Retrospective Clinical Evaluation of RMGIC/GIC Class V Restorations

被引:2
|
作者
Santos, Maria Jacinta M. C. [1 ]
Leon, Lucy [2 ]
Siddique, Imad [2 ]
Butler, Sheila [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Div Restorat Dent, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
关键词
glass ionomer; resin modified glass ionomer; Class V; clinical evaluation; GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT; CERVICAL LESIONS; POLYACRYLIC-ACID; SECONDARY CARIES; BOND STRENGTH; RETENTION; COMPOSITE; METAANALYSIS; ADHESIVES;
D O I
10.3390/dj11090225
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical performance of glass-ionomer cement (GIC) and resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) materials in Class V carious cervical lesions restored by dental students. Ninety-six (96) restorations performed with either GIC (Fuji IX) (n = 39) or RMGIC (Fuji II LC) (n = 57) were evaluated using the modified USPHS criteria by two independent investigators at two follow-up evaluations (two years apart). The Fisher statistical test was used to compare USPHS criteria and examine significant differences, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. The Kaplan-Meier algorithm was used to calculate the survival probability. The overall success rate of Class V restorations was 72.9% at the second follow-up evaluation, with restorations ranging in age from 2.5 to 3.5 years. The RMGIC (Fuji II LC) restorations exhibited a significantly higher overall success rate compared to the GIC (Fuji IX) restorations (p = 0.0104). Significant differences were observed in retention (p = 0.0034) and color match (p = 0.0023).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fluorescence microscopy for the evaluation of the margins of Class V restorations in vitro
    Heintze, SD
    Cavalleri, A
    Peschke, A
    Schüpbach, P
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2005, 7 (01): : 19 - 28
  • [22] Clinical evaluation of Prodigy® condensable in class II restorations
    Rose, J
    Sarrett, D
    Brooks, CN
    Shellard, E
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 163 - 163
  • [23] Comparative Analysis of Bilayered and Direct Restorations in Class V Lesions: A Retrospective Study
    Swathi, U. B.
    Ramesh, Sindhu
    Antony, Delphine Priscilla S.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 8 (07): : 504 - 510
  • [24] One-year clinical evaluation of two composite materials used for anterior class V restorations
    Sakrana, AA
    Tanoue, N
    Kawasaki, K
    Matsumura, H
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2004, 31 (10) : 985 - 990
  • [25] An ''in vitro'' evaluation of the microleakage in class V glass ionomer restorations.
    Miranda, M
    Dias, K
    Barceleiro, M
    Crippa, G
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 (05) : 1087 - 1087
  • [26] Argon laser or halogen light - Evaluation of microleakage in class V restorations
    Alves, EB
    Montoya, CA
    Silva, CM
    Matson, E
    Russo, EMA
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B206 - B206
  • [27] CLINICAL EVALUATION OF AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPOSITE IN CLASS-2 RESTORATIONS
    BINON, P
    MORRIS, C
    GARMAN, T
    KINZER, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1976, 55 : B191 - B191
  • [28] Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in class I and II restorations
    Mahler, DB
    Engle, JH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 131 (01): : 43 - 49
  • [29] Clinical evaluation of a compomer material in class II restorations.
    Benz, C
    Gust, C
    Folwaczny, M
    Benz, B
    Hickel, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 118 - 118
  • [30] CLINICAL EVALUATION OF CLASS-4 RESTORATIONS FOR COLOR STABILITY
    DENNISON, JB
    CRAIG, RG
    BOZELL, RR
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1979, 58 : 328 - 328