Towards a multidimensional measure of well-being: cross-cultural support through the Italian validation of the well-being profile

被引:2
|
作者
Scalas, L. Francesca [1 ]
Lodi, Ernesto [2 ]
Magnano, Paola [3 ]
Marsh, Herbert W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cagliari, Dipartimento Pedag Psicol Filosofia, Via Is Mirrionis,1 Cagliari Loc Sa Duchessa, I-09123 Cagliari, Italy
[2] Univ Sassari, Sassari, Italy
[3] Univ Enna Kore, Enna, Italy
[4] Australian Catholic Univ, Sydney, Australia
关键词
Multidimensional well-being scale; Well-being profile; Italian validation; Factor analysis; Bifactor analysis; MENTAL-HEALTH; FIT INDEXES; NEED SATISFACTION; COMMUNITY; SENSE; FRUSTRATION; EUDAIMONIA; HAPPINESS; WORK;
D O I
10.1186/s40359-023-01485-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe Well-being Profile (WB-Pro) is a multi-item and multidimensional instrument with strong psychometric properties and a solid theoretical grounding. It includes aspects of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being that can be used at the individual and social levels.MethodWe developed the Italian version through back-translation procedures. The aim of this study is to validate the WB-Pro in Italian as well as to better understand its multidimensionality through bifactor analysis. A sample of 1451 participants (910 = women, 62.7%; age range: 18-70, M-age = 32.34, SD-age = 13.64) was involved.ResultsThe 15-factor structure was confirmed with CFA and ESEM and was invariant across gender, age, and education. We examined convergent and discriminant validity and a bifactorial representation. Short versions of the WB-Pro were tested.DiscussionEven though a few items of the Italian version of the WB-Pro might benefit from revision (e.g., clear-thinking scale), this study confirms the theoretical and empirical strength of the WB-Pro.ConclusionsThis study supports the WB-Pro validity and usefulness in studying well-being and for professional psychological applications to assess well-being in both individuals and groups.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cross-cultural differences on Gunas and other well-being dimensions
    Singh, Kamlesh
    Jain, Anjali
    Kaur, Jasleen
    Junnarkar, Mohita
    Slezackova, Alena
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 24 : 139 - 146
  • [32] Positive psychology and the study of well-being: Cross-cultural challenges
    Delle Fave, Antonella
    Cheung, Fanny
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 47 : 618 - 618
  • [33] Cross-cultural differences in subjective well-being: Mexico and Spain
    Carballeira, Monica
    Gonzalez, Jose-Angel
    Marrero, Rosario J.
    ANALES DE PSICOLOGIA, 2015, 31 (01): : 199 - 206
  • [34] Development and Initial Validation of a Multidimensional Scale Assessing Subjective Well-Being: The Well-Being Scale (WeBS)
    Lui, P. Priscilla
    Fernando, Gaithri A.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2018, 121 (01) : 135 - 160
  • [35] Inequality and multidimensional well-being
    McGillivray, M
    Shorrocks, A
    REVIEW OF INCOME AND WEALTH, 2005, (02) : 193 - 199
  • [36] Measuring Well-being: A Multidimensional Index Integrating Subjective Well-being and Preferences
    Yang, Lin
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND CAPABILITIES, 2018, 19 (04) : 456 - 476
  • [37] Validation for Multidimensional Measure of Reentry Well-Being Among Individuals Who Are Incarcerated
    Veeh, Christopher A.
    Renn, Tanya
    Pettus, Carrie
    Petscher, Yaacov
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2024, 34 (01) : 98 - 122
  • [38] The Well-Being Profile (WB-Pro): Creating a Theoretically Based Multidimensional Measure of Well-Being to Advance Theory, Research, Policy, and Practice
    Marsh, Herbert W.
    Huppert, Felicia A.
    Donald, James N.
    Horwood, Marcus S.
    Sahdra, Baljinder K.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2020, 32 (03) : 294 - 313
  • [39] Subjective well-being is essential to well-being
    Diener, E
    Sapyta, JJ
    Suh, E
    PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 1998, 9 (01) : 33 - 37
  • [40] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING - COMPONENTS OF WELL-BEING
    GLATZER, W
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1987, 19 (01) : 25 - 31