Community views on the secondary use of general practice data: Findings from a mixed-methods study

被引:0
|
作者
Braunack-Mayer, Annette J. [1 ,2 ]
Adams, Carolyn [3 ]
Nettel-Aguirre, Alberto [4 ]
Fabrianesi, Belinda [1 ]
Carolan, Lucy [1 ]
Beilby, Justin [5 ]
Flack, Felicity [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Fac Arts Social Sci & Humanities, Australian Ctr Hlth Engagement Evidence & Values A, Sch Hlth & Soc, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Australian Hlth Serv Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Macquarie Univ, Macquarie Law Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Wollongong, Natl Inst Appl Stat Res Australia, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Wollongong, Sch Hlth & Soc, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Western Australia, Populat Hlth Res Network, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
community views; data linkage; data sharing; ethical issues; general practice data; research; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL-RECORDS; PUBLIC-ATTITUDES; HEALTH RESEARCH; INFORMATION; CONSENT; CARE; PRIVACY; TRUST;
D O I
10.1111/hex.13984
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionGeneral practice data, particularly when combined with hospital and other health service data through data linkage, are increasingly being used for quality assurance, evaluation, health service planning and research. In this study, we explored community views on sharing general practice data for secondary purposes, including research, to establish what concerns and conditions need to be addressed in the process of developing a social licence to support such use.MethodsWe used a mixed-methods approach with focus groups (November-December 2021), followed by a cross-sectional survey (March-April 2022).ResultsThe participants in this study strongly supported sharing general practice data with the clinicians responsible for their care, and where there were direct benefits for individual patients. Over 90% of survey participants (N = 2604) were willing to share their general practice information to directly support their health care, that is, for the primary purpose of collection. There was less support for sharing data for secondary purposes such as research and health service planning (36% and 45% respectively in broad agreement) or for linking general practice data to data in the education, social services and criminal justice systems (30%-36%). A substantial minority of participants were unsure or could not see how benefits would arise from sharing data for secondary purposes. Participants were concerned about the potential for privacy breaches, discrimination and data misuse and they wanted greater transparency and an opportunity to consent to data release.ConclusionThe findings of this study suggest that the public may be more concerned about sharing general practice data for secondary purposes than they are about sharing data collected in other settings. Sharing general practice data more broadly will require careful attention to patient and public concerns, including focusing on the factors that will sustain trust and legitimacy in general practice and GPs.Patient and Public ContributionMembers of the public were participants in the study. Data produced from their participation generated study findings.Clinical Trial RegistrationNot applicable.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Physician perspectives of abortion advocacy: findings from a mixed-methods study
    Manze, Meredith
    Romero, Diana
    Kwan, Amy
    Ellsworth, Taylor Rose
    Jones, Heidi
    BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2023, 49 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [22] Views on Researcher-Community Engagement in Autism Research in the United Kingdom: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Pellicano, Elizabeth
    Dinsmore, Adam
    Charman, Tony
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):
  • [23] Peer E-Cigarette and Cannabis Use and Adolescent Anxiety: Findings from a Mixed-Methods Study
    Lee, Ryan
    Herzig, Shirin Emma
    Ramirez, Carla Michelle
    Soto, Daniel
    Unger, Jennifer B.
    SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2025, 60 (05) : 648 - 658
  • [24] GP preferences for, access to, and use of evidence in clinical practice: a mixed-methods study
    O'Brien, Emer
    Walsh, Aisling
    Boland, Fiona
    Collins, Claire
    Harkins, Velma
    Smith, Susan M.
    O'Herlihy, Noirin
    Clyne, Barbara
    Wallace, Emma
    BJGP OPEN, 2023, 7 (04)
  • [25] Migrant physicians' choice of employment and the medical specialty general practice: a mixed-methods study
    Sturesson, Linda
    Palmgren, Per J.
    Ohlander, Magnus
    Nilsson, Gunnar H.
    Stenfors, Terese
    HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [26] At the intersection of belief and practice: A mixed-methods study of elementary general music educator praxis
    Salvador, Karen
    Svec, Christina
    Glaser, Jessica
    Sierzega, Amy
    Broadway, Alice
    PSYCHOLOGY OF MUSIC, 2022, 50 (05) : 1494 - 1510
  • [27] Training needs for staff providing remote services in general practice: a mixed-methods study
    Greenhalgh, Trisha
    Payne, Rebecca
    Hemmings, Nina
    Leach, Helen
    Hanson, Isabel
    Khan, Anwar
    Miller, Lisa
    Ladds, Emma
    Clarke, Aileen
    Shaw, Sara E.
    Dakin, Francesca
    Wieringa, Sietse
    Rybczynska-Bunt, Sarah
    Faulkner, Stuart D.
    Byng, Richard
    Kalin, Asli
    Moore, Lucy
    Wherton, Joseph
    Husain, Laiba
    Rosen, Rebecca
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2024, 74 (738): : E17 - E26
  • [28] Migrant physicians’ choice of employment and the medical specialty general practice: a mixed-methods study
    Linda Sturesson
    Per J. Palmgren
    Magnus Öhlander
    Gunnar H. Nilsson
    Terese Stenfors
    Human Resources for Health, 19
  • [29] Health literacy in pressure injury: Findings from a mixed-methods study of community-based patients and carers
    Durrant, Lisa A.
    Taylor, James
    Thompson, Helen
    Usher, Kim
    Jackson, Debra
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2019, 21 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [30] Beyond diagnosis and survivorship: findings from a mixed-methods study of a community-based cancer support service
    Blignault, Ilse
    McDonnell, Louise
    Aspinall, Diana
    Yates, Robyn
    Reath, Jennifer
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2017, 23 (04) : 391 - 396