A Bayesian framework for uncertainty quantification of perturbed gamma process based on simulated likelihood

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Long [1 ]
Huang, Tianli [1 ]
Zhou, Hao [1 ]
Chen, Huapeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Changsha 410075, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] East China Jiaotong Univ, Sch Transportat Engn, Nanchang 330013, Peoples R China
关键词
Stochastic degradation modeling; Perturbed gamma process; Simulated likelihood; Posterior inference; Model selection; Adaptive PMCMC; Bayes factor; MODELS; PREDICTION; TUTORIAL; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.probengmech.2023.103444
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The perturbed gamma process (PGP) has recently been widely used in modeling the noisy degradation data collected from engineering structures and components since it can simultaneously consider the temporal variability of degradation and measurement uncertainty. As a result of the sampling and inspection uncertainty in engineering practice, it is necessary to account for the resulting parameter uncertainty. Meanwhile, the flexibility of the form of measurement error motivates a potential demand for quantifying the model uncertainty and selecting the most fitting error model for the given inspection data. The Bayesian approach is well-suited to quantity the parameter uncertainty induced by imperfect inspection and limited inspection data, but its practical implementation is extremely challenging due to the intractable likelihood function of PGP. In the paper, a novel Bayesian framework for quantifying parameter and model uncertainty of PGP is presented, where the simulated likelihood that is an unbiased estimator generated by Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) is introduced to overcome the intractable likelihood of PGP. More specifically, an Adaptive Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo (APMCMC) is proposed to perform the Bayesian sampling from the posterior distributions of parameters, achieving the requirement for the quantification of parameter uncertainty. By utilizing the posterior samples from APMCMC, a model selection method based on the Bayes factor is employed to determine the most fitting one from some alternative error models. Finally, two simulation examples are presented to illustrate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed framework and its applicability is confirmed by a practical case involving the corrosion modeling of a group of pipelines.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Inverse uncertainty quantification using the modular Bayesian approach based on Gaussian process, Part 1: Theory
    Wu, Xu
    Kozlowski, Tomasz
    Meidani, Hadi
    Shirvan, Koroush
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2018, 335 : 339 - 355
  • [22] Uncertainty quantification and propagation in surrogate-based Bayesian inference
    Reiser, Philipp
    Aguilar, Javier Enrique
    Guthke, Anneli
    Buerkner, Paul-Christian
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2025, 35 (03)
  • [23] Exploiting Task-Based Parallelism in Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification
    Hadjidoukas, Panagiotis E.
    Angelikopoulos, Panagiotis
    Kulakova, Lina
    Papadimitriou, Costas
    Koumoutsakos, Petros
    EURO-PAR 2015: PARALLEL PROCESSING, 2015, 9233 : 532 - 544
  • [24] Copula-based Bayesian uncertainty quantification framework of SST turbulence model for flow over a Gaussian bump
    Li, Yao
    Zhang, Jin-rong
    Wu, Wan -tong
    Jiang, Zhen-hua
    Tang, Deng-gao
    Yan, Chao
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2024, 216 : 229 - 245
  • [25] Batch simulations and uncertainty quantification in Gaussian process surrogate approximate Bayesian computation
    Jarvenpaa, Marko
    Vehtari, Aki
    Marttinen, Pekka
    CONFERENCE ON UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (UAI 2020), 2020, 124 : 779 - 788
  • [26] Quantification and incorporation of uncertainty in forest growth and yield projections using a bayesian probabilistic framework
    Wilson, Duncan
    Monleon, Vicente
    Weiskittel, Aaron
    Mathematical and Computational Forestry and Natural-Resource Sciences, 2019, 11 (02): : 264 - 285
  • [27] A comprehensive Bayesian framework for the development, validation and uncertainty quantification of thermal-hydraulic models
    Cocci, Riccardo
    Damblin, Guillaume
    Ghione, Alberto
    Sargentini, Lucia
    Lucor, Didier
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2022, 172
  • [28] Bayesian uncertainty quantification and propagation in molecular dynamics simulations: A high performance computing framework
    Angelikopoulos, Panagiotis
    Papadimitriou, Costas
    Koumoutsakos, Petros
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 137 (14):
  • [29] Prediction using numerical simulations, a Bayesian framework for uncertainty quantification and its statistical challenge
    Glimm, J
    Lee, Y
    Ye, KQ
    Sharp, DH
    ISUMA 2003: FOURTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON UNCERTAINTY MODELING AND ANALYSIS, 2003, : 380 - 385
  • [30] Inverse uncertainty quantification using the modular Bayesian approach based on Gaussian Process, Part 2: Application to TRACE
    Wu, Xu
    Kozlowski, Tomasz
    Meidani, Hadi
    Shirvan, Koroush
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2018, 335 : 417 - 431