4 (09) : 3122 - 3132
  • [37] CO2 Utilization Technologies: A Techno-Economic Analysis for Synthetic Natural Gas Production
    Szima, Szabolcs
    Cormos, Calin-Cristian
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (05)
  • [38] TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF INTEGRATED GASIFICATION FUEL CELL POWER PLANTS CAPTURING CO2
    Lanzini, Andrea
    Kreutz, Thomas G.
    Martelli, Emanuele
    Santarelli, Massimo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO 2012, VOL 3, 2012, : 337 - +
  • [39] Techno-Economic Analysis of Coal-Based Hydrogen and Electricity Cogeneration Processes with CO2 Capture
    Li, Fanxing
    Zeng, Liang
    Fan, Liang-Shih
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2010, 49 (21) : 11018 - 11028
  • [40] Techno-economic assessment of atmospheric CO2-based carbon fibre production enabling negative emissions
    Dominik Keiner
    Andreas Mühlbauer
    Gabriel Lopez
    Tuomas Koiranen
    Christian Breyer
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2023, 28