Professional responses to sibling sexual abuse

被引:2
|
作者
King-Hill, Sophie [1 ,4 ]
Gilsenan, Abby [2 ]
McCartan, Kieran [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Hlth Serv Management Ctr, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Social Policy, Birmingham, England
[3] Univ West England, Dept Hlth & Social Sci, Bristol, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, HSMC, Pk House, Birmingham B15 2RT, England
关键词
Sibling sexual abuse; sexual violence; professional practice; intra-familial abuse; harmful sexual behaviour; intervention; OFFENDERS; CHILD;
D O I
10.1080/13552600.2023.2241482
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Professional confidence and knowledge are essential in effectively responding to sibling sexual abuse (SSA). If professionals do not have knowledge of the area and confidence in their skills to deliver effective support, then there could be negative consequences for the victims. The methods consisted of narrative interviewing of N = 30 professionals and N = 2 young victims/survivors. This approach was chosen as it provided a thorough and robust picture of practitioner responses to SSA. Through thematic analysis, three dominant themes emerged across both the young person and practitioner data in relation to practitioner responses to SSA, these being minimisation, exaggeration, and catastrophising. SSA is an area in its own right with its own nuances and considerations that make it distinct from other forms of sexual abuse, which means that professional responses and training need to be re-examined to develop new, more appropriate ways of working with victims as well as those who commit SSA.PRACTICE IMPACT STATEMENTThe impact of this paper is both clinical and professional. It gives insight into a little-researched area and highlights the complex issues in relation to sibling sexual abuse and how this is framed and approached by professionals. This points to the critical need for more work and training in this area when working with SSA and the need for more bespoke professional knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 373
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Disclosure of Sibling Sexual Abuse by Hospitalized Adolescent Girls: Three Case Reports
    Carretier, Emilie
    Lachal, Jonathan
    Franzoni, Nina
    Guessoum, Selim Benjamin
    Moro, Marie Rose
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 12
  • [42] "Mend the rift" therapeutic model for working with sibling sexual abuse: Professionals' perspectives
    Marmor, Amitai
    Weisrose, Efrat Lusky
    Kimelman, Yael Bleich
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2025, 162
  • [43] Themes of Adult Sibling Sexual Abuse Survivors in Later Life: An Initial Exploration
    Kathleen Monahan
    Clinical Social Work Journal, 2010, 38 : 361 - 369
  • [44] "Just listen to me": Experiences of therapy after childhood sibling sexual abuse
    van Berkel, Sheila R.
    Bicanic, Iva A. E.
    van der Voort, Anja
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2025, 162
  • [45] Themes of Adult Sibling Sexual Abuse Survivors in Later Life: An Initial Exploration
    Monahan, Kathleen
    CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL, 2010, 38 (04) : 361 - 369
  • [46] Child sexual abuse: The final report of the Australian Royal Commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse
    Peters, Michael A.
    EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY, 2019, 51 (03) : 233 - 238
  • [47] THE PROFESSIONAL RESPONSE TO CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE - WHOSE INTERESTS ARE SERVED
    FINCHAM, FD
    BEACH, SRH
    MOORE, T
    DIENER, C
    FAMILY RELATIONS, 1994, 43 (03) : 244 - 254
  • [48] Training professional psychologists to treat survivors of childhood sexual abuse
    Gold, SN
    PSYCHOTHERAPY, 1997, 34 (04) : 365 - 374
  • [49] Introduction to the Child Abuse & Neglect Special Issue: "Sibling sexual abuse: Broken from a (supposedly) unbreakable bond"
    Talmon, Anat
    Marmor, Amitai
    Tener, Dafna
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2025, 162
  • [50] ILLINOIS SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY PREDOCTORAL MINOR IN SEXUAL ABUSE
    LEIFER, M
    CAIRNS, NU
    CONNERS, ME
    LAWRENCE, MM
    GRUENHUT, P
    WOMACK, A
    EVANS, HL
    DOWNING, DL
    PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1995, 26 (03) : 252 - 256