Environmental impact of milk and electricity production from dairy farms with biogas plants of different size and feeding system

被引:3
|
作者
Fusi, Mara [1 ]
Pirlo, Giacomo [1 ]
机构
[1] Council Agr Res & Econ, Res Ctr Anim Prod & Aquaculture, CREA, Via Antonio Lombardo 11, I-26900 Lodi, Italy
关键词
Life cycle assessment; System expansion; Milk; Electricity; Anaerobic digestion; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENERGY CROPS; EFFICIENCY; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135445
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion is an effective method to decrease the environmental impact of milk production and to generate renewable energy. A dairy farm with an annexed biogas plant produces three outputs, milk, meat and electricity, and should be considered as a single system for the evaluation of the environmental impact. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent the size and feeding methods of the biogas plants in three dairy farms with different features affect the environmental impact related to the milk and electricity produced. The first farm was characterized by a biogas plant of 300 kW fed only with cattle manure, the second farm had a plant of 526 kW fed with cattle manure, maize silage and waste of maize grain production, while the third farm had a biogas plant of 999 kW fed with cattle and poultry manure, maize and triticale silage, and fats from slaugh-terhouse waste. The Life Cycle Assessment involved the environmental impact of Fat Protein Corrected Milk (FPCM), in the first instance with meat and electricity from biogas considered with an economic allocation, and then considered a credit. Successively, the environmental consequences of electricity were evaluated considering milk and meat as credits. With the economic allocation, Carbon Footprint (CFP) of one kg of FPCM was 0.82, 0.85 and 0.72 kg CO2 eq in the first, second and third farm, respectively. In all the three farms, electricity generation from biogas determined a reduction in the environmental impact of milk production thanks to a credit of emissions provided by the production of renewable energy. Milk CFP in the three farms was 0.82, 0.91 and 0.13 kg CO2 eq respectively, with mitigation from biogas of 11%, 11% and 85%. The best performances were obtained in the third farm thanks to higher levels of electricity generation, covered digestate storage and the large use of agri-industrial waste. Electricity CFP in the farms was-0.74,-0.68 and-0.06 kg CO2 eq/kWh respectively. Environmental consequences of electricity production from biogas plants were compensated in all the farms thanks to the credits provided by milk; this compensation was as greater as the ratio between milk and electricity production and the first farm reached better outcomes. In the context of reducing the environmental impact of animal foods and implementing an ecological transition to reach national and European goals for renewable energy production, the work could be beneficial to assess which combination between dairy and energy products should be promoted.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Feeding System Effects on Dairy Cow Rumen Function and Milk Production
    McAuliffe, Stephen
    Mee, John F.
    Lewis, Eva
    Galvin, Norann
    Hennessy, Deirdre
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [22] Impact of cow feeding system on the composition and quality of milk and dairy products
    O'Callaghan, T. F.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 : 387 - 387
  • [23] The Impact of Agri-Environmental Policies and Production Intensification on the Environmental Performance of Dutch Dairy Farms
    Skevas, Ioannis
    Zhu, Xueqin
    Shestalova, Victoria
    Emvalomatis, Grigorios
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2018, 43 (03) : 423 - 440
  • [24] Milk production responses to different strategies for feeding supplements to grazing dairy cows
    Auldist, M. J.
    Marett, L. C.
    Greenwood, J. S.
    Wright, M. M.
    Hannah, M.
    Jacobs, J. L.
    Wales, W. J.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (01) : 657 - 671
  • [25] Management options to reduce the environmental impact of dairy goat milk production
    Zucali, Maddalena
    Lovarelli, Daniela
    Celozzi, Stefania
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Sandrucci, Anna
    Bava, Luciana
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2020, 231
  • [26] The impact of biogas production on the organic carbon input to the soil of Dutch dairy farms: A substance flow analysis
    Dieu Linh Hoang
    Wiersema, Brienne
    Moll, Henri C.
    Nonhebel, Sanderine
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2022, 26 (02) : 491 - 508
  • [27] Effect of feeding oat and vetch forages on milk production and quality in smallholder dairy farms in Central Kenya
    Mwendia, Solomon W.
    Mwungu, Chris M.
    Ng'ang'a, Stanley Karanja
    Njenga, David
    Notenbaert, An
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2018, 50 (05) : 1051 - 1057
  • [28] Effect of feeding oat and vetch forages on milk production and quality in smallholder dairy farms in Central Kenya
    Solomon W. Mwendia
    Chris M. Mwungu
    Stanley Karanja Ng’ang’a
    David Njenga
    An Notenbaert
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2018, 50 : 1051 - 1057
  • [29] Feeding Grazing Dairy Cows With Different Energy Sources on Recovery of Human-Edible Nutrients in Milk and Environmental Impact
    Batistel, Fernanda
    de Souza, Jonas
    Vaz Pires, Alexandre
    Santos, Flavio Augusto Portela
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2021, 5
  • [30] Biogas production from small-scale anaerobic digestion plants on European farms
    O'Connor, S.
    Ehimen, E.
    Pillai, S. C.
    Black, A.
    Tormey, D.
    Bartlett, J.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 139 (139):