Stakeholders' design preferences for instructional gamification

被引:3
|
作者
Palmquist, Adam [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Appl Informat Technol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Nord Univ, Fac Social Sci, Levanger, Norway
关键词
Content-structural gamification; hedonic and utilitarian dimensions; information technology design; workplace learning stakeholders; mixed method; factor analysis; SYSTEMS PROJECT ABANDONMENT; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; USER ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY; MOTIVATION; SCIENCE; SCALE; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1080/0144929X.2023.2255905
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
There is increasing interest in incorporating game design elements in workplace learning, known as instructional gamification. Despite initial positive indications, there is still a need for a deeper understanding of how organisational stakeholders play a role in implementing instructional gamification. This study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach to identify and understand stakeholders' instructional gamification design preferences and how these preferences might impact their endorsement of instructional gamification. A survey of 231 individuals at a software company was conducted to gather data on stakeholders' preferences for instructional gamification. This was followed by in-depth interviews with eight employees to further enhance the understanding of stakeholders' instructional gamification design preferences. The quantitative findings revealed four interrelated factors concerning the instructional gamification design preferences of the three stakeholder groups. However, the qualitative findings revealed that the stakeholder groups interpreted the items differently. By integrating the quantitative and qualitative findings, the study provides a comprehensive understanding of the factors that enable or hinder stakeholders' endorsement of instructional gamification in workplace learning. The study also presents four design propositions that facilitate stakeholder endorsement of gamified learning artifacts. The findings have both theoretical and practical implications for designing and implementing instructional gamification in workplace learning environments.
引用
收藏
页码:2717 / 2749
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Design Templates in Instructional Design
    Walwema, Josephine
    SIGDOC '12: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 30TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DESIGN OF COMMUNICATION, 2012, : 17 - 22
  • [32] A History of Instructional Media, Instructional Design, and Theories
    An, Yunjo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2021, 4 (01): : 1 - 21
  • [33] Description of a Gamification Design Framework
    Jesus Antonio, Alvarez-Cedillo
    Patricia, Perez-Romero
    Teodoro, Alvarez-Sanchez
    2018 IEEE BIENNIAL CONGRESS OF ARGENTINA (ARGENCON), 2018,
  • [34] Integrate Gamification into Questionnaire Design
    Chen, Yu-Chen
    Chen, Chin-Ying
    Chen, Hsi-Jen
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, HCI 2023, PT I, 2023, 14011 : 18 - 29
  • [35] A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design
    Robert A. Reiser
    Educational Technology Research and Development, 2001, 49 : 57 - 67
  • [36] FROM BEHAVIORISM INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN TO INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN IN THE COMPLEXITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION
    Duran Gonzalez, Rosa Elena
    Raesfeld, Lydia
    Medecigo Shej, Amira
    REVISTA INCLUSIONES, 2019, 6 (01): : 120 - 130
  • [37] A history of instructional design and technology; Part II: A history of instructional design
    Reiser, RA
    ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 49 (02): : 57 - 67
  • [38] College Students' Preferences on Principles for the Effective Instructional Video Design for Online General English Classes in Korea
    Seo, Ji-Young
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF E-LEARNING, 2022, 20 (03): : 313 - 324
  • [39] A Gamification Design Tool to Improve Design Quality
    Grimm, Valentin
    MUC 2022: PROCEEDINGS OF MENSCH UND COMPUTER 2022, 2022, : 605 - 607
  • [40] GARUSO: a gamification approach for involving stakeholders outside organizational reach in requirements engineering
    Martina Z. Kolpondinos
    Martin Glinz
    Requirements Engineering, 2020, 25 : 185 - 212