Investor protection: effects of takeover convergence

被引:2
|
作者
Dixit, Jyoti [1 ]
Singh, Poonam [2 ]
Haldar, Arunima [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Ind Engn, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[2] Natl Inst Ind Engn, Dept Finance & Econ, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[3] SP Jain Inst Management & Res, Dept Finance, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
关键词
India; Corporate governance; Convergence; Investor protection; Takeover regulation; G34; G30; B27; G38; CORPORATE-OWNERSHIP; EMERGING MARKETS; BOARD; FAMILY; MATTER; LAW;
D O I
10.1108/IJOA-05-2021-2741
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose Takeovers play a critical role as an external corporate governance mechanism to ensure investor protection. There is a long-standing debate on whether the convergence of corporate governance to global standards can enable emerging economies to ensure investor protection. This paper aims to analyse the evolution of the takeover code, namely, Securities Exchange Board of India's Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers (2011) in India from the lens of investor protection. It then compares the takeover provisions in India, the USA, the UK, Singapore and Australia to examine the extent of convergence and its implications for investor protection. Design/methodology/approach Using a cross-national comparative analysis of takeover mechanisms in common law countries, the study analyses the extent and relevance of convergence in form. The focus of the comparison is on regulations governing offer size, offer price, creeping acquisition and initial trigger limit for the mandatory open offer. Findings The findings suggest that certain provisions such as the initial trigger threshold for the mandatory offer and the offer prices of the Indian takeover code are converging with the standards in common law countries. However, the offer price determination based on market prices may not reflect true market value in an inefficient market like India. Other provisions such as creeping acquisition and offer size are not only diverging from the international standards but are also inconsistent with the key objective of investor protections of the Indian regulator. Research limitations/implications Indian takeover regulation needs to converge to higher global standards to ensure adherence to improved investor protection. This needs to be done for the initial trigger limit for mandatory bid and offer prices, after accounting for the differences in institutional structure. The Indian regulators need to revisit provisions on the initial trigger, creeping acquisition to converge to the broader principle of investor protection. Originality/value This technical paper provides a comprehensive depiction of takeover mechanisms in an emerging economy context as a means of investor protection. Further using a comparative lens, it analyses the relevance of convergence of takeover laws. Thus, advances the theoretical knowledge of limited extant work on external corporate governance mechanism in an emerging economy context.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 906
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Investor protection and the value effects of bank merger announcements in Europe and the US
    Hagendorff, Jens
    Collins, Michael
    Keasey, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2008, 32 (07) : 1333 - 1348
  • [32] Legal Investor Protection and Takeovers
    Burkart, Mike
    Gromb, Denis
    Mueller, Holger M.
    Panunzi, Fausto
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2014, 69 (03): : 1129 - 1165
  • [33] The Trouble with Foreign Investor Protection
    Eichberger, Fabian Simon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2021, 32 (03) : 1111 - 1117
  • [34] Investor protection and corporate valuation
    La Porta, R
    Lopez-De-Silanes, F
    Shleifer, A
    Vishny, R
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (03): : 1147 - 1170
  • [35] Investor protection and corporate governance
    La Porta, R
    Lopez-De-Silanes, F
    Shleifer, A
    Vishny, R
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 58 (1-2) : 3 - 27
  • [36] INVESTOR PROTECTION: SEGREGATION OF ASSETS
    Jukna, Tatjana
    Grasis, Janis
    ACCESS-ACCESS TO SCIENCE BUSINESS INNOVATION IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY, 2023, 4 (02): : 168 - 181
  • [37] Investor protection and business creation
    Hyytinen, Ari
    Takalo, Tuomas
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2008, 28 (02) : 113 - 122
  • [38] Dividend Smoothing and Investor Protection
    Dzidic, Ante
    Orsag, Silvije
    ZAGREB INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & BUSINESS, 2019, 22 (02): : 55 - 70
  • [39] Investor Protection and Asset Prices
    Basak, Suleyman
    Chabakauri, Georgy
    Yavuz, M. Deniz
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2019, 32 (12): : 4905 - 4946
  • [40] Empirical analysis of effects of country-level governance to strength of investor protection
    Bota-Avram, Cristina
    PROCEEDINGS OF 9TH INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 2013, 99 : 1063 - 1072