Making Australian institutions in newspaper coverage of the #MeToo movement: exceptionalism, co-production and agency

被引:2
|
作者
Seear, Kate [1 ]
Fraser, Suzanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Res Ctr Sex Hlth & Soc, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
关键词
#MeToo; media; institutions; exceptionalism; Australia; ME;
D O I
10.1080/14680777.2021.2010788
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
In Australia, the rise of the #MeToo movement coincided with a major public reckoning with sexual and family violence, through two royal commissions. Across #MeToo and the royal commissions, a common picture emerged whereby the mutually reinforcing role of institutions such as the media and law was considered central to the production of problems such as sexual assault. Drawing on insights from feminist science and technology studies on the constitution of realities, this paper examines how the role of institutions has been constructed in public debate since, through an analysis of Australian newspaper accounts of #MeToo from 2017-2020. Some accounts materialise #MeToo problems as the product of mutually reinforcing institutional dynamics. More commonly, these problems are constituted as the product of "institutional exceptionalism": rare features of particular institutions, not commonly replicated. We consider the implications of these media constructions.
引用
收藏
页码:836 / 851
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Co-created decision-making: From co-production to value co-creation in health care
    Amorim, Jason
    Ventura, Andrea Cardoso
    JOURNAL OF MEDICINE ACCESS, 2023, 7
  • [32] Knowledge co-production with social movement networks. Redefining grassroots politics, rethinking research
    Lozano, Alberto Arribas
    SOCIAL MOVEMENT STUDIES, 2018, 17 (04) : 451 - 463
  • [33] The opportunity and challenge of trust and decision-making uncertainty Managing co-production in value co-creation
    Wu, Li-Wei
    Wang, Chung-Yu
    Rouyer, Ellen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BANK MARKETING, 2020, 38 (01) : 199 - 218
  • [34] Knowledge co-production for decision-making in human-natural systems under uncertainty
    Moallemi, Enayat A.
    Zare, Fateme
    Hebinck, Aniek
    Szetey, Katrina
    Molina-Perez, Edmundo
    Zyngier, Romy L.
    Hadjikakou, Michalis
    Kwakkel, Jan
    Haasnoot, Marjolijn
    Miller, Kelly K.
    Groves, David G.
    Leith, Peat
    Bryan, Brett A.
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2023, 82
  • [35] Raising relational legal consciousness through co-production research? Making law more accessible
    Harding, Rosie
    Keeling, Amanda
    JOURNAL OF LAW AND SOCIETY, 2024,
  • [36] Co-Production and Health System Reform - From Re-Imagining To Re-Making
    Dunston, Roger
    Lee, Alison
    Boud, David
    Brodie, Pat
    Chiarella, Mary
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2009, 68 (01) : 39 - 52
  • [37] The learning space of the service firm and elements in the co-production of knowledge: Evidence from Australian service firms
    Martinez-Fernandez, MC
    Soosay, CA
    Tremayne, K
    PEOPLE, KNOWLEDGE AND TECHNOLOGY: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNT SO FAR?, 2004, : 394 - 395
  • [38] Achievements and challenges of innovation co-production support initiatives in the Australian and Dutch dairy sectors: A comparative study
    Klerkx, Laurens
    Nettle, Ruth
    FOOD POLICY, 2013, 40 : 74 - 89
  • [39] Queer Asian Australian migration: creative film co-production and diasporic intimacy in The Home Song Stories
    Yue, Audrey
    STUDIES IN AUSTRALASIAN CINEMA, 2008, 2 (03) : 229 - 243
  • [40] New development: Institutions, 'new civic leadership' and being 'truly civic'-some tensions in co-production debates
    Harrow, Jenny
    Guest, Matthew
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 41 (05) : 417 - 421