Evaluation of Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Changes in Patients With Class II Div 1 Malocclusion Treated With Twin Block Appliance

被引:1
|
作者
Gandhi, Vaibhav [1 ]
Mehta, Falguni [2 ]
Patel, Dolly [3 ]
Joshi, Hrishabh [4 ]
Tadinada, Aditya [5 ]
Yadav, Sumit [6 ]
Malek, Farheen [7 ]
机构
[1] Candian Orthodont Partners, Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthopaed, Red Deer, AB, Canada
[2] Govt Dent Coll & Hosp, Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthopaed, Ahmadabad, India
[3] AMC Ahmedabad Municipal Corp Dent Coll & Hosp, Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthopaed, Ahmadabad, India
[4] Univ Alberta, Dent, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Connecticut, Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Farmington, CT USA
[6] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Growth & Dev, Lincoln, NE USA
[7] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Dent, Prosthodont, New Orleans, LA USA
关键词
growth modulation; functional therapy; twin block appliance; mandibular retrognathia; class ii malocclusion; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; CLINICAL-TRIAL; BIONATOR; HARD;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.49364
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective The study was focused on evaluating the change in mandibular morphology following the Twin Block appliance therapy and recording its effect on the maxilla and maxillary dentoalveolar complex. Also, the results of the Twin Block appliance between males and females were compared. Material and methods In this two-armed retrospective cephalometric study, 30 patients (mean age 12 years) treated with Twin Block appliance for the period of 8-12 months were chosen, and their records were obtained to analyze. These results were compared with 15 control subjects of the same age group chosen from the American Association of Orthodontics Foundation (AAOF) growth legacy collection: Michigan Growth Study Class II subjects. Cephalometric tracing was done, and data was processed for descriptive statistical analysis. Results Paired sample t-test and ANOVA test were performed to evaluate the differences in the pre-treatment (T1) and post-functional (T2) values. angle ANB showed a mean difference of-4.71 degrees +/- 1.55 degrees for males and 6.22 degrees +/- 6.78 degrees for females, which is significant. The mandibular length (Co-Gn), for male subjects, the mean difference was 5.14 +/- 1.74 mm, and for female subjects, it was 6 +/- 2mm, which is highly significant; 49.88% of skeletal changes and 50.12% of dentoalveolar changes were reported to bring about Class II correction with Twin Block. Conclusion A successful increase in mandibular length was achieved using a Twin Block as a functional appliance. Also, the significant maxillary restraining effect was recorded. More skeletal changes were observed in males than females.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of the efficacy of twin block appliance compared with other functional appliances in class II malocclusion patients: A systematic review
    Rahimi, Farshad
    Sadeghi, Masoud
    Mozaffari, Hamid Reza
    MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 22 (90) : 188 - 202
  • [32] Two-phase treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion with the combination of the Twin-block appliance and high-pull headgear
    Lv, Yan
    Yan, Bin
    Wang, Lin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 142 (02) : 246 - 255
  • [33] An asymmetric magnetic reverse Twin-block appliance for the treatment of a skeletal Class III malocclusion: a case report
    Ma, Qiaoling
    Mei, Li
    Jiang, Yuanyuan
    Xu, Yun
    Wu, Tuojiang
    Li, Huang
    AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC JOURNAL, 2019, 35 (02): : 229 - 240
  • [34] Discomfort, Expectations and Experiences during Treatment of Class II Malocclusion with Clear Block and Twin Block Appliance - A Pilot Survey
    Gurudatta, Navjeet Singh
    Kamble, Ranjit H.
    Sangtani, Jimmy K.
    John, Zynul A.
    Ahuja, Monika M.
    Khakhar, Prutha G.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2021, 10 (15): : 1064 - 1068
  • [35] Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Profile Changes with Herbst and Twin Block Appliances in Class II Malocclusion Patients: A Perception Study
    Kannan, Annapurna
    Padmanabhan, Sridevi
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 35 (03) : 173 - 179
  • [36] Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects
    Mariani L.
    Maino G.
    Caprioglio A.
    Progress in Orthodontics, 15 (1)
  • [37] Effects of twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in class II malocclusion subjects
    Ghodke S.
    Utreja A.K.
    Singh S.P.
    Jena A.K.
    Progress in Orthodontics, 15 (1) : 2 - 8
  • [38] Treatment Effects of Twin-Block and Mandibular Protraction Appliance-IV in the Correction of Class II Malocclusion
    Jena, Ashok Kumar
    Duggal, Ritu
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2010, 80 (03) : 485 - 491
  • [39] Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Effects Induced by the Paolone-Kaitsas Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Malocclusion: A Controlled Retrospective Study on Lateral Cephalograms
    Gavazzi, Camilla
    Franceschi, Debora
    Pierleoni, Felicita
    Barone, Valeria
    Kaitsas, Francesco
    Paolone, Maria Giacinta
    Franchi, Lorenzo
    Giuntini, Veronica
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [40] Effects of Twin-block vs sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance on alveolar bone around mandibular incisors in growing patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion
    Zhang, Chun-xi
    Shen, Gang
    Ning, Yu-jun
    Liu, Hong
    Zhao, Yi
    Liu, Dong-xu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 157 (03) : 329 - 339