Risk prediction models in emergency surgery: Protocol for a scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Hansted, Anna K. [1 ,6 ]
Moller, Morten H. [2 ,3 ]
Moller, Ann M. [1 ,3 ]
Burcharth, Jakob [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Thorup, Sofie S. [1 ]
Vester-Andersen, Morten [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Herlev Gentofte, Herlev Anaesthesia Crit & Emergency Care Sci Unit, ACES,Herlev Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Herlev, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshospitalet, Dept Intens Care 4131, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Herlev & Gentofte, Dept Gastrointestinal & Hepat Dis, Herlev, Denmark
[5] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Herlev & Gentofte, Emergency Surg Res Grp Copenhagen EMERGE Cph, Herlev, Denmark
[6] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Herlev Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Herlev Anaesthesia Crit & Emergency Care Sci Unit, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
关键词
emergency surgery; perioperative; risk; risk prediction; risk stratification; ASSESSMENT TOOLS; MORTALITY; VALIDATION; DERIVATION;
D O I
10.1111/aas.14383
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Risk prediction models are used for many purposes in emergency surgery, including critical care triage and benchmarking. Several risk prediction models have been developed, and some are used for purposes other than those for which they were developed. We aim to provide an overview of the existing literature on risk prediction models used in emergency surgery and highlight knowledge gaps. Methods: We will conduct a scoping review on risk prediction models used for patients undergoing emergency surgery in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will search Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library and include all study designs. We aim to answer the following questions: (1) What risk prediction models are used in emergency surgery? (2) Which variables are used in these models? (3) Which surgical specialties are the models used for? (4) Have the models been externally validated? (5) Where have the models been externally validated? (6) What purposes were the models developed for? (7) What are the strengths and limitations of the included models? We will summarize the results descriptively. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Conclusion: The outlined scoping review will summarize the existing literature on risk prediction models used in emergency surgery and highlight knowledge gaps.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 581
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Emergency medical services and palliative care: protocol for a scoping review
    Gage, Caleb Hanson
    Stander, Charnelle
    Gwyther, Liz
    Stassen, Willem
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [22] Implementation strategies in emergency management of children: a scoping review protocol
    Alex Aregbesola
    Ahmed M. Abou-Setta
    Maya M. Jeyaraman
    George Okoli
    Otto Lam
    Kathryn M. Sibley
    Terry P. Klassen
    Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [23] Predictive models of diabetes complications: protocol for a scoping review
    Ndjaboue, Ruth
    Farhat, Imen
    Ferlatte, Carol-Ann
    Ngueta, Gerard
    Guay, Daniel
    Delorme, Sasha
    Ivers, Noah
    Shah, Baiju R.
    Straus, Sharon
    Yu, Catherine
    Witteman, Holly O.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [24] Forecasting models for leprosy cases: a scoping review protocol
    Ascef, Bruna Oliveira
    Araujo de Oliveira, Gustavo Laine
    Filha Coriolano, Carmelita Ribeiro
    De Oliveira Junior, Haliton Alves
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [25] Predictive models of diabetes complications: protocol for a scoping review
    Ruth Ndjaboue
    Imen Farhat
    Carol-Ann Ferlatte
    Gérard Ngueta
    Daniel Guay
    Sasha Delorme
    Noah Ivers
    Baiju R. Shah
    Sharon Straus
    Catherine Yu
    Holly O. Witteman
    Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [26] Risk prediction models to determine maternal and newborn adverse pregnancy outcomes in low and middle-income countries: A scoping review protocol
    Opoku, Douglas Aninng
    Agyei-Baffour, Peter
    Gyaase, Stephaney
    Odei-Lartey, Eliezer
    Osarfo, Joseph
    Gmanyanmi, Jonathan
    Appiah, Francis
    Adjei, George
    Enuameh, Yeetey
    PLOS ONE, 2025, 20 (03):
  • [27] Risk perception among healthcare professionals working in emergency care in remote locations: a scoping review protocol
    Queiros, Celia Maria
    Martins, Teresa
    Correia, Tiago
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [28] Implementation of prediction models in the emergency department from an implementation science perspective-Determinants, outcomes and real-world impact: A scoping review protocol
    Chan, Sze Ling
    Lee, Jin Wee
    Ong, Marcus Eng Hock
    Siddiqui, Fahad Javaid
    Graves, Nicholas
    Ho, Andrew Fu Wah
    Liu, Nan
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (05):
  • [29] Emergency physician risk of occupational mortality: A scoping review
    Goolsby, Craig
    Lala, Vidya
    Gebner, Riley
    Dacuyan-Faucher, Nicole
    Charlton, Nathan
    Schuler, Keke
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS OPEN, 2021, 2 (05)
  • [30] A Scoping Review of Emergency Department Discharge Risk Stratification
    Jaffe, Todd A.
    Wang, Daniel
    Loveless, Bosten
    Lai, Debbie
    Loesche, Michael
    White, Benjamin
    Raja, Ali S.
    He, Shuhan
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (06) : 1218 - 1226