Setting 'green' boundaries for Chinese green finance: Multi-level governance and regulatory stringency

被引:0
|
作者
Cheng, Wenting [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Kai [2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Law, Acton, ACT, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Asia & Pacific, Acton, ACT, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Law, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
green bonds; green finance; green projects; multi-level governance (MLG); regulatory stringency; CLIMATE; POLICY; COPRODUCTION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1002/eet.2066
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article focuses on setting 'green' boundaries for green finance in China-the scope of eligible 'green' projects to be supported by Chinese green finance. China started building its green finance system in 2015, and 23 provinces issued guidelines on green finance between 2016 and 2020. Applying multi-level governance as our analytical framework, this study collects data from a broad range of publicly available sources, including 64 policies issued by Chinese state ministries, provinces or pilot zones, transcripts of relevant press conferences, and streamed speeches given by relevant stakeholders in online workshops. We explain who governs the 'green' boundary of Chinese green finance, how it is governed, and the implication for regulatory stringency. We identify three levels of regulators involved in setting green boundaries-central ministries through the horizontal allocation of overlapping mandates, provinces through vague references and priority lists, and green finance pilot zones through vertical knowledge co-production. We argue that continuous multi-level negotiation and coordination dynamics determine the 'green' boundary in Chinese green finance, which further influences regulatory stringency. While several provinces and a pilot zone did temporarily prioritise industries with local competitive advantages (as exemplified by clean coal) as eligible to be supported by green bonds, the central government disapproved of such practices by its strong coordinating authority. The regulatory stringency was also safeguarded by the influence of transnational networks and China's decarbonisation objectives.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 192
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ocean Governance in the Coral Triangle: A Multi-Level Regulatory Governance Structure
    Heck, Sarah A.
    POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2022, 10 (03): : 70 - 79
  • [2] From ideal to reality: governance of AMR in a multi-level setting
    Time, Martin Stangborli
    Veggeland, Frode
    JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2024, 31 (12) : 4063 - 4087
  • [3] Green Corporate Governance, Green Finance, and Sustainable Performance Nexus in Chinese SMES: A Mediation Moderation Model
    Wang, Lei
    Ur Rehman, Amin
    Xu, Zhaocheng
    Amjad, Fiza
    Ur Rehman, Shams
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [4] Multi-level Governance
    Pearce, Graham
    REGIONAL AND FEDERAL STUDIES, 2005, 15 (01): : 129 - 130
  • [5] Multi-level governance
    Bovaird, T
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2005, 83 (04) : 966 - 969
  • [6] Multi-level governance
    James, O
    WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2005, 28 (03) : 687 - 689
  • [7] A multi-level programming model for green supplier selection
    Gupta, Srikant
    Chatterjee, Prasenjit
    Yazdani, Morteza
    Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto D. R.
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2021, 59 (10) : 2496 - 2527
  • [8] Green finance and environmental, social, and governance: evidence from Chinese listed companies
    Wu, Jing
    Liew, Chee Yoong
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (51) : 110499 - 110514
  • [9] Green finance and environmental, social, and governance: evidence from Chinese listed companies
    Jing Wu
    Chee Yoong Liew
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 110499 - 110514
  • [10] Promoting green buildings in China's multi-level governance system: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis
    Hu, Qidan
    Xiong, Feng
    Shen, Geoffrey Qiping
    Liu, Rongsheng
    Wu, Hengqin
    Xue, Jin
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 242