Effects of fluoxetine on fish: What do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future?

被引:23
|
作者
Correia, Daniela [1 ]
Domingues, Ines [1 ]
Faria, Melissa [2 ]
Oliveira, Miguel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, Ctr Environm & Marine Studies CESAM, Dept Biol, Campus Univ Santiago, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
[2] IDAEA CSIC, Jordi Girona 18, Barcelona 08034, Spain
关键词
SSRIs; Antidepressants; Serotonin; Effects; Environmental levels; SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS; ZEBRAFISH DANIO-RERIO; PHARMACEUTICAL POLLUTANT FLUOXETINE; SOLID-PHASE EXTRACTION; ENVIRONMENTALLY-RELEVANT CONCENTRATIONS; WASTE-WATER CONTAMINANTS; TRAP MASS-SPECTROMETRY; PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; SIAMESE FIGHTING FISH; ANTIDEPRESSANT FLUOXETINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159486
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Fluoxetine is one of the most studied and detected selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the aquatic environment, found at concentrations ranging from ng/L to mu g/L. Its presence in this environment can induce effects on aquatic or-ganisms that may compromise their fitness. Several experimental studies have demonstrated that fluoxetine can in-duce neurotoxicity, genetic and biochemical changes, and cause behavioral dysfunction in a wide range of fish species. However, contradictory results can be found. There is thus the need for a comprehensive review of the current state of knowledge on the effects of fluoxetine on fish at different levels of biological organization, highlighting inclu-sive patterns and discussing the potential causes for the contradictory results, that can be found in the available liter-ature. This review also aims to explore and identify the main gaps in knowledge and areas for future research. We conclude that environmentally relevant concentrations of fluoxetine (e.g., from 0.00345 mu g/L) produced adverse ef-fects and often this concentration range is not addressed in conventional environmental risk assessment strategies. Its environmental persistence and ionizable properties reinforce the need for standardized testing with representative aquatic models, targeting endpoints sensitive to the specific mode of action of fluoxetine, in order to assess and rank its actual environmental risk to aquatic ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Tourist Attribution toward Destination Brands: What Do We Know? What We Do Not Know? Where Should We Be Heading?
    Alamrawy, Mohamed Arfan Taha
    Hassan, Thowayeb H.
    Saleh, Mahmoud I.
    Abdelmoaty, Mostafa A.
    Salem, Amany E.
    Mahmoud, Hassan Marzok Elsayed
    Abdou, Ahmed H.
    Helal, Mohamed Y.
    Abdellmonaem, Amira Hassan
    El-Sisi, Shaymaa Abdul-Wahab
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [13] Chronic prostatitis: what we know, what we do not know, and what we should do!
    Lobel, B
    Rodriguez, A
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 21 (02) : 57 - 63
  • [14] Chronic prostatitis: what we know, what we do not know, and what we should do!
    B. Lobel
    A. Rodriguez
    World Journal of Urology, 2003, 21 : 57 - 63
  • [15] WHAT WE SHOULD KNOW IN RELATION TO WHAT WE DO KNOW
    Rice, Donald L.
    OCEANOGRAPHY, 2014, 27 (01) : 5 - 5
  • [16] Cardiovascular Effects of COVID-19 - What Do We Know and Where Should We Go?
    Ryan, Matthew
    Demir, Ozan
    O'Gallagher, Kevin
    Perera, Divaka
    HEART INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 14 (01): : 16 - 19
  • [17] Outcomes of Pancreaticoduodenectomy Where Should We Focus Our Efforts on Improving Outcomes?
    Brown, Erin G.
    Yang, Anthony
    Canter, Robert J.
    Bold, Richard J.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (07) : 694 - 699
  • [18] Complications and costs: Where should we focus our quality improvement efforts?
    Dimick, JB
    Pronovost, PJ
    Lipsett, PA
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (12) : A161 - A161
  • [19] Sarcophagus what do we know? What should we do?
    Borovoi, Aleksandr
    Nuclear Engineering International, 1996, 41 (05): : 28 - 30