Comparison of the diagnostic performance of three ultrasound thyroid nodule risk stratification systems for follicular thyroid neoplasm: K-TIRADS, ACR -TIRADS and C-TIRADS

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Hua-Juan [1 ]
Yang, Yu-Ping [1 ]
Liang, Xin [1 ]
Zhang, Zhi [2 ]
Xu, Xiao-Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Med Univ, Dept Ultrasound, Affiliated Hosp, Zhanjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Med Univ, Dept Thyroid & Mammary Vasc Surg, Affiliated Hosp, Zhanjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
TIRADS; follicular thyroid adenoma; follicular thyroid carcinoma; CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND; FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; CONVENTIONAL ULTRASOUND; EGGSHELL CALCIFICATION; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; WHITE PAPER; FEATURES; CARCINOMA; CANCER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3233/CH-231898
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To explore the diagnostic performance of the currently used ultrasound-based thyroid nodule risk stratification systems (K-TIRADS, ACR -TIRADS, and C-TIRADS) in differentiating follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA) from follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC). METHODS: Clinical data and preoperative ultrasonographic images of 269 follicular thyroid neoplasms were retrospectively analyzed. All of them were detected by Color Doppler ultrasound instruments equipped with high-frequency liner array probes (e.g. Toshiba Apoli500 with L5-14MHZ; Philips IU22 with L5-12MHZ; GE LOGIQ E9 with L9-12MHZ and MyLab Class C with L9-14MHZ). The diagnostic performance of three TIRADS classifications for differentiating FTA from FTC was evaluated by drawing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating the cut-off values. RESULTS: Of the 269 follicular neoplasms (mean size, 3.67 +/- 1.53 cm), 209 were FTAs (mean size, 3.56 +/- 1.38 cm) and 60 were FTCs (mean size, 4.07 +/- 1.93 cm). There were significant differences in ultrasound features such as margins, calcifications, and vascularity of thyroid nodules between the FTA and FTC groups (P < 0.05). According to the ROC curve comparison analysis, the diagnostic cut-off values of K-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and C-TIRADS for identifying FTA and FTC were K-TR4, ACR-TR4, and C-TR4B, respectively, and the areas under the curves were 0.676, 0.728, and 0.719, respectively. The difference between ACR-TIRADS and K-TIRADS classification was statistically significant (P = 0.0241), whereas the differences between ACR-TIRADS and C-TIRADS classification and between K-TIRADS and C-TIRADS classification were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The three TIRADS classifications were not conducive to distinguishing FTA from FTC. It is necessary to develop a novel malignant risk stratification system specifically for the identification of follicular thyroid neoplasms.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 406
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of the efficacy of EU-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS in risk stratification of pediatric patients with thyroid nodules
    Tuli, Gerdi
    Munarin, Jessica
    Scollo, Mariapia
    Quaglino, Francesco
    De Sanctis, Luisa
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [22] Impact of the Hypoechogenicity Criteria on Thyroid Nodule Malignancy Risk Stratification Performance by Different TIRADS Systems
    Popova, Nina Malika
    Radzina, Maija
    Prieditis, Peteris
    Liepa, Mara
    Rauda, Madara
    Stepanovs, Kaspars
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [23] Comparison of Diagnostic Values of ACR TI-RADS versus C-TIRADS Scoring and Classification Systems for the Elderly Thyroid Cancers
    Huang, Hu
    Zhu, Ming-Jie
    Gao, Qi
    Huang, Yan-Li
    Li, Wei-Min
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2023, 16 : 4441 - 4451
  • [24] Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: From Ultrasound Features to TIRADS
    Rago, Teresa
    Vitti, Paolo
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [25] Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of ACR-TIRADS, American Thyroid Association (ATA), and EU-TIRADS guidelines in detecting thyroid malignancy
    Koc, Ali Murat
    Adibelli, Zehra Hilal
    Erkul, Zehra
    Sahin, Yasemin
    Dilek, Ismail
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 133
  • [26] Diagnostic Performance of Different Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (Kwak-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS and ACR TI-RADS) for Risk Stratification of Small Thyroid Nodules (≤10 mm)
    Schenke, Simone
    Klett, Rigobert
    Seifert, Philipp
    Kreissl, Michael C.
    Goerges, Rainer
    Zimny, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [27] Interest of researchers in ultrasound systems for risk stratification of thyroid nodules (TIRADS): a systematic review
    Pierpaolo Trimboli
    Giulia Ferrarazzo
    Maurilio Deandrea
    Chiara Camponovo
    Francesco Romanelli
    Arnoldo Piccardo
    Cosimo Durante
    Clinical and Translational Imaging, 2022, 10 : 185 - 190
  • [28] Malignancy risk stratification and subcategorization of K-TIRADS intermediate suspicion thyroid nodules: a retrospective multicenter study
    Lee, Boeun
    Na, Dong Gyu
    Kim, Ji-hoon
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2024, 43 (02) : 132 - 140
  • [29] Use of Diagnostic Criteria from ACR and EU-TIRADS Systems to Improve the Performance of Cytology in Thyroid Nodule Triage
    Seminati, Davide
    Capitoli, Giulia
    Leni, Davide
    Fior, Davide
    Vacirca, Francesco
    Di Bella, Camillo
    Galimberti, Stefania
    L'Imperio, Vincenzo
    Pagni, Fabio
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [30] Interest of researchers in ultrasound systems for risk stratification of thyroid nodules (TIRADS): a systematic review
    Trimboli, Pierpaolo
    Ferrarazzo, Giulia
    Deandrea, Maurilio
    Camponovo, Chiara
    Romanelli, Francesco
    Piccardo, Arnoldo
    Durante, Cosimo
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL IMAGING, 2022, 10 (02) : 185 - 190