Evaluation of Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Changes in Patients With Class II Div 1 Malocclusion Treated With Twin Block Appliance

被引:1
|
作者
Gandhi, Vaibhav [1 ]
Mehta, Falguni [2 ]
Patel, Dolly [3 ]
Joshi, Hrishabh [4 ]
Tadinada, Aditya [5 ]
Yadav, Sumit [6 ]
Malek, Farheen [7 ]
机构
[1] Candian Orthodont Partners, Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthopaed, Red Deer, AB, Canada
[2] Govt Dent Coll & Hosp, Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthopaed, Ahmadabad, India
[3] AMC Ahmedabad Municipal Corp Dent Coll & Hosp, Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthopaed, Ahmadabad, India
[4] Univ Alberta, Dent, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Connecticut, Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Farmington, CT USA
[6] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Growth & Dev, Lincoln, NE USA
[7] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Dent, Prosthodont, New Orleans, LA USA
关键词
growth modulation; functional therapy; twin block appliance; mandibular retrognathia; class ii malocclusion; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; CLINICAL-TRIAL; BIONATOR; HARD;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.49364
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective The study was focused on evaluating the change in mandibular morphology following the Twin Block appliance therapy and recording its effect on the maxilla and maxillary dentoalveolar complex. Also, the results of the Twin Block appliance between males and females were compared. Material and methods In this two-armed retrospective cephalometric study, 30 patients (mean age 12 years) treated with Twin Block appliance for the period of 8-12 months were chosen, and their records were obtained to analyze. These results were compared with 15 control subjects of the same age group chosen from the American Association of Orthodontics Foundation (AAOF) growth legacy collection: Michigan Growth Study Class II subjects. Cephalometric tracing was done, and data was processed for descriptive statistical analysis. Results Paired sample t-test and ANOVA test were performed to evaluate the differences in the pre-treatment (T1) and post-functional (T2) values. angle ANB showed a mean difference of-4.71 degrees +/- 1.55 degrees for males and 6.22 degrees +/- 6.78 degrees for females, which is significant. The mandibular length (Co-Gn), for male subjects, the mean difference was 5.14 +/- 1.74 mm, and for female subjects, it was 6 +/- 2mm, which is highly significant; 49.88% of skeletal changes and 50.12% of dentoalveolar changes were reported to bring about Class II correction with Twin Block. Conclusion A successful increase in mandibular length was achieved using a Twin Block as a functional appliance. Also, the significant maxillary restraining effect was recorded. More skeletal changes were observed in males than females.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the twin block appliance in class II division 1 malocclusion patients
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    Major, Paul W.
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2006, 76 (05) : 876 - 881
  • [2] Cephalometric Comparison of Treatment with Twin Block Appliance in Skeletal Class II Div 1 Patients with Normal and Vertical Growth Pattern
    Mollabashi, Vahid
    Nezhad, Maryam Behtari
    Shahdoost, Maryam
    Yousefi, Faezeh
    Saadat, Kimia
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCE, 2018, 6 (02): : 506 - 513
  • [3] Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: A comparative study
    Jena, Ashok Kumar
    Duggal, Ritu
    Parkash, Hari
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2006, 130 (05) : 594 - 602
  • [4] Changes in Upper Airway Dimensions Following Orthodontic Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Twin Block Appliance: A Systematic Review
    Mohamed, Roshan Noor
    Basha, Sakeenabi
    Al-Thomali, Yousef
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2020, 33 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [5] Three-dimensional skeletal and dentoalveolar sagittal and vertical changes associated with cantilever Herbst appliance in prepubertal patients with Class II malocclusion
    Sangalli, Kamilla Leonardo
    Dutra-Horstmann, Kamile Leonardi
    Correr, Gisele Maria
    Topolski, Francielle
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    Lagravere, Manuel O.
    Moro, Alexandre
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2022, 161 (05) : 638 - +
  • [6] Evaluation of changes in the upper airway after Twin Block treatment in patients with Class II malocclusion
    Entrenas, Inmaculada
    Gonzalez-Chamorro, Elena
    Alvarez-Abad, Covadonga
    Muriel, Juan
    Menendez-Diaz, Ivan
    Cobo, Teresa
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 5 (03): : 259 - 268
  • [7] Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion
    Jamilian, Abdolreza
    Showkatbakhsh, Rahman
    Amiri, Shabnam Sheikholeslam
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2011, 33 (04) : 354 - 358
  • [8] Bimaxillary morphometry of patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with Twin Block appliances
    Singh, GD
    Hodge, MR
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2002, 72 (05) : 402 - 409
  • [9] Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on Class II division 1 malocclusion
    Barnett, Gregory A.
    Higgins, Duncan W.
    Major, Paul W.
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2008, 78 (02) : 361 - 369
  • [10] The skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of activator-headgear combined appliance in Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Marsan, G
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A301 - A301