Assessment of landslide susceptibility along mountain highways based on different machine learning algorithms and mapping units by hybrid factors screening and sample optimization

被引:71
|
作者
Sun, Deliang [1 ]
Gu, Qingyu [1 ]
Wen, Haijia [2 ]
Xu, Jiahui [3 ]
Zhang, Yalan [2 ]
Shi, Shuxian [1 ]
Xue, Mengmeng [2 ]
Zhou, Xinzhi [2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Normal Univ, Key Lab GIS Applicat Res, Chongqing 401331, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Natl Joint Engn Res Ctr Geohazards Prevent Reservo, Sch Civil Engn, Key Lab New Technol Construction Cities Mt Area, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China
[3] East China Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Geog Informat Sci, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Landslide susceptibility; Machine-learning algorithms; Mapping units; Factors screening; Sample optimization; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; RANDOM FOREST; RISK-ASSESSMENT; DECISION TREE; MODELS; NETWORK; SELECTION; COUNTY; SVM;
D O I
10.1016/j.gr.2022.07.013
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
To develop a better spatial prediction model of landslide susceptibility along mountain highways, this study compared assessment models of landslide susceptibility along mountain highways based on different machine-learning-algorithms (random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM)), and mapping units (grid and slope units) using factor screening and sample optimization. Using a typical mountainous county, Chengkou, as a case study, a landslide inventory was prepared based on field investigations, satellite images, and historical records. In total, 334 landslides were identified. Twenty landslide conditioning factors influenced by topography, geology, environmental conditions, and human activities were initially identified. Less important conditioning factors were identified and eliminated using a geographical detector. Two common non-linear machine-learning models (RF and SVM) were used under the grid and slope units, and on all cells (including landslides and non-landslides); 10-fold cross-validation was utilized to select the training and validation datasets for these models. Subsequently, the trained models were utilized for landslide susceptibility mapping in the entire study area, divided into five classes. Subsequently, the performance of the models under different units was evaluated using a confusion matrix and receiver operating characteristic curve. Finally, partial dependency plots (PDP) and local interpretable modelagnostic explanations (LIME) were used to study the interpretability of landslide susceptibility model. The research results show that after removing the noise-generating factors, the model trained by the remaining 11 landslide-conditioning factors can deliver ideal forecast accuracy. In this study, the evaluation results of the slope unit for the RF or SVM model were more accurate and reasonable than those of the grid unit. In this case, the slope unit was found to be ideal. Under both the slope and grid units, the performance of the RF model was better than that of the SVM model. This study provides a reference for the spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility along mountain highways. (c) 2022 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 106
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Combining logistic regression-based hybrid optimized machine learning algorithms with sensitivity analysis to achieve robust landslide susceptibility mapping
    Alqadhi, Saeed
    Mallick, Javed
    Talukdar, Swapan
    Bindajam, Ahmed Ali
    Saha, Tamal Kanti
    Ahmed, Mohd
    Khan, Roohul Abad
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (25) : 9518 - 9543
  • [22] GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment using optimized hybrid machine learning methods
    Chen, Xi
    Chen, Wei
    CATENA, 2021, 196
  • [23] Evaluation of different machine learning models and novel deep learning-based algorithm for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Zhang, Tingyu
    Li, Yanan
    Wang, Tao
    Wang, Huanyuan
    Chen, Tianqing
    Sun, Zenghui
    Luo, Dan
    Li, Chao
    Han, Ling
    GEOSCIENCE LETTERS, 2022, 9 (01)
  • [24] Evaluation of different machine learning models and novel deep learning-based algorithm for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Tingyu Zhang
    Yanan Li
    Tao Wang
    Huanyuan Wang
    Tianqing Chen
    Zenghui Sun
    Dan Luo
    Chao Li
    Ling Han
    Geoscience Letters, 9
  • [25] Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Based on Different MaChine Learning Methods in Zhaoping County of Eastern Guangxi
    Kong, Chunfang
    Tian, Yiping
    Ma, Xiaogang
    Weng, Zhengping
    Zhang, Zhiting
    Xu, Kai
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (18)
  • [26] Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based machine learning algorithms for the Northeast Chongqing Area, China
    Zhigang Bai
    Qimeng Liu
    Yu Liu
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (24)
  • [27] Combined landslide inventory and susceptibility assessment based on different mapping units: an example from the Flemish Ardennes, Belgium
    Van Den Eeckhaut, M.
    Reichenbach, P.
    Guzzetti, F.
    Rossi, M.
    Poesen, J.
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2009, 9 (02) : 507 - 521
  • [28] Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) based on different boosting and hyperparameter optimization algorithms: A case of Wanzhou District, China
    Sun, Deliang
    Wang, Jing
    Wen, Haijia
    Ding, YueKai
    Mi, Changlin
    JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 16 (08) : 3221 - 3232
  • [29] Correction: Evaluation of different machine learning models and novel deep learning-based algorithm for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Tingyu Zhang
    Yanan Li
    Tao Wang
    Huanyuan Wang
    Tianqing Chen
    Zenghui Sun
    Dan Luo
    Chao Li
    Ling Han
    Geoscience Letters, 10
  • [30] Optimizing Machine Learning Algorithms for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping along the Karakoram Highway, Gilgit Baltistan, Pakistan: A Comparative Study of Baseline, Bayesian, and Metaheuristic Hyperparameter Optimization Techniques
    Abbas, Farkhanda
    Zhang, Feng
    Ismail, Muhammad
    Khan, Garee
    Iqbal, Javed
    Alrefaei, Abdulwahed Fahad
    Albeshr, Mohammed Fahad
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (15)