Comparison of the diagnostic performance of three ultrasound thyroid nodule risk stratification systems for follicular thyroid neoplasm: K-TIRADS, ACR -TIRADS and C-TIRADS

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Hua-Juan [1 ]
Yang, Yu-Ping [1 ]
Liang, Xin [1 ]
Zhang, Zhi [2 ]
Xu, Xiao-Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Med Univ, Dept Ultrasound, Affiliated Hosp, Zhanjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Med Univ, Dept Thyroid & Mammary Vasc Surg, Affiliated Hosp, Zhanjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
TIRADS; follicular thyroid adenoma; follicular thyroid carcinoma; CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND; FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; CONVENTIONAL ULTRASOUND; EGGSHELL CALCIFICATION; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; WHITE PAPER; FEATURES; CARCINOMA; CANCER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3233/CH-231898
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To explore the diagnostic performance of the currently used ultrasound-based thyroid nodule risk stratification systems (K-TIRADS, ACR -TIRADS, and C-TIRADS) in differentiating follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA) from follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC). METHODS: Clinical data and preoperative ultrasonographic images of 269 follicular thyroid neoplasms were retrospectively analyzed. All of them were detected by Color Doppler ultrasound instruments equipped with high-frequency liner array probes (e.g. Toshiba Apoli500 with L5-14MHZ; Philips IU22 with L5-12MHZ; GE LOGIQ E9 with L9-12MHZ and MyLab Class C with L9-14MHZ). The diagnostic performance of three TIRADS classifications for differentiating FTA from FTC was evaluated by drawing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating the cut-off values. RESULTS: Of the 269 follicular neoplasms (mean size, 3.67 +/- 1.53 cm), 209 were FTAs (mean size, 3.56 +/- 1.38 cm) and 60 were FTCs (mean size, 4.07 +/- 1.93 cm). There were significant differences in ultrasound features such as margins, calcifications, and vascularity of thyroid nodules between the FTA and FTC groups (P < 0.05). According to the ROC curve comparison analysis, the diagnostic cut-off values of K-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and C-TIRADS for identifying FTA and FTC were K-TR4, ACR-TR4, and C-TR4B, respectively, and the areas under the curves were 0.676, 0.728, and 0.719, respectively. The difference between ACR-TIRADS and K-TIRADS classification was statistically significant (P = 0.0241), whereas the differences between ACR-TIRADS and C-TIRADS classification and between K-TIRADS and C-TIRADS classification were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The three TIRADS classifications were not conducive to distinguishing FTA from FTC. It is necessary to develop a novel malignant risk stratification system specifically for the identification of follicular thyroid neoplasms.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 406
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validating and Comparing C-TIRADS, K-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS in Stratifying the Malignancy Risk of Thyroid Nodules
    Chen, Qingfang
    Lin, Mingnan
    Wu, Size
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [2] Comparison of the C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and ATA guidelines in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules
    Cai, Yifeng
    Yang, Ruixuan
    Yang, Shuhui
    Lu, Laishun
    Ma, Rui
    Xiao, Zidong
    Lin, Nie
    Huang, Yuhan
    Chen, Liwen
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2023, 13 (07) : 4514 - 4525
  • [3] A Review about C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and K-TIRADS Combined with Real-Time Tissue Elastography to Diagnose Thyroid Nodules
    Ma, Yan
    Huo, Xiaoguang
    Kong, Shanshan
    Xu, Wenzhe
    Zhao, Wei
    Zhu, Min
    DISCOVERY MEDICINE, 2023, 35 (174) : 1 - 10
  • [4] Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of K-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS guidelines for detection of thyroid malignancy on ultrasound
    Marukatat, N.
    Parklug, P.
    Chanasriyotin, C.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2023, 29 (05) : 862 - 866
  • [5] Comparative Study of C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS for Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules
    Jin, Zhe
    Pei, Shufang
    Shen, Hui
    Ouyang, Lizhu
    Zhang, Lu
    Mo, Xiaokai
    Chen, Qiuying
    You, Jingjing
    Zhang, Shuixing
    Zhang, Bin
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2023, 30 (10) : 2181 - 2191
  • [6] Comparison of Diagnostic Performances of ATA Guidelines, ACR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS and Modified K-TIRADS: A Single Center Study of 4238 Thyroid Nodules
    Ozdemir, Mustafa
    Turk, Gamze
    Bilgili, Mustafa
    Akay, Ebru
    Koc, Ali
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES, 2025, 133 (02) : 98 - 104
  • [7] Diagnostic performance of ACR-TIRADS, Korean TIRADS, and American Thyroid Association guidelines for risk stratification of thyroid nodules: a prospective study
    Mohammad Behbahaninia
    Mehrdad Nabahati
    Zoleikha Moazezi
    Rahele Mehraeen
    Hoda Shirafkan
    Journal of Ultrasound, 2022, 25 : 887 - 894
  • [8] Diagnostic performance of ACR-TIRADS, Korean TIRADS, and American Thyroid Association guidelines for risk stratification of thyroid nodules: a prospective study
    Behbahaninia, Mohammad
    Nabahati, Mehrdad
    Moazezi, Zoleikha
    Mehraeen, Rahele
    Shirafkan, Hoda
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND, 2022, 25 (04) : 887 - 894
  • [9] Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound Patterns by K-TIRADS and 2015 ATA Guidelines in Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules and Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance
    Hong, Hyun Sook
    Lee, Ji Ye
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (02) : 444 - 450
  • [10] 2020 Chinese guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: the C-TIRADS
    Zhou, JianQiao
    Yin, LiXue
    Wei, Xi
    Zhang, Sheng
    Song, YanYan
    Luo, BaoMing
    Li, JianChu
    Qian, LinXue
    Cui, LiGang
    Chen, Wen
    Wen, ChaoYang
    Peng, YuLan
    Chen, Qin
    Lu, Man
    Chen, Min
    Wu, Rong
    Zhou, Wei
    Xue, EnSheng
    Li, YingJia
    Yang, LiChun
    Mi, ChengRong
    Zhang, RuiFang
    Wu, Gang
    Du, GuoQing
    Huang, DaoZhong
    Zhan, WeiWei
    ENDOCRINE, 2020, 70 (02) : 256 - 279