In science we trust? Public trust in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projections and accepting anthropogenic climate change

被引:8
|
作者
Tranter, Bruce [1 ,3 ]
Lester, Libby [1 ]
Foxwell-Norton, Kerrie [2 ]
Palmer, Matthew A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Brisbane, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
Australia; climate change; IPCC; trust in science; UNITED-STATES; MEDIA; POLITICIZATION; COMMUNICATION; POLARIZATION; UNCERTAINTY; INFORMATION; SKEPTICISM; MITIGATION; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1177/09636625231165405
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
One barrier to action on climate change is public trust in climate science, and projections made by climate scientists. However, climate science projections are rarely measured in public surveys. We designed survey questions based on two Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projections regarding global warming and coral reef decline. We gauge Australians' trust in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projections, and explore how trust in climate science is associated with accepting anthropogenic climate change. A slim majority of Australian adults trust Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projections, with trust correlated positively with accepting anthropogenic climate change. While partisan divisions are extant in accepting anthropogenic climate change, partisan influences are attenuated substantially after controlling for trust in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projections, as trust in climate science mediates the influence of partisanship on the acceptance of anthropogenic climate change. A minority of those who accept anthropogenic climate change have low trust in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projections, viewing scientists' computer models as unreliable, or believing climate scientists benefit from overstating the impact of climate change.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 708
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Public trust in science: Climate, energy and public health
    Y. Shirley Meng
    MRS Energy & Sustainability, 2021, 8 : 41 - 41
  • [42] Public trust in science: Climate, energy and public health
    Meng, Y. Shirley
    MRS ENERGY & SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 8 (02) : 41 - 41
  • [43] Boom or Bust: The Public Trust Doctrine in Canadian Climate Change Litigation
    Ahmad, Hassan M.
    QUEENS LAW JOURNAL, 2024, 49 (02)
  • [44] Science for implementation: the roles, experiences, and perceptions of practitioners involved in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
    M. A. North
    N. B. Hunter
    D. C. Roberts
    R. Slotow
    Climate Action, 1 (1):
  • [45] Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) "reasons for concern''
    Smith, Joel B.
    Schneider, Stephen H.
    Oppenheimer, Michael
    Yohe, Gary W.
    Hare, William
    Mastrandrea, Michael D.
    Patwardhan, Anand
    Burton, Ian
    Corfee-Morlot, Jan
    Magadza, Chris H. D.
    Fuessel, Hans-Martin
    Pittock, A. Barrie
    Rahman, Atiq
    Suarez, Avelino
    van Ypersele, Jean-Pascal
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (11) : 4133 - 4137
  • [46] Indices for extreme events in projections of anthropogenic climate change
    J. Sillmann
    E. Roeckner
    Climatic Change, 2008, 86 : 83 - 104
  • [47] Patterns of belief and trust in climate change information
    Johnson, Victoria
    Butterfuss, Reese
    Harsch, Rina
    Kendeou, Panayiota
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2025, 62 (03) : 655 - 683
  • [48] CLIMATE CHANGE, EPISTEMIC TRUST, AND EXPERT TRUSTWORTHINES
    Ben Almassi
    ETHICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 17 (02) : 29 - 49
  • [49] Indices for extreme events in projections of anthropogenic climate change
    Sillmann, J.
    Roeckner, E.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2008, 86 (1-2) : 83 - 104
  • [50] Prolepsis and Rendering Futures in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Reports
    Mehlenbacher, Ashley Rose
    Doody, Sara
    Eckert, Carolyn
    Mehlenbacher, Brad
    WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, 2024, 41 (02) : 352 - 377