Validity assessment of the POLARS score tool in the prediction of post rectal cancer surgery LARS score in a population-based Swedish cohort

被引:3
|
作者
Rethy, Boglarka [1 ]
Nordenvall, Caroline [1 ]
Pieniowski, Emil [2 ]
Jansson-Palmer, Gabriella [1 ]
Johar, Asif [1 ]
Lagergren, Pernilla [1 ]
Abraham-Nordling, Mirna [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, South Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
BMJ OPEN GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2024年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
ANORECTAL DISORDERS; ANORECTAL FUNCTION; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; COLORECTAL CANCER; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; ANTERIOR RESECTION SYNDROME; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FOLLOW-UP; MULTICENTER; RADIOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001274
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveLow anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is one of the most common functional impairments after rectal cancer surgery with a high impact on quality of life. The Pre-Operative LARS score (POLARS) nomogram and its online tool has been developed to predict the degree of postoperative LARS. The aim of this study was to analyse how accurately the POLARS score could predict LARS scores when compared with actual patient-reported LARS (PR-LARS) scores in a population-based Swedish cohort.DesignThis retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent curative rectal cancer surgery between 2007 and 2013 in Stockholm County and were identified using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR). Information regarding preoperative risk factors, patient and treatment characteristics, and presence of LARS postoperatively were collected from patient charts, SCRCR and patient questionnaires. The POLARS model formula was used to predict LARS scores, which then were compared with the actual PR-LARS scores. Individual LARS score differences between the two estimates were shown with a modified Bland-Altman plot of difference.ResultsThe cohort included 477 patients, of whom 359 (75%) of patients were categorised as having no/minor LARS based on the POLARS score. The correctly identified patients by the POLARS score were 80/255 (31%) in the major LARS group and 184/222 (83%) no/minor LARS group. The sensitivity was 31% for major LARS and the positive predictive value was 68%.ConclusionThe POLARS score has a low sensitivity for major LARS in this Swedish cohort. Other methods to predict the risk of LARS need to be developed.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Lifestyle risk score and mortality in Korean adults: a population-based cohort study
    Lee, Dong Hoon
    Nam, Jin Young
    Kwon, Sohyeon
    Keum, NaNa
    Lee, Jong-Tae
    Shin, Min-Jeong
    Oh, Hannah
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [42] 'French LARS score': validation of the French version of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score for measuring bowel dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery among rectal cancer patients: a study protocol
    Eid, Yassine
    Bouvier, Veronique
    Dejardin, Olivier
    Menahem, Benjamin
    Chaillot, Fabien
    Chene, Yannick
    Dutheil, Jean Jacques
    Juul, Therese
    Morello, Remy
    Alves, Arnaud
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [43] Incidence and risk factors of bowel dysfunction after minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery and discrepancies between the Wexner score and the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score
    Ota, Emi
    Nagasaki, Toshiya
    Akiyoshi, Takashi
    Mukai, Toshiki
    Hiyoshi, Yukiharu
    Yamaguchi, Tomohiro
    Fukunaga, Yosuke
    SURGERY TODAY, 2024, 54 (07) : 763 - 770
  • [44] Surgery during holiday periods and prognosis in oesophageal cancer: a population-based nationwide Swedish cohort study
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Wahlin, Karl
    Mattsson, Fredrik
    Lagergren, Pernilla
    Lagergren, Jesper
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (09):
  • [45] Acute lung injury prediction score: derivation and validation in a population-based sample
    Trillo-Alvarez, C.
    Cartin-Ceba, R.
    Kor, D. J.
    Kojicic, M.
    Kashyap, R.
    Thakur, S.
    Thakur, L.
    Herasevich, V.
    Malinchoc, M.
    Gajic, O.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2011, 37 (03) : 604 - 609
  • [46] Cancer risk in individuals with polydactyly: a Swedish population-based cohort study
    Wachtmeister, Alexandra
    Tettamanti, Giorgio
    Nordgren, Ida
    Norrby, Christina
    Laurell, Tobias
    Lu, Yunxia
    Nordenvall, Anna Skarin
    Nordgren, Ann
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 131 (04) : 755 - 762
  • [47] Survival outcomes for right-versus left-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer in England: A propensity-score matched population-based cohort study
    Hodges, Nicola
    Mackenzie, Hugh
    D'Souza, Nigel
    Brown, Gina
    Miskovic, Danilo
    EJSO, 2022, 48 (04): : 841 - 849
  • [48] Risk factors of rectal cancer local recurrence: population-based survey and validation of the Swedish rectal cancer registry
    Jorgren, F.
    Johansson, R.
    Damber, L.
    Lindmark, G.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (10) : 977 - 986
  • [49] Predictive Value of CEA for Survival in Stage I Rectal Cancer: a Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Ignazio Tarantino
    Rene Warschkow
    Bruno M. Schmied
    Ulrich Güller
    Markus Mieth
    Thomas Cerny
    Markus W. Büchler
    Alexis Ulrich
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2016, 20 : 1213 - 1222
  • [50] Prognostic Relevance of Mucinous Subtype in a Population-based Propensity Score Analysis of 40,083 Rectal Cancer Patients
    Ignazio Tarantino
    Felix J. Hüttner
    Rene Warschkow
    Bruno M. Schmied
    Markus K. Diener
    Alexis Ulrich
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2016, 23 : 1576 - 1586