Making Australian institutions in newspaper coverage of the #MeToo movement: exceptionalism, co-production and agency

被引:2
|
作者
Seear, Kate [1 ]
Fraser, Suzanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Res Ctr Sex Hlth & Soc, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
关键词
#MeToo; media; institutions; exceptionalism; Australia; ME;
D O I
10.1080/14680777.2021.2010788
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
In Australia, the rise of the #MeToo movement coincided with a major public reckoning with sexual and family violence, through two royal commissions. Across #MeToo and the royal commissions, a common picture emerged whereby the mutually reinforcing role of institutions such as the media and law was considered central to the production of problems such as sexual assault. Drawing on insights from feminist science and technology studies on the constitution of realities, this paper examines how the role of institutions has been constructed in public debate since, through an analysis of Australian newspaper accounts of #MeToo from 2017-2020. Some accounts materialise #MeToo problems as the product of mutually reinforcing institutional dynamics. More commonly, these problems are constituted as the product of "institutional exceptionalism": rare features of particular institutions, not commonly replicated. We consider the implications of these media constructions.
引用
收藏
页码:836 / 851
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reflections on Making Co-production Work: The Reality of Co-production from an Insider Perspective
    Fillingham, Joy
    Smith, Julia
    Sealey, Clive
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2023, 53 (03): : 1593 - 1601
  • [2] Industry, co-production and agency: Gina Lollobrigida in documents
    Small, Pauline
    ITALIANIST, 2012, 32 (02): : 191 - 213
  • [3] The making of a node: a co-production of neurons and glia
    Eshed-Eisenbach, Yael
    Peles, Elior
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (06) : 1049 - 1056
  • [4] Making a good impression - Peace movement press release styles and newspaper coverage
    Levin, D
    HARVARD INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESS-POLITICS, 2002, 7 (01): : 79 - 101
  • [6] Making sense of the digital co-production of welfare services: using digital technology to simplify or tailor the co-production of services
    Larsson, Karl Kristian
    Skjolsvik, Tale
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2023, 25 (06) : 1169 - 1186
  • [7] From compliance to co-production: Emergent forms of agency in Sustainable Wine Production in New Zealand
    Rosin, Christopher J.
    Legun, Katharine A.
    Campbell, Hugh
    Sautier, Marion
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2017, 49 (12): : 2780 - 2799
  • [8] Inside the politics of technology: Agency and normativity in the co-production of technology and society.
    Dobres, Marcia-Anne
    TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE, 2007, 48 (01) : 179 - 181
  • [9] Stepping back from the gate: Online newspaper editors and the co-production of content in campaign 2004
    Singer, Jane B.
    JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2006, 83 (02) : 265 - 280
  • [10] Stakeholder engagement in the co-production of knowledge for environmental decision-making
    Gerlak, Andrea K.
    Guido, Zack
    Owen, Gigi
    McGoffin, Mariana Sofia Rodriguez
    Louder, Elena
    Davies, Julia
    Smith, Kelly Jay
    Zimmer, Andy
    Murveit, Anna M.
    Meadow, Alison
    Shrestha, Padmendra
    Joshi, Nupur
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 170