Treatment of Demodex Blepharitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Masked Clinical Trial Comparing Topical Lotilaner Ophthalmic Solution, 0.25% Eyedrops to Vehicle

被引:12
|
作者
Yeu, Elizabeth [1 ]
Holdbrook, Mark [2 ]
Baba, Stephanie N. [2 ]
Ceballos, Juan Carlos [3 ]
Massaro-Corredor, Martha [3 ]
Corredor-Ortega, Claudia [3 ]
Ramos-Betancourt, Nallely [4 ]
Quiroz-Mercado, Hugo [5 ]
Gonzalez-Salinas, Roberto [3 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Eye Consultants, 241 Corp Blvd,Suite 210, Norfolk, VA 23502 USA
[2] Tarsus Pharmaceut Inc, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Asociac Evitar Ceguera Mexico IAP, Anterior Segment Surg Dept, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[4] Asociac Evitar Ceguera Mexico IAP, Cornea Dept, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[5] Asociac Evitar Ceguera Mexico IAP, Res Dept, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
关键词
Blepharitis; collarettes; cylindrical dandruff; Demodex; lotilaner; mites; ocular surface disease; TP-03; OCULAR DEMODICOSIS; ORAL IVERMECTIN; HIGH PREVALENCE; INFESTATION; EFFICACY; TERPINEN-4-OL; ASSOCIATION; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1080/09273948.2022.2093755
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lotilaner ophthalmic solution, 0.25% eyedrops compared to vehicle for the treatment of Demodex blepharitis. Methods In this randomized, controlled, double-masked clinical trial, 54 participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lotilaner ophthalmic solution, 0.25% (study group) or the vehicle (control group) bilaterally, twice daily for 42 days. Outcome measures were collarette cure (collarette grade 0, upper eyelid), mite eradication (mite density of 0 mites/lash), and composite cure (grade 0 for collarettes and erythema). Results The proportion of participants achieving collarette cure (80.0% vs 15.8%; p < .001), mite eradication (73.3% vs 21.1%, p = .003) and composite cure (73.3% vs 10.5%, p < .001) at Day 42 was statistically significantly higher in the study group than the control group. Conclusion Twice-daily 42-day treatment with novel lotilaner ophthalmic solution, 0.25% is safe and effective for the treatment of Demodex blepharitis compared to the vehicle control. (Registry number: ACTRN12620000320954, dated 09/03/2020).
引用
收藏
页码:1653 / 1661
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Randomized, Double-Masked Clinical Trial Comparing Four Periodontitis Treatment Strategies: 1-Year Clinical Results
    Preus, Hans R.
    Gunleiksrud, Therese Mehlum
    Sandvik, Leiv
    Gjermo, Per
    Baelum, Vibeke
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2013, 84 (08) : 1075 - 1086
  • [22] A randomized, double-masked study comparing the efficacy of ketorolac ophthalmic solution versus diclofenac ophthalmic solution in subjects with inflammation following cataract surgery
    Zumbro, DS
    Heier, JS
    Uyemura, MJ
    Dirks, MS
    Dragoo, RA
    Sieck, EA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1996, 37 (03) : 3520 - 3520
  • [23] A randomized, double-masked trial of topical ketorolac versus artificial tears for treatment of viral conjunctivitis
    Shiuey, Y
    Ambati, BK
    Adamis, AP
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 107 (08) : 1512 - 1517
  • [24] Topical ketorolac as an adjunctive treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab in the management of diabetic macular edema: A double-masked placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial
    Nikkhah, Homayoun
    Niazpour Moez, Reza
    Entezari, Morteza
    Ramezani, Alireza
    Hassanpour, Kiana
    Karimi, Saeed
    Yaseri, Mehdi
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 259 (10) : 2949 - 2959
  • [25] Topical ketorolac as an adjunctive treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab in the management of diabetic macular edema: A double-masked placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial
    Homayoun Nikkhah
    Reza Niazpour Moez
    Morteza Entezari
    Alireza Ramezani
    Kiana Hassanpour
    Saeed Karimi
    Mehdi Yaseri
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2021, 259 : 2949 - 2959
  • [26] Prospective, Randomized, Double-Masked Clinical Trial Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Topical Tacrolimus vs. Methylprednisolone for Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease
    Saboo, Ujwala Sachin
    Abud, Tulio
    Amparo, Francisco
    Ciolino, Joseph B.
    Hamrah, Pedram
    Dana, Reza
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (07)
  • [27] Pseudophakic negative dysphotopsia and intraocular lens orientation: a prospective double-masked randomized controlled trial
    Manasseh, Gemma S. L.
    Pritchard, Edward W. J.
    Rothwell, Alice E. J.
    Luck, Jonathan
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2020, 98 (06) : E743 - E746
  • [28] Clinical cure of bacterial conjunctivitis with azithromycin 1%: Vehicle-controlled, double-masked clinical trial
    Abelson, Mark B.
    Heller, Warren
    Shapiro, Aron M.
    Si, Erwin
    Hsu, Peng
    Bowman, Lyle M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 145 (06) : 959 - 965
  • [29] A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Masked, Multi-Center Clinical Trial of Medical Adhesives for the Closure of Laparoscopic Incisions
    Kent, Andrew
    Liversedge, Neil
    Dobbins, Brian
    McWhinnie, Douglas
    Jan, Haider
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (02) : 252 - 258
  • [30] A double-masked Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) comparing four periodontitis treatment strategies: 5-year clinical results
    Preus, Hans R.
    Gjermo, Per
    Baelum, Vibeke
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2017, 44 (10) : 1029 - 1038