Alternative proteins for meat and dairy replacers: Food safety and future trends

被引:43
|
作者
Banach, J. L. [1 ]
van der Berg, J. P. [1 ]
Kleter, G. [1 ]
van Bokhorst-van de Veen, H. [2 ]
Bastiaan-Net, S. [2 ]
Pouvreau, L. [2 ]
van Asselt, E. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen Food Safety Res WFSR, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen Food & Biobased Res WFBR, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Allergy; hazards; plant-based; processing; protein; OUTBREAK; INSECTS; PEAS; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1080/10408398.2022.2089625
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Traditionally, meat and dairy products have been important protein sources in the human diet. Consumers are eating more plant-based proteins, which is reflected in current market trends. Assessing how alternative proteins are processed and their impact on food safety helps realize market opportunities while ensuring food safety. In this review, an analysis of the food safety hazards, along with current industry trends and processing methods associated with alternative proteins for meat and dairy products for the European Union market is described. Understanding the effects of processing and safety alternative proteins is paramount to ensuring food safety and understanding the risks to consumers. However, the data here is limited. With the expected further increase in protein alternatives in consumers' diets, the risk of food allergens is apparent. The occurrence of processing contaminants in plant-based alternatives may occur, along with anti-nutritional compounds, which interfere with the absorption of nutrients. Further, typical food safety hazards related to the plant, the product itself, or processing are relevant. Although hazards in insects and seaweed are being addressed, other protein alternatives like cultured meat and SCPs warrant attention. Our findings can aid industry and governmental authorities in understanding current trends and prioritizing hazards for future monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:11063 / 11080
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Meat analog as future food: a review
    Ismail, Ishamri
    Hwang, Young-Hwa
    Joo, Seon-Tea
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 62 (02) : 111 - 120
  • [32] Application of blockchain technology in food safety control:current trends and future prospects
    Xu, Yan
    Li, Xiangxin
    Zeng, Xiangquan
    Cao, Jiankang
    Jiang, Weibo
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2022, 62 (10) : 2800 - 2819
  • [33] Food safety monitoring for meat production
    Food Australia, 2008, 60 (08):
  • [34] FOOD SAFETY COUNCIL - NO MEAT REPS
    SCHAFER, DE
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1977, 31 (04) : 28 - 28
  • [35] From Meat Hygiene to Food Safety
    Brunner, U. P.
    SCHWEIZER ARCHIV FUR TIERHEILKUNDE, 2013, 155 (01): : 109 - 109
  • [36] Nanotechnology for the improvement of the quality, properties, and safety of food and agriculture: recent and future trends
    Islam, Fakhar
    Imran, Ali
    Afzaal, Muhammad
    Zahoor, Tahir
    Amjad, Nosheen
    Wei, Calvin R.
    Biswas, Sunanda
    Fatima, Maleeha
    Arshad, Muhammad Umair
    Azmat, Faiza
    Munawar, Saqlain
    Shah, Mohd Asif
    COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [37] Food for Thought: Proteomics for Meat Safety
    Tarbeeva, Svetlana
    Kozlova, Anna
    Sarygina, Elizaveta
    Kiseleva, Olga
    Ponomarenko, Elena
    Ilgisonis, Ekaterina
    LIFE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [38] Meat industry food safety campaign
    不详
    FOOD AUSTRALIA, 1997, 49 (02): : 71 - 71
  • [39] Buckwheat proteins: functionality, safety, bioactivity, and prospects as alternative plant-based proteins in the food industry
    Jin, Jian
    Ohanenye, Ikenna C.
    Udenigwe, Chibuike C.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2022, 62 (07) : 1752 - 1764
  • [40] Why alternative proteins will not disrupt the meat industry
    Siegrist, Michael
    Hartmann, Christina
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2023, 203