It is causal: revisiting the savings and investment nexus
被引:0
|
作者:
David, Antonio C.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Int Monetary Fund, African Dept, Washington, DC USAInt Monetary Fund, African Dept, Washington, DC USA
David, Antonio C.
[1
]
Goncalves, Carlos Eduardo
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Int Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Dept, Washington, DC USA
Int Monetary Fund, Fiscal AffairsDept, 1900 Penn Ave,HQ2, Washington, DC 20431 USAInt Monetary Fund, African Dept, Washington, DC USA
Goncalves, Carlos Eduardo
[2
,5
]
Werner, Alejandro
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC USA
Peterson Inst, Washington, DC USAInt Monetary Fund, African Dept, Washington, DC USA
Werner, Alejandro
[3
,4
]
机构:
[1] Int Monetary Fund, African Dept, Washington, DC USA
[2] Int Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Dept, Washington, DC USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC USA
[4] Peterson Inst, Washington, DC USA
[5] Int Monetary Fund, Fiscal AffairsDept, 1900 Penn Ave,HQ2, Washington, DC 20431 USA
Investment;
savings;
causality;
CAPITAL MOBILITY;
GROWTH;
INSTRUMENTS;
D O I:
10.1080/00036846.2023.2165616
中图分类号:
F [经济];
学科分类号:
02 ;
摘要:
Domestic savings and investment are positively correlated across countries and through time, as first suggested by Feldstein and Horioka (1980). However, whether this long-lasting correlation implies causation is still an open question. In this paper, we use instrumental variables in a panel setting and show that domestic savings do cause investment in developing economies. In contrast, for advanced countries the statistically significant correlation found in the data seems to result from endogeneity bias. Our identification strategy relies on the idea that age structure influences savings, but not total investment directly. Time-series data patterns for the United States and the theory of Direct Technological Change lend credence to our exclusion restriction.