Exploring integrity in Australian public services: A method to benchmark public service codes of conduct

被引:0
|
作者
Moon, Katie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Brunoro, David [1 ]
Connor, James [1 ]
Dickinson, Helen [1 ]
Huybers, Twan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Business, Publ Serv Res Grp, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Ctr Ecosyst Sci, Sch Biol Earth & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sch Business, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
assessment criteria; implementation; methodology; review; social science methods; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1111/1467-8500.12620
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Integrity is an ongoing concern in the public sector. Contemporary examples include fraud incidents, ethical violations, theft, and a disregard of legal advice resulting in significant harms to the public. Public service integrity management systems are interconnected frameworks of legislation and institutions intended to reduce such incidents, including Codes of Conduct (CoCs). A CoC is typically defined as a written set of norms that outline virtuous or desired behaviours, often creating or linking to sanctions for violations. Despite matters of integrity and corruption being a high concern for citizens, no method exists to compare monitoring, reporting, and review of CoCs across jurisdictions. We developed and applied a method to assess CoC implementation using specific assessment criteria developed by reviewing available content across jurisdictions and the current literature on CoCs and integrity management. Our results reveal substantial inconsistency between jurisdictions and a lack of available or accessible data for many CoC elements. Our method serves both as a tool for analysis of the effectiveness of CoCs over time and as an assessment of how jurisdictions are currently reporting on their compliance with their own CoCs.Points for practitionersA lack of evidence exists in terms of how CoCs are monitored, reported on, and reviewed.As a first stage of a research program, we develop and apply a method to all Australian states, territories, and the Australian Public Service to compare the monitoring, reporting, and review activities undertaken by these jurisdictions.Application of the method reveals opportunities for jurisdictions to improve the availability and accessibility of CoC data collection, reporting, and review.Auditors General and Public Accounts Committees should consider this method as part of their works programs and potentially use it to inform their scrutiny programs and requirements for performance and annual reporting.Public Service Commissions could find the data useful in adapting and improving their CoC monitoring, reporting, and review systems.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 735
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What Public Services are Suitable for Digitalization? - A Classification of Public Service Characteristics
    Lindgren, Ida
    Madsen, Christian Ostergaard
    Ryden, Hanne Hoglund
    Heggertveit, Ida
    Hofmann, Sara
    Saebo, Oystein
    ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT, EGOV 2024, 2024, 14841 : 201 - 217
  • [42] Universal and contextualized public services: Digital public service innovation framework
    Bertot, John
    Estevez, Elsa
    Janowski, Tomasz
    GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2016, 33 (02) : 211 - 222
  • [43] KNIGHTS AND KNAVES RETURN: PUBLIC SERVICE MOTIVATION AND THE DELIVERY OF PUBLIC SERVICES
    Le Grand, Julian
    INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 13 (01) : 56 - 71
  • [44] When public services fail: a research agenda on public service failure
    Van de Walle, Steven
    JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 27 (05) : 831 - 846
  • [45] New public management meets civic discontent? The Australian public service in 1999
    Curtin, J
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2000, 59 (01) : 115 - 124
  • [46] What the Secretary Said Next: 'Public Rhetorical Leadership' in the Australian Public Service
    Grube, Dennis
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2011, 70 (02) : 115 - 130
  • [47] Representations of New Public Management in Australian Public Service gender equality policies
    Williamson, Sue
    Carson, Lisa
    Foley, Meraiah
    EQUALITY DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION, 2020, 39 (02): : 235 - 250
  • [48] Athletic Training Services in Public Secondary Schools: A Benchmark Study
    Pryor, Riana R.
    Casa, Douglas J.
    Vandermark, Lesley W.
    Stearns, Rebecca L.
    Attanasio, Sarah M.
    Fontaine, Garrett J.
    Wafer, Alex M.
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2015, 50 (02) : 156 - 162
  • [49] Exploring innovation in public e-services
    Arduini, Davide
    Bianchi, Annaflavia
    Seri, Paolo
    Zanfei, Antonello
    TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2014, 38 (5-6) : 473 - 475
  • [50] Exploring MOOCs That Promote Innovative Public Services
    Yoshida, Masami
    Theeraroungchaisri, Anuchai
    Thammetar, Thapanee
    Khlaisang, Jintavee
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (24)