Interactive or tailored digital interventions to increase uptake in cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening to reduce health inequity: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Richardson-Parry, Afua [1 ,7 ]
Silva, Mitchell [2 ]
Valderas, Jose M. [3 ,4 ]
Donde, Shaantanu [1 ]
Woodruff, Seth [5 ]
van Vugt, Joris [6 ]
机构
[1] European Developed Markets Med Affairs Viatris, Hatfield, England
[2] Esperity, Innovat, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Family Med, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Ctr Res Hlth Syst Performance, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Viatris, North Amer Med Affairs, New York, NY USA
[6] Viatris, Med Affairs, Amstelveen, Netherlands
[7] Viatris, Bldg 4,Trident Pl,Mosquito Way, Hatfield AL10 9UL, England
关键词
apps; breast cancer; cancer screening; cervical cancer; colorectal cancer; digital health; health equity; health inequality; mammography; multimedia; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; EDUCATION INTERVENTION; AMERICAN WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; CARE; DISPARITIES; LITERACY; PROSTATE;
D O I
10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000796
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and objectivesSignificant health inequities exist in screening uptake for certain types of cancer. The review question was to identify and describe interactive, tailored digital, computer, and web-based interventions to reduce health inequity in cancer screening and review the effectiveness of such interventions in increasing screening rates versus usual care. MethodsWe searched four medical literature databases for randomized control trials (RCTs) published until 12 January 2023 that evaluated interventions aimed at increasing the percentage of breast, prostate, cervical, or colorectal cancer screening uptake. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to heterogeneity among studies. ResultsAfter screening 4200 titles and abstracts, 17 studies were included. Studies focused on colorectal (n = 10), breast (n = 4), cervical (n = 2), and prostate (n = 1) cancer screening. All were based in the USA except two. Most studies focused on ethnicity/race, while some included low-income populations. Intervention types were heterogeneous and used computer programs, apps, or web-based methods to provide tailored or interactive information to participants about screening risks and options. Some studies found positive effects for increasing cancer screening uptake in the intervention groups compared to usual care, but results were heterogeneous. ConclusionInterventions that use individual and cultural tailoring of cancer screening educational material should be further developed and investigated outside of the USA. Designing effective digital intervention strategies, with components that can be adapted to remote delivery may be an important strategy for reducing health inequities in cancer screening during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 409
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness of Leveraging Social Determinants of Health to Improve Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening A Systematic Review
    Mohan, Giridhar
    Chattopadhyay, Sajal
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (09) : 1434 - 1444
  • [42] Cost-Effectiveness of Leveraging Social Determinants of Health to Improve Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
    Mohan, Giridhar
    Chattopadhyay, Sajal
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2020, 75 (11) : 676 - 677
  • [43] Methods for conducting systematic reviews of evidence on effectiveness and economic efficiency of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers
    Baron, Roy C.
    Rimer, Barbara K.
    Coates, Ralph J.
    Kerner, Jon
    Mullen, Patricia Dolan
    Chattopadhyay, Sajal
    Briss, Peter A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 35 (01) : S26 - S33
  • [44] Efficacy of interventions to increase the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care: a systematic review
    Rebecca J Guy
    Hammad Ali
    Bette Liu
    Simone Poznanski
    James Ward
    Basil Donovan
    John Kaldor
    Jane Hocking
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 11
  • [45] Efficacy of interventions to increase the uptake of chlamydia screening in primary care: a systematic review
    Guy, Rebecca J.
    Ali, Hammad
    Liu, Bette
    Poznanski, Simone
    Ward, James
    Donovan, Basil
    Kaldor, John
    Hocking, Jane
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 11
  • [46] A systematic review of ethnic disparities in the uptake of colorectal cancer screening
    Singh, H. K. Sekhon Inderjit
    Lal, N.
    Majeed, A.
    Pawa, N.
    PERSPECTIVES IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 143 (02) : 105 - 120
  • [47] A Systematic Review of Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention Interventions for Latinas
    Falk, Derek
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 24 : 177 - 178
  • [48] Interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake among African-American men: A systematic review
    Riley, Colin
    Rogers, Charles R.
    Huntington, Matthew
    Foster, Margaret
    Boucher, Kenneth M.
    Okuyemi, Kola
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2020, 29 (06)
  • [49] Effect of Behavioral Interventions on the Uptake of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yakoubovitch, Stephanie
    Zaki, Timothy
    Anand, Sanya
    Pecoriello, Jillian
    Liang, Peter S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : 1829 - 1840
  • [50] A review - Obesity and screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer in women
    Cohen, Sarah S.
    Palmieri, Rachel T.
    Nyante, Sarah J.
    Koraiek, Daniel O.
    Kim, Sangmi
    Bradshaw, Patrick
    Olshan, Andrew F.
    CANCER, 2008, 112 (09) : 1892 - 1904