Identification of Plausible Candidates in Prostate Cancer Using Integrated Machine Learning Approaches

被引:2
|
作者
Kour, Bhumandeep [1 ,2 ]
Shukla, Nidhi [2 ,3 ]
Bhargava, Harshita [4 ]
Sharma, Devendra [5 ]
Sharma, Amita [4 ]
Singh, Anjuvan [6 ]
Valadi, Jayaraman [7 ]
Sadasukhi, Trilok Chand [8 ]
Vuree, Sugunakar [2 ,9 ]
Suravajhala, Prashanth [2 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Lovely Profess Univ, Dept Biotechnol, Jalandhar, Punjab, India
[2] Bioclues Org, Hyderabad, India
[3] Birla Inst Sci Res, Dept Biotechnol & Bioinformat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
[4] IIS Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
[5] Rukmani Birla Hosp, Urol & Renal Transplant Dept Renal Sci, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
[6] Lovely Profess Univ, Sch Bioengn & Biosci, Dept Biotechnol, Phagwara 144001, Punjab, India
[7] FLAME Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[8] Mahatma Gandhi Univ Med Sci & Technol, Dept Urol & Renal Transplant, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
[9] MNR Univ, MNR Med Coll & Hosp, MNR Fdn Res & Innovat, Fasalwadi, Telangana, India
[10] Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amrita Sch Biotechnol, Kollam, Kerala, India
关键词
cBioPortal; prostate cancer; biomarkers; machine learning; bioinformatics; Prostate-Specific Antigens (PSA); GLYCATED HEMOGLOBIN; MOLECULAR-MECHANISMS; RISK; OBESITY; MULTIPLE; SERVER; COUNT; HBA1C;
D O I
10.2174/0113892029240239231109082805
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background Currently, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is commonly used as a prostate cancer (PCa) biomarker. PSA is linked to some factors that frequently lead to erroneous positive results or even needless biopsies of elderly people.Objectives In this pilot study, we undermined the potential genes and mutations from several databases and checked whether or not any putative prognostic biomarkers are central to the annotation. The aim of the study was to develop a risk prediction model that could help in clinical decision-making.Methods An extensive literature review was conducted, and clinical parameters for related comorbidities, such as diabetes, obesity, as well as PCa, were collected. Such parameters were chosen with the understanding that variations in their threshold values could hasten the complicated process of carcinogenesis, more particularly PCa. The gathered data was converted to semi-binary data (-1, -0.5, 0, 0.5, and 1), on which machine learning (ML) methods were applied. First, we cross-checked various publicly available datasets, some published RNA-seq datasets, and our whole-exome sequencing data to find common role players in PCa, diabetes, and obesity. To narrow down their common interacting partners, interactome networks were analysed using GeneMANIA and visualised using Cytoscape, and later cBioportal was used (to compare expression level based on Z scored values) wherein various types of mutation w.r.t their expression and mRNA expression (RNA seq FPKM) plots are available. The GEPIA 2 tool was used to compare the expression of resulting similarities between the normal tissue and TCGA databases of PCa. Later, top-ranking genes were chosen to demonstrate striking clustering coefficients using the Cytoscape-cytoHubba module, and GEPIA 2 was applied again to ascertain survival plots.Results Comparing various publicly available datasets, it was found that BLM is a frequent player in all three diseases, whereas comparing publicly available datasets, GWAS datasets, and published sequencing findings, SPFTPC and PPIMB were found to be the most common. With the assistance of GeneMANIA, TMPO and FOXP1 were found as common interacting partners, and they were also seen participating with BLM.Conclusion A probabilistic machine learning model was achieved to identify key candidates between diabetes, obesity, and PCa. This, we believe, would herald precision scale modeling for easy prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 306
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] USING A MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHM TO PREDICT PROSTATE CANCER GRADE
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    Cindolo, Luca
    Sarchi, Luca
    Iseppi, Andrea
    Rizzo, Mino
    Riccardo, Bertolo
    Minervini, Andrea
    Sessa, Francesco
    Muto, Gianluca
    Bove, Pierluigi
    Vittori, Matteo
    Bozzini, Giorgio
    Arsizio, Busto
    Castellan, Pietro
    Mugavero, Filippo
    Panfilo, Daniele
    Saccani, Sebastiano
    Falsaperla, Mario
    Schips, Luigi
    Celia, Antonio
    Bada, Maida
    del Grappa, Bassano
    Porreca, Angelo
    Pastore, Antonio
    Yazan, Al Salhi
    Marco, Giampaoli
    Novella, Giovanni
    Rizzetto, Riccardo
    Trabacchin, Nicolo
    Guglielmo, Mantica
    Pini, Giovannalberto
    Lombardo, Riccardo
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Antonelli, Alessandro
    Tubaro, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1236 - E1236
  • [32] Prediction of Prostate Cancer using Ensemble of Machine Learning Techniques
    Oyewo, O. A.
