Trend and early outcomes in isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in the United Kingdom

被引:6
|
作者
Chan, Jeremy [1 ]
Dimagli, Arnaldo [1 ]
Fudulu, Daniel P. P. [1 ]
Sinha, Shubhra [1 ]
Narayan, Pradeep [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Tim [1 ]
Angelini, Gianni D. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Heart Inst, Bristol, England
[2] NH Rabindranath Tagore Int Inst Cardiac Sci, Kolkata, India
来源
关键词
aortic valve; trend; surgical aortic replacement; transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement; United Kingdom; TRANSCATHETER; SURGERY; REGISTRY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2022.1077279
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveSurgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is traditionally the gold-standard treatment in patients with aortic valve disease. The advancement of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) provides an alternative treatment to patients with high surgical risks and those who had previous cardiac surgery. We aim to evaluate the trend, early clinical outcomes, and the choice of prosthesis use in isolated SAVR in the United Kingdom. MethodsAll patients (n = 79,173) who underwent elective or urgent isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) from 1996 to 2018 were extracted from the National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit database. Patients who underwent additional procedures and emergency or salvage SAVR were excluded from the study. Trend and clinical outcomes were investigated in the whole cohort. Patients who had previous cardiac surgery, high-risk groups (EuroSCORE II >4%), and predicted/observed mortality were evaluated. Furthermore, the use of biological prostheses in five different age groups, that are <50, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and >80, was investigated. Clinical outcomes between the use of mechanical and biological aortic valve prostheses in patients ResultsThe number of isolated SAVR increased across the study period with an average of 4,661 cases performed annually after 2010. The in-hospital/30-day mortality rate decreased from 5.28% (1996) to 1.06% (2018), despite an increasing trend in EuroSCORE II. The number of isolated SAVR performed in octogenarians increased from 596 to 2007 (the first year when TAVR was introduced in the UK) to 872 in 2015 and then progressively decreased to 681 in 2018. Biological prosthesis usage increased across all age groups, particularly in the 60-69 group, from 24.59% (1996) to 81.87% (2018). There were no differences in short-term outcomes in patients ConclusionSurgical aortic valve replacement remains an effective treatment for patients with isolated aortic valve disease with a low in-hospital/30-day mortality rate. The number of patients with high-risk and octogenarians who underwent isolated SAVR and those requiring redo surgery has reduced since 2016, likely due to the advancement in TAVR. The use of biological aortic prostheses has increased significantly in recent years in all age groups.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk Factors and Outcomes of Reoperative Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the United Kingdom
    Narayan, Pradeep
    Dimagli, Arnaldo
    Fudulu, Daniel P.
    Sinha, Shubhra
    Dong, Tim
    Chan, Jeremy
    Angelini, Gianni D.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 116 (04): : 759 - 766
  • [2] Outcomes of isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in the era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Ram, Eilon
    Amunts, Sergei
    Zuroff, Elchanan
    Peled, Yael
    Kogan, Alexander
    Raanani, Ehud
    Sternik, Leonid
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (07) : 1452 - 1457
  • [3] Trend in mitral valve prostheses of choice and early outcomes in the United Kingdom
    Chan, Jeremy
    Narayan, Pradeep
    Fudulu, Daniel P.
    Dong, Tim
    Angelini, Gianni D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 397
  • [4] Early outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement with rapid deployment aortic valve
    Wahlers, Thorsten C. W.
    Haverich, Axel
    Borger, Michael A.
    Shrestha, Malakh
    Kocher, Alfred A.
    Walther, Thomas
    Roth, Matthias
    Misfeld, Martin
    Mohr, Friedrich W.
    Kempfert, Joerg
    Dohmen, Pascal M.
    Schmitz, Christoph
    Rahmanian, Parwis
    Wiedemann, Dominik
    Duhay, Francis G.
    Laufer, Guenther
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 151 (06): : 1639 - 1647
  • [5] Trends in Isolated Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Strassle, Paula D.
    Arora, Sameer
    Vavalle, John P.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (01) : 107 - 108
  • [6] Valve-in-Valve TAVR versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Early Outcomes
    Cizmic, Amila
    Kuhn, Elmar
    Eghbalzadeh, Kaveh
    Weber, Carolyn
    Rahmanian, Parwis Baradaran
    Adam, Matti
    Mauri, Victor
    Rudolph, Tanja
    Baldus, Stephan
    Wahlers, Thorsten
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2023, 71 (02): : 94 - 100
  • [7] Trends in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in the Post Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Chahine, Johnny
    Fiocchi, Jacob
    John, Ranjit
    Shaffer, Andrew
    Knoper, Ryan C.
    Yannopoulos, Demetris
    Raveendran, Ganesh
    Gurevich, Sergey
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [8] Early surgical outcomes of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valves
    Lee, June
    Kim, Yong Han
    Lim, Hyun Ali
    Hong, Seok Beom
    Kim, Do Yeon
    Kim, Hwan Wook
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [9] Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement for mixed aortic valve disease
    Philip, Jennifer L.
    Zens, Tiffany
    Lozonschi, Lucian
    De Oliveira, Nilto C.
    Osaki, Satoru
    Kohmoto, Takushi
    Akhter, Shahab A.
    Tang, Paul C.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 (07) : 4042 - 4051
  • [10] Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus isolated redo surgical aortic valve replacement
    Yousef, Sarah
    Serna-Gallegos, Derek
    Iyanna, Nidhi
    Kliner, Dustin
    Brown, James A.
    Toma, Catalin
    Makani, Amber
    West, David
    Wang, Yisi
    Thoma, Floyd W.
    Ahmad, Danial
    Yoon, Pyongsoo
    Chu, Danny
    Kaczorowski, David
    Bonatti, Johannes
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 168 (04): : 1003 - 1010