Patient Preferences for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatments: A Discrete-Choice Experiment

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Daneng [1 ]
Tan, Ruoding [2 ]
Hernandez, Sairy [2 ]
Reilly, Norelle [2 ]
Bussberg, Cooper [3 ]
Mansfield, Carol [3 ]
机构
[1] City Hope Comprehens Canc Ctr, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
[2] Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
[3] RTI Hlth Solut, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
关键词
discrete choice; stated preferences; survival; health-related quality of life; ATEZOLIZUMAB PLUS BEVACIZUMAB; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; REPORTED OUTCOMES; NON-INFERIORITY; OPEN-LABEL; PHASE-III; SORAFENIB; LENVATINIB;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15051470
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Several treatments are available for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and it is important to understand patients' treatment priorities and goals regarding such treatment options. In a survey study, we explored 200 patients' preferences for six different features of HCC treatments: months of additional survival, months of maintained daily function, severity of hand-foot syndrome, severity of high blood pressure, risk of bleeding in the digestive tract, and how the medicine is taken. Of the features included in the survey, it was most important to respondents to avoid moderate-to-severe hand-foot syndrome and moderate-to-severe high blood pressure. Respondents considered 10 additional months of maintaining daily functioning to be as important or more important than 10 additional months of survival. For some patients with HCC, maintaining quality of life and avoiding moderate-to-severe side effects may be as important or more important than a medicine's survival benefit. Treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have varying benefit-risk profiles. We elicited 200 US patients' preferences for attributes associated with various first-line systemic treatments for unresectable HCC in a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) survey. Respondents answered nine DCE questions, each offering a choice between two hypothetical treatment profiles defined by six attributes with varying levels: overall survival (OS), months of maintained daily function, severity of palmar-plantar syndrome, severity of hypertension, risk of digestive-tract bleeding, and mode and frequency of administration. A random-parameters logit model was used to analyze the preference data. Patients regarded an additional 10 months of maintaining daily function without decline to be as important or more important than 10 additional months of OS, on average. Respondents valued avoiding moderate-to-severe palmar-plantar syndrome and hypertension more than extended OS. A respondent would require >10 additional months of OS (the greatest increase presented in the study) on average to offset the increased burden of adverse events. Patients with unresectable HCC prioritize avoiding adverse events that would severely impact their quality of life over mode and frequency of administration or digestive-tract bleeding risk. For some patients with unresectable HCC, maintaining daily functioning is as important or more important than the survival benefit of a treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient preferences for pilonidal sinus treatments: A discrete choice experiment survey
    Wickramasekera, Nyantara
    Strong, Emily
    Shackley, Philip
    Callaghan, Tia
    Lee, Matthew
    Hind, Daniel
    Brown, Steven
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 25 (05) : 984 - 994
  • [42] A DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENT TO ASSESS EXPERTS' PREFERENCES FOR SARCOPENIA OUTCOMES
    Beaudart, C.
    Bauer, J.
    Landi, F.
    Bruyere, O.
    Reginster, J-Y
    Hiligsmann, M.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 31 (SUPPL 1) : S320 - S320
  • [43] PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS TREATMENTS: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Collacott, H.
    Phillips-Beyer, A.
    Krucien, N.
    Marsh, K.
    Flamion, B.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2022, 81 : 264 - 264
  • [44] Patient preferences for stress urinary incontinence treatments: a discrete choice experiment
    Boyers, Dwayne
    Kilonzo, Mary
    Davidson, Tracey
    Cooper, David
    Wardle, Judith
    Bhal, Kiron
    N'Dow, James
    Maclennan, Graeme
    Norrie, John
    Abdel-Fattah, Mohamed
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (08):
  • [45] Patient and Caregiver Preferences for Hemophilia Prophylactic Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Lu, Hui
    Whitty, Jenny
    Gould, Travis
    Colavecchia, Carmine
    Coulter, Josh
    Dunn, Nicola
    Chowdary, Pratima
    Wilcox, Lisa J.
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    Christopher, Stephanie A.
    Sohn, Alexis
    Hauber, Brett
    BLOOD, 2024, 144 : 2591 - 2592
  • [46] Patients’ preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment
    Mickaël Hiligsmann
    Benedict G Dellaert
    Carmen D Dirksen
    Trudy van der Weijden
    Stefan Goemaere
    Jean-Yves Reginster
    Verity Watson
    Annelies Boonen
    Arthritis Research & Therapy, 16
  • [47] Chronic pain patients’ treatment preferences: a discrete-choice experiment
    Axel C. Mühlbacher
    Uwe Junker
    Christin Juhnke
    Edgar Stemmler
    Thomas Kohlmann
    Friedhelm Leverkus
    Matthias Nübling
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2015, 16 : 613 - 628
  • [48] Patients' preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment
    Hiligsmann, Mickael
    Dellaert, Benedict G.
    Dirksen, Carmen D.
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Goemaere, Stefan
    Reginster, Jean-Yves
    Watson, Verity
    Boonen, Annelies
    ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2014, 16 (01)
  • [49] Preferences for active surveillance or standard oesophagectomy: discrete-choice experiment
    Van der Wilk, Berend J.
    Spronk, Inge
    Noordman, Bo J.
    Eyck, Ben M.
    Haagsma, Juanita A.
    Coene, Peter-Paul L. O.
    Van der Harst, Erwin
    Heisterkamp, Joos
    Lagarde, Sjoerd M.
    Wijnhoven, Bas P. L.
    van Lanschot, J. Jan B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109 (02) : 169 - 171
  • [50] Chronic pain patients' treatment preferences: a discrete-choice experiment
    Muehlbacher, Axel C.
    Junker, Uwe
    Juhnke, Christin
    Stemmler, Edgar
    Kohlmann, Thomas
    Leverkus, Friedhelm
    Nuebling, Matthias
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2015, 16 (06): : 613 - 628