    Boyinbode, O. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 11 (03) : 149 - 154
  • [33] Identification of Extended Emission Gamma-Ray Burst Candidates Using Machine Learning
    Garcia-Cifuentes, K.
    Becerra, R. L.
    De Colle, F.
    Cabrera, J. I.
    Del Burgo, C.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 951 (01):
  • [34] Machine learning approaches for person identification and verification
    Srinivasan, H
    Beal, MJ
    Srihari, SN
    SENSORS, AND COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, AND INTELLIGENCE (C31) TECHNOLOGIES FOR HOMELAND SECURITY AND HOMELAND DEFENSE IV, PTS 1 AND 2, 2005, 5778 : 574 - 586
  • [35] Identification of Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer With Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning
    Yang, Ruixin
    Zhu, Di
    Howard, Lauren E.
    De Hoedt, Amanda
    Williams, Stephen B.
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    Klaassen, Zachary
    JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2022, 6 : e2100071
  • [36] Machine learning algorithm to define optimal candidates for active surveillance in intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Baboudjian, M.
    Breda, A.
    Roumeguere, T.
    Uleri, A.
    Roche, J.
    Touzani, A.
    Lacetera, V
    Beauval, J.
    Diamand, R.
    Simone, G.
    Windisch, O.
    Benamran, D.
    Fourcade, A.
    Fiard, G.
    Roumiguie, M.
    Oderda, M.
    Barret, E.
    Fromont, G.
    Dariane, C.
    Gondran-Tellier, B.
    Ruffion, A.
    Van den Bergh, R.
    Peltier, A.
    Ploussard, G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83
  • [37] Machine-learning approaches to select Wolf-Rayet candidates
    Marston, A. P.
    Morello, G.
    Morris, P.
    Van Dyk, S.
    Mauerhan, J.
    LIVES AND DEATH-THROES OF MASSIVE STARS, 2017, 12 (S329): : 422 - 422
  • [38] Identification of RNA-binding protein residues using machine learning approaches
    Huang, HC
    2005 EMERGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (EITC), 2005, : 120 - 121
  • [39] Machine Learning Approaches for Phase Identification Using Process Variables in Batch Processes
    Gaertler, Marco
    Hollender, Martin
    Kloepper, Benjamin
    Maczey, Sylvia
    Tan, Ruomu
    Song, Chen
    Baehner, Franz David
    Kraemer, Stefan
    Just, Gregor
    Khaydarov, Valentin
    Urbas, Leon
    Gedda, Rebecca
    CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2023, 95 (07) : 989 - 1002
  • [40] Breast Cancer Subtype Identification Using Machine Learning Techniques
    Firoozbakht, Forough
    Rezaeian, Iman
    Porter, Lisa
    Rueda, Luis
    2014 IEEE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL ADVANCES IN BIO AND MEDICAL SCIENCES (ICCABS), 2014,