Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars with Class II Cavities Restored with Glass Hybrid Restorative System and Nanohybrid Composite Resin: An In-vitro Study

被引:0
|
作者
Savaliya, Krushn [1 ]
Kishan, Karkala Venkappa [2 ,4 ]
Shroff, Manan Gaurang [2 ]
Saklecha, Purnima [3 ]
Mavani, Harshit Tushar [2 ]
Kaur, Supreet [2 ]
Volety, Shreya [2 ]
机构
[1] KM Shah Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Surat, Gujarat, India
[2] KM Shah Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
[3] KM Shah Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[4] Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, KM Shah Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Room 8, Vadodara 391760, Gujarat, India
关键词
Class; 2; cavities; EQUIA forte; Fracture resistance; Thermocycling procedure; CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE; IONOMER;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2023/58969.17591
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Maxillary premolars are the most susceptible teeth to fracture if both marginal ridges are compromised. Composite restorations have performed remarkably in restoring the marginal ridges. However, it has certain disadvantages, thus to overcome this, modified glass ionomer based restorative materials with improved mechanical properties were introduced. Aim: To compare and evaluate the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with class II Mesio-Occluso-Distal (MOD) cavities which received Glass hybrid restorative system and Nanohybrid Composite resin. Materials and Methods: The present study was an in-vitro study at KM Shah Dental College and Hospital, Vadodara, Gujarat from December 2019 to June 2020, on 30 Extracted Maxillary premolars were selected. Total samples were divided into group A (n=15) restored by glass hybrid restorative system and group B (n=15) restored by nanohybrid composite resin. Standardised class II MOD Cavity preparation was done in all the samples. The samples were subjected to a thermocycling procedure, and a universal testing machine measured the fracture resistance. Data obtained from all the samples was analysed by Independent sample t-test with a p-value set at less than 0.05. Results: In group A, mean fracture resistance (at mean force 947.07 +/- 236.41) was found to be greater than in Group B. However, the difference among the groups was not statistically significant with a p-value of 0.555. Conclusion: Glass Hybrid restorative system showed better fracture resistance than Nanohybrid Composite Resin in maxillary premolars with class II MOD Cavities.
引用
收藏
页码:ZC17 / ZC19
页数:3
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars With Class II MOD Cavities Restored With Direct and Indirect Resin Composite Restorative Systems
    Salama, Rasha M.
    Hamama, Hamdi H.
    Mahmoud, Salah H.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2025,
  • [2] Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with Class II MOD cavities restored with ormocer, nanofilled, and nanoceramic composite restorative systems
    Taha, Dina Gamal
    Abdel-Samad, Abdou Abdel-Fatah
    Mahmoud, Salah Hasab
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 42 (07): : 579 - 587
  • [3] Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars with Class II MOD Cavities Restored with Novel Nanocomposites Including Fibre Reinforced Composite Restorative System: A Step Ahead in Composite Dentistry
    Joshi, Chintan
    Patel, Mahendra
    Desai, Parth
    Patel, Pathik
    ADVANCES IN HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2014, 4 (02) : 14 - 21
  • [4] Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Failure Modes of Maxillary Premolars Restored with Different Coronal Designed Fiber Posts: In Vitro Study
    Gok, Tuba
    Durdu, Ege
    Atik, Mehmet Rasit
    Konus, Furkan
    Gok, Adem
    EUROPEAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2025, 10 (01): : 58 - 65
  • [5] Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolars Restored with Flowable Short Fibre-Reinforced Resin Composite-An In Vitro Study
    Sharma, Apoorva
    Amirtharaj, Lourdusanny Vijay
    Sanjeev, Kavitha
    Mahalaxmi, Sekar
    EUROPEAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2022, 7 (02): : 161 - 166
  • [6] In-vitro evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth restored with different high-viscosity glass ionomer restorative materials and bulk-fill composite resins
    Nezir, Merve
    Ozcan, Suat
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 28 (06)
  • [7] Marginal Microleakage in Class II Cavities Restored with Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements: a Comparative Study
    Rodrigues Cajazeira, Marlus Roberto
    Sampaio Filho, Helio Rodrigues
    Martins Moliterno, Luiz Flavio
    PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2008, 8 (02): : 191 - 195
  • [8] Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Glass Hybrid Restorative Materials Simulated by Tooth Brushing: An in-Vitro Study
    Komandla, Divya Rao
    Acharya, Shashi Rashmi
    Pentapati, Kalyana Chakravarthy
    PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2021, 21
  • [9] Influence of proximal contacts and FRC posts on the fracture behavior of premolars with class II composite restorations: An in-vitro study
    Krug, Klaus-Peter
    Otter, Stephanie E.
    Knauber, Andreas W.
    Erdelt, Kurt-Juergen
    Nothdurft, Frank P.
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2013, 32 (06) : 952 - 958
  • [10] Fracture resistance in severely damaged primary maxillary central incisors restored with glass fiber and composite posts: An in vitro study
    Kooshki, Fahimeh
    Boroojeni, Helia Sadat Haeri
    Shekarchi, Fatemeh
    Rahimi, Reyhaneh
    DENTAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS, 2025, 62 (01) : 107 - 113