Setting 'green' boundaries for Chinese green finance: Multi-level governance and regulatory stringency

被引:0
|
作者
Cheng, Wenting [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Kai [2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Law, Acton, ACT, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Asia & Pacific, Acton, ACT, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Law, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
green bonds; green finance; green projects; multi-level governance (MLG); regulatory stringency; CLIMATE; POLICY; COPRODUCTION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1002/eet.2066
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article focuses on setting 'green' boundaries for green finance in China-the scope of eligible 'green' projects to be supported by Chinese green finance. China started building its green finance system in 2015, and 23 provinces issued guidelines on green finance between 2016 and 2020. Applying multi-level governance as our analytical framework, this study collects data from a broad range of publicly available sources, including 64 policies issued by Chinese state ministries, provinces or pilot zones, transcripts of relevant press conferences, and streamed speeches given by relevant stakeholders in online workshops. We explain who governs the 'green' boundary of Chinese green finance, how it is governed, and the implication for regulatory stringency. We identify three levels of regulators involved in setting green boundaries-central ministries through the horizontal allocation of overlapping mandates, provinces through vague references and priority lists, and green finance pilot zones through vertical knowledge co-production. We argue that continuous multi-level negotiation and coordination dynamics determine the 'green' boundary in Chinese green finance, which further influences regulatory stringency. While several provinces and a pilot zone did temporarily prioritise industries with local competitive advantages (as exemplified by clean coal) as eligible to be supported by green bonds, the central government disapproved of such practices by its strong coordinating authority. The regulatory stringency was also safeguarded by the influence of transnational networks and China's decarbonisation objectives.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 192
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Has green finance reform promoted green growth in Chinese industry?
    Su, Yichen
    Cheng, Zhonghua
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (22) : 63136 - 63147
  • [32] MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE OF HYDROPOWER IN CHINA? THE PROBLEM OF TRANSPLANTING A WESTERN CONCEPT INTO THE CHINESE GOVERNANCE CONTEXT
    Hensengerth, Oliver
    MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE: THE MISSING LINKAGES, 2015, 4 : 295 - 320
  • [33] Has green finance reform promoted green growth in Chinese industry?
    Yichen Su
    Zhonghua Cheng
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 63136 - 63147
  • [34] Environmental regulatory intensity, green finance and corporate green sustainable development performance
    Xu, Xinpeng
    Wang, Shengxian
    Li, Jinyu
    Qiao, Tai
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (09)
  • [35] Incentive mechanism design for promoting high-quality green buildings in China's multi-level governance system
    Hu, Qidan
    Xiong, Feng
    Shen, Geoffrey Qiping
    Liu, Rongsheng
    Xue, Jin
    Wu, Hengqin
    Zhou, Xin
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 269
  • [36] Multi-level governance of forest resources
    Mwangi, Esther
    Wardell, Andrew
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS, 2012, 6 (02): : 79 - 103
  • [37] Multi-level Governance and European Integration
    Loughlin, John
    EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 7 (04) : 472 - 482
  • [38] Multi-level governance in a 'Europe with the regions'
    Schakel, Arjan H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2020, 22 (04): : 767 - 775
  • [39] Europeanization and multi-level governance in Slovenia
    Andreou, George
    Bache, Ian
    SOUTHEAST EUROPEAN AND BLACK SEA STUDIES, 2010, 10 (01) : 29 - 43
  • [40] Shipping, policy and multi-level governance
    Roe M.
    Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2007, 9 (1) : 84 - 103