Emotion beliefs: conceptual review and compendium

被引:6
|
作者
Kisley, Michael A. [1 ]
Shulkin, Josh [1 ]
Meza-Whitlatch, Margarita V. [1 ]
Pedler, Rhea B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Colorado Springs, Dept Psychol, Colorado Springs, CO 80918 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
emotion belief; implicit theories; lay theories; emotion mindset; layperson beliefs; IMPLICIT THEORIES; META-EMOTION; CHILDRENS EMOTIONS; CULTURAL VARIATION; PARENTS BELIEFS; LAY THEORIES; VALIDATION; SCALE; LIFE; HAPPINESS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1271135
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Laypeople hold richly divergent beliefs about emotion, and these beliefs are consequential. Specific forms of belief that have been investigated include the usefulness, contagiousness, duration, dependence upon intersubjective experience, cognitively mediated properties, malleability, and hindering properties of emotion, just to name a few. Progress in this emerging sub-field of research has been hampered by the lack of a widely accepted definition of emotion belief able to capture all of these dimensions. Correspondingly, there has been a proliferation of different terminologies, constructs, and measures. The present review aims to address these obstacles by defining emotion belief, and subsequently re-considering existing constructs and measures that align with this definition. The latter is presented in the form of a comprehensive compendium of 21 different constructs and associated self-report measures that assess varying components of one's beliefs about emotions in general and/or about their own emotions, and an additional 5 scales that were designed to measure one's beliefs about another's emotions. From the more unified conceptualization of emotion belief presented here, critical areas of future research are highlighted.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Beliefs about emotion’s malleability influence state emotion regulation
    Elizabeth T. Kneeland
    Susan Nolen-Hoeksema
    John F. Dovidio
    June Gruber
    Motivation and Emotion, 2016, 40 : 740 - 749
  • [42] Contextual variation in beliefs about emotion and associated emotion regulation efforts
    Jennifer C. Veilleux
    Elise A. Warner
    Kaitlyn D. Chamberlain
    Katherine Hyde Brott
    Regina E. Schreiber
    Jeremy B. Clift
    Motivation and Emotion, 2023, 47 : 308 - 322
  • [43] Why Beliefs About Emotion Matter: An Emotion-Regulation Perspective
    Ford, Brett Q.
    Gross, James J.
    CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 28 (01) : 74 - 81
  • [44] Beliefs about emotion's malleability influence state emotion regulation
    Kneeland, Elizabeth T.
    Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan
    Dovidio, John F.
    Gruber, June
    MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2016, 40 (05) : 740 - 749
  • [45] EUReKA! A Conceptual Model of Emotion Understanding
    Castro, Vanessa L.
    Cheng, Yanhua
    Halberstadt, Amy G.
    Gruhn, Daniel
    EMOTION REVIEW, 2016, 8 (03) : 258 - 268
  • [46] Contextual variation in beliefs about emotion and associated emotion regulation efforts
    Veilleux, Jennifer C.
    Warner, Elise A.
    Chamberlain, Kaitlyn D.
    Brott, Katherine Hyde
    Schreiber, Regina E.
    Clift, Jeremy B.
    MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2023, 47 (03) : 308 - 322
  • [47] EMOTION REGULATION: CONCEPTUAL AND EMPIRICAL FOUNDATIONS
    Gross, James
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, : 16 - 16
  • [48] Conceptual Human Emotion Modeling (HEM)
    Elkobaisi, Mohammed R.
    Mayr, Heinrich C.
    Shekhovtsov, Vladimir A.
    ADVANCES IN CONCEPTUAL MODELING, ER 2020, 2020, 12584 : 71 - 81
  • [49] Emotion malleability beliefs influence emotion regulation and emotion recovery among individuals with depressive symptoms
    Kneeland, Elizabeth T.
    Simpson, Lauren E.
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2022, 36 (08) : 1613 - 1621
  • [50] THE A-PRIORI AND THE EMPIRICAL IN THEORIES OF EMOTION - SMEDSLUND CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS OF EMOTION
    EILAN, N
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 1992, 6 (06) : 457 - 466